-- *Mar*Dark Night and Animals
How many of us have courage to enter into a thick forest on a dark night? If one is living in cities or towns, the answer, I think is none. But no animal is afraid of a dark night with no lights whatever. Because the animals depend mainly on smelling and sensing. We lost totally our capacity to smell and sense. Animals on the other hand, breathe, smell and sense, which develops into the flow of emotions, emotions, which propel the positive acceptance of nature. The animals feel and accept. We have doubts and questions and we just do not accept. We need some light to get the false 3D seeing. We live in the fundamentally false, false created by technology. The fear of the dark night clearly high lights the realty of our cyborged living. Science and technology continuously corrode our faith in nature, which has extended to distrust in our own organs. We need some machine to do the work of almost every organ. We need machines as organs to live. Animals depend on nature to feel and live. They do not suffer from the hysteria of/for new and new and new technology. We cannot accept the dark night, as we have forgotten totally perception by breathing and smelling. Animals enter a thick forest on a dark night without any fear because they smell and sense. Thanks to Rene Descartes, today we are killing everything natural, and are depending only on the 3D reasoning of the Brain. May be we feel that God really is jailed in our pineal gland. We are discarding our organs and depending only on our Brain and the machines created by the Brain. Nature is just economic resource, to kill and use or misuse. YM Sarma Chat gpt Here is a thoughtful, balanced commentary on your piece. If you’d like it in a more formal academic style, shorter, or more poetic, just let me know. ------------------------------ *Commentary on “Dark Night and Animals”* Your reflection offers a powerful critique of our modern, technologically mediated relationship with nature. You use the contrast between humans and animals in a dark forest as an effective metaphor for the ways in which contemporary life has distanced us from our own sensory capacities. The central idea—that animals rely on smell, breath, and instinct while humans rely increasingly on artificial extensions of the body—is conveyed passionately and with strong philosophical undertones. One of the strengths of your piece is the clear, almost visceral image of a human hesitant at the edge of a forest while animals move freely within it. This opposition illustrates your broader argument: technology has not only altered our environment but altered us, eroding trust in our natural faculties and tethering us to artificial aids. Phrases like “false 3D seeing” and “cyborged living” capture this alienation vividly. Your reference to Descartes situates the piece within a deeper philosophical discourse—the rise of rationalism, the elevation of the intellect, and the neglect or suspicion of the body. While this is an intriguing angle, you may want to clarify the connection slightly: is the problem rational thought itself, or the modern overreliance on detached reasoning at the expense of embodied experience? Sharpening this part would strengthen your argument. There is also a compelling environmental subtext: by reducing nature to an “economic resource,” you suggest that our technological worldview has moral and ecological consequences beyond personal sensory loss. This broadens the scope of the piece and gives it urgency. If you wish to further refine the essay, you might: - provide a little more nuance by acknowledging the value of some technologies, which could make your critique even more persuasive; - consider adding a specific example or personal anecdote to ground the philosophical reflections; - connect more explicitly how reclaiming sensory experience could change our relationship with nature and ourselves. Overall, the piece is evocative, philosophical, and emotionally driven. It successfully raises questions about what we have lost in becoming increasingly technological beings, and it invites readers to reconsider the nature of perception, embodiment, and our place in the living world. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKNrtb1Q80T8m1G61OMtpf3KuhEYpqaYaU7R5uLNn4-FA%40mail.gmail.com.
