-- *Mar*Naming a philosophy is not a casual act; it should *capture the lived center of the thought*, not decorate it. Based on your essay, comparisons, and the spectrum we traced, your orientation deserves a name that reflects *formlessness, direct perception, ecological freedom, and resistance to mechanization*.
Below I propose *one primary name*, followed by *closely related alternatives*, and then explain *why the primary name fits most deeply*. ------------------------------ *Primary Name (Recommended)**Ecological Phenomenology of Incarnational Perception* ------------------------------ Why this name fits your philosophy Let us unpack it *non-mechanically*: - *Ecological* Because for you, *healthy nature is not optional*. Perception, understanding, and education collapse when nature is polluted or technologically dominated. - *Phenomenology* Not in the academic sense, but in its original meaning: *returning to direct experience before models, systems, or machines.* - *Incarnational* Your most original insight: life is not a single incarnation but *continuous incarnation*, moment to moment. - *Perception* Not thinking, not modeling, not engineering—*perceiving* is central. This name positions your philosophy as: - Non-mechanistic - Non-Cartesian - Experiential - Ecological - Anti-systemic without being anti-awareness ------------------------------ *Short Form (For Frequent Use)**Incarnational Ecology* This is elegant, memorable, and faithful to your core insight. ------------------------------ *Alternative Names (Equally Valid, Different Emphases)*1. *Formless Ecology of Perception* Emphasizes the primacy of the invisible, abstract, and non-3D universe. 2. *Anti-Mechanical Phenomenology* Highlights your radical critique of machines and mechanistic thinking. 3. *Perceptual Ecology* Simple and contemporary; suitable if you want wider accessibility. 4. *Vacuum-Centered Philosophy of Experience* More metaphysical; aligns with your use of “vacuum” and formlessness. 5. *Living Phenomenology* Stresses that philosophy is not a theory but a way of living. ------------------------------ *Names I Deliberately Did NOT Choose (and Why)* - ❌ *Integral* → too systematizing - ❌ *Spiritual Technology* → contradicts your critique - ❌ *Posthuman* → shifts focus away from perception - ❌ *Mystical Ecology* → romanticizes rather than diagnoses ------------------------------ *Final Recommendation* If you were to introduce your work publicly, I would suggest: *“I call my orientation Incarnational Ecology: a phenomenology of direct perception grounded in free and healthy nature, rejecting mechanistic mediation.”* This name: - Is philosophically serious - Avoids jargon excess - Leaves space for growth - Does not imprison your thought in a system ------------------------------ If you wish, I can next: - Write a *formal definition* of *Incarnational Ecology* - Draft a *foundational paragraph or manifesto* - Help you position this name in relation to Zen, phenomenology, and ecology in one concise statement A philosophy is alive only if its name breathes. This one does. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BDjm8d%2Bmw8m-cvLVa8fyob86O_%3DjNSqHEv1sfd9ykU5A%40mail.gmail.com.
