--
*Mar*I hear the anger and urgency beneath your question—and it’s justified.
But if universities are *shamed* in the crude, adversarial sense, they will
only harden, defend, and rebrand. Cartesian institutions are very good at
absorbing criticism without transformation.
So the task is not *to insult universities*, but *to expose their
contradiction so clearly that legitimacy drains away*.
That kind of shame is ecological, not aggressive. It works by *revealing*,
not attacking.
Here are *non-Cartesian ways to shame universities into change*—ways that
operate like nature itself.
------------------------------
1. *Expose the Lie at the Heart of “Education”*
Universities claim they:
-
prepare students for the future
-
generate knowledge
-
serve society
Yet they systematically train students for *ecological collapse*.
The shame comes from asking one calm, devastating question—publicly and
repeatedly:
*“How does this course prepare students for a world of climate instability,
biodiversity loss, and planetary limits?”*
Not as protest.
As curriculum audit.
When a syllabus cannot answer this, it stands naked.
*Key tactic:*
Publish *“Ecological Irrelevance Reports”* for departments—showing how much
of the curriculum is unusable in a living future.
------------------------------
2. *Turn Their Metrics Against Them*
Cartesian institutions worship numbers. Use that weakness.
Ask universities to publish:
-
Ecological footprint of graduates’ careers
-
Carbon and biodiversity impact of “successful alumni”
-
Percentage of research funding tied to extractive industries
Then ask:
*“If your graduates destroy the conditions of life, by what metric are you
calling this success?”*
This is not moralizing.
It is *internal contradiction exposure*.
Nothing shames a system more than failing its own criteria.
------------------------------
3. *Make Nature the Examiner*
Instead of demanding reform, *create parallel evaluations*.
-
Rate universities not by rankings, but by:
-
land regenerated,
-
ecosystems protected,
-
communities healed,
-
children’s futures safeguarded.
Call it something like:
*The Ecological Literacy Index*
Universities fear irrelevance more than criticism.
When students, parents, and donors start asking *why a university scores
low*, the shame becomes institutional.
------------------------------
4. *Reveal the Psychological Violence of Economic Education*
This is powerful and underused.
Show—through stories, research, and testimony—how:
-
economics education suppresses empathy,
-
normalizes harm,
-
rewards dissociation,
-
fragments identity (your Jekyll–Hyde insight).
Frame it as *mental health damage*, not ideology.
“This education produces employability—but at the cost of inner coherence.”
Universities claim to care about student wellbeing.
Make the contradiction visible.
------------------------------
5. *Create Living Counter-Institutions*
Nothing shames an institution like being *outgrown*.
-
Free Nature Parks with learning residencies
-
Forest classrooms without grades
-
Ecological apprenticeships recognized by communities
-
Research emerging from ecosystems, not labs alone
When students say:
“I learned more in six months with trees than in four years of lectures”
—universities feel it.
Not as insult.
As *existential embarrassment*.
------------------------------
6. *Reframe “Employability” as Ecological Illiteracy*
Quietly but firmly replace the question:
❌ “Will this get me a job?”
✅ “Will this help me remain human on a damaged planet?”
Publish essays, talks, and dialogues asking:
*“What is the employment value of a dead river?”*
*“How employable is a species in extinction?”*
When economic language collapses under ecological reality, shame arises
organically.
------------------------------
7. *Use Elders, Not Activists*
Universities dismiss activists.
They cannot easily dismiss *elders, retired professors, doctors, farmers,
ecologists, grandparents*.
Get them to ask:
“Why are you training children for a world that cannot exist?”
This is intergenerational shame—the deepest kind.
------------------------------
8. *Refuse the Language, Calmly*
The most radical act is *not to argue in their vocabulary*.
-
Don’t say “resources” → say “relatives”
-
Don’t say “growth” → say “metabolic stress”
-
Don’t say “development” → say “conversion of life into money”
When universities sound crude and outdated by comparison, the shame is
cultural, not confrontational.
------------------------------
A Final, Non-Cartesian Truth
Universities will not change because they are *told* they are wrong.
They will change when it becomes *embarrassing to remain unchanged*.
Nature does not shame by shouting.
It shames by *outlasting*.
If you like, I can:
-
draft a *“Declaration of Ecological Illegitimacy” for universities*,
-
design a *Free Nature University model*, or
-
rewrite your ideas as a *quiet but lethal academic critique* that
institutions cannot easily dismiss.
Just tell me which path you want to walk 🌱
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJF%3DFY44jJLG7HQFEchQ3bEkqbr%2BZVAhySxBpwHH7SfCw%40mail.gmail.com.
