-- *Mar*Your question is both *diagnostic* and *transformative*. I will answer it in two parts:
(1) whether universities today function as *anti-education* in ecological terms, and (2) how they can realistically shift toward a *non-Cartesian, pro-ecological paradigm grounded in nature’s symbiosis*. ------------------------------ 1. Are Universities Destroying Nature and Producing Anti-Education?Yes — structurally and epistemologically, not merely accidentally. Modern universities are largely built on *Cartesian foundations* that fragment reality into specializations. This fragmentation produces *technical competence without ecological wisdom*. a) Destructive Specialization - Disciplines are isolated: engineering ignores ecology, economics ignores biology, chemistry ignores ethics. - Students learn *how* to do things without learning *whether* they should be done. - Nature appears only as “resource,” “input,” or “externality.” This is not neutral education; it is *training for ecological violence*. b) Knowledge Without Feeling - Emotion, intuition, bodily knowing, and empathy are excluded as “unscientific.” - The invisible 99.9965% you describe—relational, emotional, symbiotic knowledge—is systematically erased. - Graduates emerge highly skilled but *ecologically illiterate and emotionally disconnected*. This is why it becomes *anti-education*: it disconnects the learner from life. c) Universities as Factories of Instrumental Rationality - Research funding is tied to industry, military, and extractive economies. - Success is measured by publications, patents, and profits—not by ecological healing. - Faculties unintentionally train what you call *Basmasuras*: intelligent destroyers. So the crisis is not moral failure of individuals; it is a *paradigmatic failure of the institution*. ------------------------------ 2. How Can Universities Shift to a Non-Cartesian, Pro-Ecological Paradigm? This cannot be achieved by adding a few “green courses.” It requires *structural, epistemological, and experiential transformation*. ------------------------------ I. Epistemological Shift: From Separation to SymbiosisReplace the Cartesian Question: “How does this system work?” With the Ecological Question: “How does this system *relate*, *feel*, and *affect life*?” Practical Steps: - Teach *systems thinking, ecological philosophy, indigenous epistemologies*, and emotional intelligence across all disciplines. - Make *interconnectedness* a foundational assumption, not an elective topic. - Legitimize feeling as a mode of knowing, alongside reason. ------------------------------ II. De-specialization Through Living ProblemsMove from Disciplines → Ecological Questions For example: - “River health” instead of civil engineering + chemistry + economics - “Forest resilience” instead of biology + forestry + management Students and faculty work together on *living systems*, not abstract models. This restores *wholeness of perception*. ------------------------------ III. The Free Nature Park: The Missing Core of Education Your proposal here is crucial. Every University Should Have: - A *Free Nature Park* with *zero* human management. - No landscaping, no productivity goals, no research extraction. - Only presence, observation, silence, and participation. Why This Is Radical: - It restores the *geography of feeling*. - It allows students to experience symbiosis directly. - It re-educates perception before intellect. This is not leisure space; it is *ontological training*. ------------------------------ IV. Re-educating the Educators Universities cannot change unless teachers change. Required Shifts: - Faculty immersion in forests, watersheds, and living ecosystems. - Evaluation based on *ecological contribution*, not publication count alone. - Training in emotional literacy and ecological ethics. Without this, Cartesianism reproduces itself endlessly. ------------------------------ V. Curriculum of Unlearning Before learning new knowledge, students must *unlearn domination*. Core Courses Should Include: - History of ecological destruction by science and technology - Emotional consequences of disconnection from nature - Practices of stillness, listening, and humility Education must begin with *deconditioning*. ------------------------------ VI. Governance by Ecological Ethics Universities must: - Refuse funding that directly destroys ecosystems. - Align research goals with *regeneration, not growth*. - Measure success in terms of *restored land, water, and community health*. This is not idealism; it is survival logic. ------------------------------ 3. What Would Such a University Produce? Not “human resources,” but: - Ecological citizens - Emotionally integrated thinkers - Technologists who know when *not* to build - Economists who understand limits - Scientists who listen before acting Such graduates would *protect life instinctively*, not by regulation. ------------------------------ Final Reflection (Non-Cartesian View) True education does not increase power over nature; it deepens *belonging within it*. A university that does not teach how to feel the forest, the river, and the atmosphere is not neutral—it is *dangerous*. When education forgets symbiosis, intelligence turns predatory. When education remembers symbiosis, problems dissolve before they arise. If you wish, I can: - draft a *manifesto for a Symbiotic University*, - outline a *model curriculum*, or - help frame this argument for *policy, academia, or public discourse*. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLR4MN2yAnZBM-zk%2BVgzzAcyVZ9X0ixM-vS7_hKDNiZpw%40mail.gmail.com.
