David Goulet <dgou...@ev0ke.net> writes: > I don't believe we should suffix here because for almost 10 years, users/apps > have been exposed to "hostname" and it does make sense that it's the goto file > for that.
I'm +1 on keeping the filename as "hostname". txtorcon doesn't do processing on it, per se. Might be worth noting here that it's not always "a" hostname: if you have an authenticated hidden-service, it is multiple lines. In "basic" auth case, each line starts with the same .onion address -- in "stealth" case, each line has its own .onion address. cheers, -- meejah _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
