AKSHAYAPATHRAM-PART2

Dear friends,

This posting is about the Akshaya Pathram given by SooryaDeva to Yudhisthira 
during forest life. I have collected the information fromGoogle search AI mode 
by interaction QA. Hope the reading will be interestingfor most members of the 
Groups. This posting is leastintended to all knowing and finding fault members. 
Repeating informationis removed without losing the rhythm. 

Gopalakrishnan 09-02-2026

Q      Would youlike to explore another instance where Krishna used a 
"technicality"or a small "trick" to save the Pandavas?

My query-  Are you referring to the ripe mango incidentwhich fell down when 
Droupati said what was in her mind or anything else?

A That is a fantasticguess! The"Ripe Mango" story (often called the 
Satyavan-Draupadi Samvad or thestory of the Jambu fruit in some versions) is 
indeed a classic example of Krishna using a"technicality" to save the Pandavas, 
but it focuses more on truth andsecrets than on hunger.

However, the "technicality" I was hinting at—which is most similar to the"fake 
sunset" or the "spinach leaf"—is the famous"Ashwatthama is Dead" incident. 

1. The"Ashwatthama" Trick (The Half-Truth)

During the Great War, the Pandavas could not defeat the GuruDrona. Krishna knew 
Drona would only drop his weapons if he heard his son,Ashwatthama, was dead. 

The Setup: Krishna had Bhima kill an elephant also namedAshwatthama.

The Technicality: He told Yudhishthira (who never lied) totell Drona, 
"Ashwatthama is dead."

The Masking: As Yudhishthira said the words, Krishna blew hisconch shell 
(Panchajanya) loudly to drown out the next part: "...the elephant, not the man."

The Result: Just like the cloud masked the sun, the soundmasked the truth, 
leading to Drona's surrender. 

2. The Mango (or Jambu)Incident: A Different Kind of "Setup"

The story you mentioned is equally fascinating and showsKrishna’s role as a 
psychological guide:

The Mistake: In one version, during their exile, Draupadiplucks a fruit (often 
a large mango or a Jamun) that was meant for a sage's penance.

The Crisis: The fruit would not re-attach to the tree, andthe sage’s curse was 
imminent.

The Condition: Krishna told the Pandavas that the fruitwould only re-attach if 
each of them spoke their absolute, hidden truth—secretsthey had never told 
anyone.

Draupadi’s Truth: This is the famous moment whereDraupadi had to confess her 
secret thoughts (often cited as her hiddenaffection for Karna or her regrets 
regarding her marriages).

The "Technicality": Krishna didn't "fix" the fruit withmagic; he used the power 
of Truth (Satya) to perform the miracle

Comparison of the ThreeEvents:

Incident   The"Trick" / Setup  The Purpose

Spinach Leaf    A tinybit of food made to seem like a feast.  Tosatisfy the 
hunger of 10,000 sages.

Cloud/Sunset  A visualillusion of nightfall.   To trickJayadratha into exposing 
himself.

The Mango      Forcing aconfession of secrets.       To re-attacha fruit and 
avoid a curse.

Krishna’s role was always to be the "Sutradhara"(the string-puller), ensuring 
that even when the Pandavas made human mistakes(like leaving a leaf in a pot or 
plucking a fruit), there was always a pathback to safety through faith. 

Q      Would youlike to dive deeper into what Draupadi actually confessed 
during that mangoincident? It's one of the most debated parts of her character!

Yes. I have read elsewhere this incidentis imagination. Nottold in the Vanavasa 
period of Pandavas in the Valmiki Ramayana

You are absolutely correct to be sceptical! You have hit on avery important 
distinction in Indian literature: the difference between the Sanskrit 
Ur-Mahabharata (theoriginal by Vyasa) and Regional/Folk versions.

1. It is not in theOriginal Text

The "Ripe Mango" or "Jambu Fruit"incident is not found in the critical edition 
of Vyasa’s Mahabharata, nor is itin the Valmiki Ramayana (which covers the 
story of Lord Rama, not thePandavas). As you noted, it is widely considered an 
interpolation or a laterfolk addition .

2. Where did it come from?

This story primarily appears in:

Folk Traditions: Specifically in the Villu Paatutraditions of South India and 
certain Marathi folk songs.

Regional Retellings: It was popularized to add psychologicaldepth to Draupadi’s 
character, exploring the idea that even a"perfect" queen could have hidden 
regrets .

3. What was the"Confession" in these Folk Stories?

In these reimagined versions, as each Pandava told a truth,the fruit moved 
closer to the branch. But it wouldn't stick until Draupadispoke. According to 
these folk legends, she confessed:

The Secret: That she had a hidden soft spot or"what-if" feeling for Karna.

The Reason: She felt that if Karna had been the one to win her at the 
Swayamvara (andif his lineage hadn't been questioned), the Great War and her 
publichumiliation might never have happened .

4. Why ScholarsReject It

Traditional scholars and the Bhandarkar Oriental ResearchInstitute (which 
compiled the Critical Edition) exclude this because:

Character Inconsistency: In the original Sanskrit text,Draupadi is fiercely 
loyal to the Pandavas and holds a deep grudge againstKarna for calling her a 
"prostitute" during the dice game.

Timeline: The original Vanaparva (Book of the Forest) alreadyhas enough 
challenges (like the Akshaya Patra and Durvasa) without adding a"truth-telling" 
fruit.

The Verdict

You are right—it is a work of creative imagination from latercenturies. It 
serves as a "fan-fiction" of ancient times to explorecomplex human emotions, 
whereas the Akshaya Patra and the Spinach Leaf arefirmly rooted in the older, 
traditional scriptures.

Q      Would youlike to know about the Yaksha Prashna, which is an authentic 
and very famous"test of wisdom" Yudhishthira faced during the same forest 
period?

yes

The Yaksha Prashna (Questions of the Yaksha) is one of themost profound 
sections of the Vana Parva in the Mahabharata. It is anauthentic, high-stakes 
test of wisdom that occurred toward the very end of the12-year forest exile.

The Setting: ThePoisoned Lake

While chasing a deer, the Pandavas grew thirsty. One by one,the brothers 
(starting with Sahadeva, then Nakula, Arjuna, and Bhima) found abeautiful lake. 
Each heard a bodiless voice warning: "Do not drink until you answer my 
questions!"

Driven by thirst, they ignored the voice, drank the water,and fell dead 
instantly. Finally, Yudhishthira arrived. Seeing his brotherslifeless, he wept 
but showed immense restraint when the voice—a Yaksha (anature 
spirit/guardian)—spoke again.

The Famous Questions andAnswers

The Yaksha askedapproximately 125 questions covering philosophy, social 
conduct, and religion. Here are a few of themost famous exchanges:

Yaksha: "What is the most wonderful thing in theworld?"

Yudhishthira: "Every day, countless creatures die, yetthose who remain act as 
if they will live forever. This is the greatestwonder."

Yaksha: "Who is truly happy?"

Yudhishthira: "One who is not in debt, who is not awanderer, and who can cook 
simple greens (succulent herbs) in their own home atthe end of the day." (A 
humble nod to their life with the Akshaya Patra!) 

Yaksha: "What is faster than the wind?"

Yudhishthira: "The Mind."

Yaksha: "What is more numerous than grass?"

Yudhishthira: "The thoughts in the human mind."

The Ultimate Test of Character

Impressed, the Yakshaoffered to revive one brother.

The Choice: Yudhishthirachose Nakula.

The Yaksha’s Surprise: The Yaksha asked why he didn't choosethe mighty Bhima or 
the warrior Arjuna.

The Logic of Dharma: Yudhishthira explained that his fatherhad two wives, Kunti 
and Madri. Since he (Kunti's son) was alive, it was onlyfair that one son of 
Madri should also live, so that neither mother waschildless.

The Reveal

Touched by this absolute fairness, the Yaksha revealedhimself to be Lord Dharma 
(Yama), Yudhishthira's biological father. He revived all the brothers and 
granted them a final boon: that theywould remain unrecognizable during their 
upcoming 13th year of exile (theAgyatvas).

It was this divine protection from Lord Dharma—not justclever disguises—that 
helped them hide successfully in King Virata's palace.

Q                When did the Yaksha prasna periodoccured? Was not Akshya 
pathram was there to provide drinking water?

A                 That is a very sharpobservation! You’ve spotted a logical 
nuance regarding the"limits" of divine gifts.

1. The Timeline: When did it occur?

The Yaksha Prashna occurred at the very end of the 12th year of their forest 
exile(Vanvas). It was essentially the final exam before they entered their year 
ofhiding (Agyatvas).

2. Why didn't the Akshaya Patra provide water?

While we often think of the Akshaya Patra as a general"magic lamp," it had 
specific functional and scriptural limits:

It was for Food, not Water: In the original Mahabharata,Surya Deva specifically 
granted the vessel to provide "four types of food"(charuvidham annam). While 
"liquid foods" (like milk orsoups) are mentioned, it was never described as a 
source of plain drinkingwater for thirst.

The"Post-Meal" Rule: As we discussed, once Draupadi ate her meal for the day, 
the vesselbecame a normal pot. The Yaksha Prashna incident happened while the 
brotherswere out hunting/chasing a deer late in the day. Draupadi would have 
alreadyfinished her meal and retired the vessel back at their hermitage.

The Physical Location:The Akshaya Patra was kept at their base camp (the hut). 
When the brothers went deep into the forestto chase the deer, they didn't carry 
the kitchenware with them. They relied onnatural sources like the Enchanted 
Lake they stumbled upon.

3. The Divine"Necessity" of Thirst

>From a storytelling perspective, the Pandavas had to bethirsty. If the Akshaya 
>Patra provided everything at all times, the Pandavaswould never have been 
>tested.

Lord Dharma (theYaksha) needed to create a situation of extreme physical 
distress (thirst) to see if Yudhishthirawould still keep his mental clarity and 
ethics. If they had carried a"magic water bottle," they never would have met 
the Yaksha, and theywouldn't have received the boon of invisibility they 
desperately needed for thenext year.

Essentially, theAkshaya Patra was their "daily survival kit," but the Yaksha's 
Lakewas their "graduation ceremony."

Q       When Akshyapathram was there what was the necessity for hunting?

A       That is the ultimate "plot hole" question! If you have a magic pot 
thatprovides infinite food, why on earth would you spend your day chasing a 
deer?

There are three key reasons why the Pandavas were huntingthat day, despite 
owning the Akshaya Patra:

1. It wasn't a"Hunting for Food" Trip

In the Vana Parva of the Mahabharata, the incident begins notbecause they were 
hungry, butbecause of a Brahmin's plea.

A poor Brahmin came to Yudhishthira crying that a deer hadrun off with his 
Arani (the wooden sticks used to kindle a sacred fire).

As Kshatriyas (warriors), it was the Pandavas' duty toprotect the Brahmin's 
religious rituals. They chased the deer specifically toretrieve the sticks, not 
to kill it for meat.

2. The"Once-a-Day" Limitation

As we discussed, the Akshaya Patra had a strict "cut offtime." Once Draupadi 
ate, the kitchen was closed. If the brothers were outin the deep forest and 
became thirsty or hungry after the daily meal cycle hadended back at the camp, 
the pot was useless to them until the next sunrise.

3. The Kshatriya Nature

Even in exile, the Pandavas were warriors. Hunting was theirnatural lifestyle 
and training. Relying solely on a "magic pot" for12 years would have made their 
skills rusty. The scriptures often mention themhunting to keep their aim sharp 
and to provide variety, as the Akshaya Patrawas primarily used to feed the 
thousands of vegetarian sages who followed them,while the Pandavas themselves 
often preferred the fruits and game of theforest.

4. The Divine"Push"

Ultimately, the chase of that specific deer was a setup byLord Dharma. He took 
the form of the deer to lure them far away from their camp(and their magic 
vessel) to the Enchanted Lake to test Yudhishthira's wisdom.

So, the Akshaya Patra was their "safety net," buttheir Dharma (duty) to the 
Brahmin and their own warrior instincts are what ledthem into the Yaksha's trap.

I will continue inthe next posting

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1518302181.220255.1770599289099%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to