-- 
*Mar*Yes—*it is possible in principle to free universities from the
economic stranglehold and from exclusive Cartesianism*, but it will *not
happen automatically, quickly, or from within existing incentive structures*.
It requires a *reorientation of purpose*, not merely reform. I’ll answer in
three layers: *whether it is possible, what would be required, and what
realistically can be done now*.
------------------------------
1. Is It Possible?

*Yes, but only if universities cease to see themselves primarily as engines
of economic production.*

Historically, universities were not born as economic institutions. Nalanda,
Takshashila, Plato’s Academy, medieval monasteries, and gurukulas were
spaces of:

   -

   Contemplation
   -

   Direct perception
   -

   Dialogue with nature, self, and cosmos

Cartesianism and economics entered universities *much later*, when
knowledge was redefined as *utility* and education as *investment*. Once
this happened, nature became a “resource,” students became “human capital,”
and knowledge became “output.”

So the problem is not inherent to universities—it is *historical and
ideological*.
------------------------------
2. What Prevents Liberation?

Three interlocking forces keep universities bound:
a) Economic Dependency

Universities rely on:

   -

   State funding tied to economic outcomes
   -

   Corporate sponsorship
   -

   Employability metrics

This forces curricula toward:

   -

   Measurable outputs
   -

   Market relevance
   -

   Technological manipulation

Direct perception, sensing, silence, and feeling *cannot be quantified*, so
they are excluded.
b) Epistemological Monopoly

Cartesianism presents itself not as *a method* but as *the only legitimate
method*.

Once this monopoly is accepted:

   -

   Feeling is labeled “subjective”
   -

   Sensing is dismissed as “unscientific”
   -

   Consciousness is treated as a byproduct or illusion

Universities no longer ask *what is real?*—they ask *what can be measured?*
c) Cultural Fear

Direct perception destabilizes systems.

A student who learns to feel the forest:

   -

   Will question economic growth
   -

   Will resist ecological destruction
   -

   Will not easily become a compliant consumer

Thus, sensing is politically inconvenient.
------------------------------
3. Can Universities Be Freed? A Realistic Answer*Universities cannot be
fully freed from within—at least not at first.*

Why?
Because institutions defend their survival logic. Any system dependent on
economics will protect economic priorities.

*Liberation will begin at the edges*, not at the center.
------------------------------
4. How Liberation Could Actually Happen1. Parallel Knowledge Spaces (Most
Important)

Historically, renewal never began inside dominant institutions.

Examples:

   -

   Forest ashrams alongside kingdoms
   -

   Monasteries alongside empires
   -

   Independent studios alongside academies

We need *parallel learning ecosystems*:

   -

   Small, place-based learning communities
   -

   Nature-embedded study
   -

   No grades, no rankings, no economic targets

These will not replace universities immediately—but they will *outgrow them
spiritually*.
------------------------------
2. Reintroducing Direct Perception as Legitimate Inquiry

This is radical but essential.

Universities could allow:

   -

   Silent observation courses
   -

   Nature immersion without data extraction
   -

   Learning journals based on sensing, not analysis

Not as “soft electives,” but as *foundational practices*.

This would fracture Cartesian monopoly without destroying science.
------------------------------
3. Economic Decoupling (Partial, Not Total)

Total economic independence is unrealistic, but *partial insulation* is
possible:

   -

   Endowment-based autonomy
   -

   Community-supported education
   -

   Low-scale, low-cost campuses

The key is *frugality*, not funding expansion.
------------------------------
4. New Measures of Knowledge

Replace:

   -

   “What did you produce?”
   With:
   -

   “What did you perceive?”
   -

   “What changed in your relationship with life?”

These are unscalable—but truth is rarely scalable.
------------------------------
5. My View: A Necessary Warning

Freeing universities alone will *not save nature*.

Why?
Because destruction is driven by:

   -

   Civilizational values
   -

   Consumer desire
   -

   Political power

Universities reflect society more than they lead it.

However, *without freeing education, no other liberation will last*.

Education shapes:

   -

   How humans see nature
   -

   Whether they feel kinship or domination
   -

   Whether they listen or extract

------------------------------
6. What Is Already Emerging (Quietly)

Though invisible to rankings:

   -

   Some ecological universities
   -

   Indigenous knowledge schools
   -

   Contemplative science programs
   -

   Field-based learning collectives

They are small, fragile, and often ignored—but *all meaningful change
starts this way*.
------------------------------
7. Final Answer (Plainly Stated)

*Yes, universities can be freed—but only by redefining what knowledge is.*

If knowledge remains:

   -

   A commodity
   -

   A tool of control
   -

   A servant of economics

Then universities will remain engines of destruction.

If knowledge is reclaimed as:

   -

   Relationship
   -

   Perception
   -

   Responsibility
   -

   Reverence

Then universities can once again become places where *nature is met, not
conquered*.

But this will require courage—not innovation.

And courage cannot be engineered.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLfjBVQ_BL_5J1cMirSYvfk1zq5q3z846REsxQeJ9Dj-A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to