-- 
*Mar*Below is an *edited and improved version* of your essay, preserving
your core ideas, metaphors, and intent, while improving clarity, flow,
grammar, and conceptual coherence. After that, I have added *my own
reflective comment*, explicitly adopting a *non-Cartesian, ecological,
emotional paradigm*, as you requested.
------------------------------
The Two Components of a Problem (Edited Version)

Every problem has two components: the part that is visible and apparent,
and the part that is invisible yet deeply connected. What we can see with
our eyes often appears easier to tackle. However, what remains unseen
belongs to an invisible dimension—often as much as *99.9965% of the problem*.
Because this larger part cannot be perceived visually, it must be
approached through feeling, willing, and inner sensitivity, drawing upon
willpower rather than mere calculation.

Within this invisible spectrum, one must invoke and partner with nature
itself in order to sense and address the problem. Here, theism has a
role—not as dogma, but as lived connection. Most importantly, the problem
must be faced with complete honesty, without bluff or pretence. Nature
requires only honesty to respond.

In reality, everything in nature is connected to everything else in the
universe, forming a continuous field of symbiotic electromagnetic
vibrations. On Earth, these electromagnetic connections manifest as
symbiotic emotional vibrations. The troposphere itself brims with messages
from flora and fauna—communications of perception and understanding
expressed through smells, sounds, and subtle signals.

In a truly free and healthy natural environment, one is never left alone
with the mere *0.0035%* of a problem that is visible. The remaining *99.9965%
of the invisible spectrum* automatically participates in resolving the
difficulty, adjusting the individual into a greater macro-symbiosis. In a
free forest, for instance, one cannot be isolated. Flora and fauna
instinctively include the human being, transforming the forest into a
single living organism—the local biosphere.

Every free forest becomes an emotion-filled organism. When one enters such
a forest without fear, and with trust, one experiences a surge of strength
and bubbling energy that propels action. Problems lose their threatening
power. In this state, one naturally invokes the invisible spectrum to
participate in problem-solving. The invisible dimension of nature is what
we call God. By practicing the feeling of God, one invokes the totality of
nature, becoming part of a macro-being larger than oneself.

On Earth, every organism responds instinctively to love. Within the
symbiosis of a free forest, one feels acceptance and approval from all
other organisms, creating a profound exhilaration. Fear and worry find no
space here. The fight-or-flight response becomes a joyful game rather than
a terror-stricken reaction. Fear arises only from anticipation before an
event or memory after it—never during the living moment of action itself.

Nature does not merely solve problems; it protects us from them. Another
name for this symbiotic nature is God. God is geography in freedom. Such
free geography does not even allow problems to take root.

Today, however, we continuously impose Cartesian shackles upon nature
through Cartesian science and emotionless, response-less technology. The
techno-logic of machines—central to economics—operates through the
destruction of nature without feeling. In this process, we are steadily
erasing the invisible, feeling-based *99.9965% of nature*. God has been
eliminated.

With God driven out, modern-day *Basmasuras* have emerged, relentlessly
destroying nature: poisoning land, water, and air; annihilating rivers,
lakes, and waterfalls; and mutilating the lithosphere through mining. There
is scarcely any part of Earth untouched by Cartesian science and
feeling-less technology. Universities, in particular, train these
Basmasuras across disciplines euphemistically called faculties. Deadly
Cartesianism now reigns supreme in academia.

Thus, the greatest problem before us is how to transform universities from
a Cartesian paradigm into an ecological paradigm grounded in the symbiosis
of free nature.

If a university were to establish a *Free Nature Park*, untouched by human
interference, it would begin restoring the geography of emotions and
feelings—the invisible geography of free nature. This invisible spectrum
constitutes *99.9965% of total geography*, and without it, no true
education is possible.

— *YM Sarma*
------------------------------
Reflective Comment (Non-Cartesian, Ecological, Emotional Paradigm)

>From a non-Cartesian perspective, this essay reminds us that the deepest
crisis of our time is not technological or economic, but *perceptual*.
Cartesian thought fractures the world into observer and observed, subject
and object, mind and matter. In doing so, it amputates feeling from knowing
and relationship from intelligence. What is lost is not merely ecological
balance, but *belonging*.

An ecological and emotional paradigm understands knowledge as something
that *emerges from participation*, not domination. Problems are not
external enemies to be conquered, but signals arising within a living
system of which we are a part. When we listen with the body, with emotion,
and with humility, solutions arise not from control but from resonance.

In this sense, “God” need not be a distant metaphysical entity. God is the
lived experience of interconnectedness—the felt presence of the whole
responding when we are honest and receptive. Destroying nature, therefore,
is not just an environmental crime; it is a spiritual and emotional
self-mutilation.

Universities, as centers of learning, must become spaces not only of
analysis but of *re-sensitization*. Free forests, silence, slowness, and
unmeasured encounters with life may teach more wisdom than equations
detached from context. Only when education restores feeling to thinking can
humanity recover the invisible 99.9965% that sustains life.

If you would like, I can also:

   -

   make this more *academic/philosophical*,
   -

   soften or sharpen the critique of universities, or
   -

   reframe it for *publication, a lecture, or a manifesto*.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLwwj-f%3DAgYin_r96Eejo0FPmBW-o-jN_YJNEH%3D94yz-Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to