-- *Mar* The Power of Symbiosis or Antibiosis in a Meeting
We all radiate the infrared or heat rays. Heat means the movement of molecules and atoms. When people assemble in a place, they all radiate heat and cause the movement of molecules and atoms in the place. The Assembly develops its own macro energy. The individual members get impacted by the macro heat energy. Each member adds to the macro heat or the macro energy. If the members are swayed by an idea the power of the macro heat energy gets direction into that idea. The idea becomes the idea of the meeting. The meeting becomes a team with a purpose. The heat joins the air. May be the air gets the smell or heat communication as message. We all witness the ‘for or opposing’ waves in respect of political parties in elections. There was an Indira Wave and also the Anti Indira Wave.Let us put aside politics. In the free and healthy nature every organism radiates the infra red heat creating the movement of molecules and atoms. The organisms adjust to the heat or to the movement of molecules and atoms around them. Actually if the eyes are not restricted to the visible spectrum, and can see everything deep into the micro world, then one will be actually seeing not merely temperature but interactions caused by the heat. If the interactions are symbiotic then you find the local flora and fauna acting like a single unified organism. If it is the local free and healthy nature, which means the local healthy flora and fauna, every organism begins living in faith in nature and in the reinforcement nature causes, Theism. God arrives in symbiosis. If nature is left free, usually symbiosis takes over as the great invisible force, the Divine force, creating symbiotic smelling, sensing, interacting and harmonizing. The Biosphere becomes Theosphere. Unfortunately today we are destroying nature continuously and calling it economic life. I am yet to see one book on Symbiotic Economics based on Free Ecology, the ecology not modeled on the lines of classical physics or simply Mechanics. When people become mechanized in outlook automatically they lose the capacity to sense which means the basic faculty of listening. Meetings become shouting fests, where every person tries to drown the voice of the other. The ears of all are closed, which means that one of the basic five senses, hearing, gets frozen and dysfunctional. And there is no helping flora and fauna, as all the organisms are terrorized into the economic livestock. When you just listen to someone, you help that person immensely. Similarly if you just feel love for any organism it senses the love via the air. Today thanks to economics we do not listen at all and of course the Biosphere is livestocked. We do not have any plan to again give freedom to nature, so that the macro symbiosis gets a chance. I have been writing to many Universities to start a Free Nature Park without human tampering so that nature gets the chance to create the macro symbiosis. But every university is under th frenzy of mechanization and governed by economics. The Universities are spewing antibiosis. YM Sarma Chat gpt Below is a constructive, respectful commentary that highlights the strengths of your essay while suggesting ways to make it clearer and more persuasive. ------------------------------ *Overall Comment* Your essay is imaginative, passionate, and philosophically rich. It blends ecology, physics, spirituality, and social dynamics to make an argument about how human interactions—and nature itself—depend on symbiosis rather than conflict. The piece stands out for its conceptual boldness and its moral conviction. At the same time, the essay would benefit from clearer structure, more precise language, and a distinction between metaphor and scientific description. Strengthening these aspects would make your core message easier for a broader audience to grasp. ------------------------------ *What Works Well* *1. Strong central metaphor* You use *heat*, *infrared radiation*, and *movement of molecules* as metaphors for emotional energy and collective atmosphere in meetings. This is evocative and helps the reader visualize group dynamics in a fresh way. *2. Philosophical depth* You connect ecology, spirituality, and human communication in a way that encourages the reader to reflect on how deeply interwoven all systems are—natural, social, and psychological. *3. Moral and ecological urgency* Your critique of “mechanization” and the dominance of economics adds emotional weight. The call for “Symbiotic Economics” and “Free Nature Parks” is striking and memorable. ------------------------------ *Where You Could Strengthen the Essay* *1. Clarify the line between science and metaphor* Statements such as *“the meeting develops its own macro heat energy”* are compelling as metaphors, but read literally they raise scientific questions. If you signal more clearly when you are speaking metaphorically or symbolically, your message becomes more persuasive and harder to dismiss. *2. Improve logical flow* The essay moves quickly from meetings → political waves → ecological symbiosis → spirituality → universities. These ideas connect, but clearer transitions would help the reader follow your reasoning. Consider framing the essay with a few guiding ideas, such as: - *Micro-level*: human interactions - *Macro-level*: natural ecosystems - *Societal-level*: institutions and economics This would help unify the different sections. *3. Specify key concepts* Words like *symbiosis*, *antibiosis*, *mechanization*, *Theosphere*, and *livestocked* are evocative, but you could define them more precisely or give examples. For instance: - What does a “symbiotic meeting” look like in practice? - What kinds of university policies exemplify “antibiosis”? - How would a “Symbiotic Economics” differ from current economics? Concrete illustrations would make abstract concepts feel grounded. *4. Tone and balance* Your essay expresses frustration with modern institutions—understandably—but occasionally the tone becomes accusatory. A slightly more balanced tone may help persuade skeptical readers. ------------------------------ *Possible Revision Strategy* 1. *Open with a clear thesis*—e.g., “Human gatherings reflect the same symbiotic or antagonistic energy patterns found in nature.” 2. *Use the heat metaphor*, but mark it as a metaphor. 3. *Connect the metaphor to real communication skills* (listening, sensing, cooperation). 4. *Extend the analogy to ecological and societal systems*, showing how symbiosis breaks down when mechanistic thinking dominates. 5. *End with a concrete proposal*, like the Free Nature Park concept. ------------------------------ *Closing* You are working with big, meaningful ideas—how assemblies of people, natural ecosystems, and spiritual harmony all depend on the same principle of symbiosis. With clearer structure and more explicit framing, the essay could become a powerful piece linking ecology and human culture. If you’d like, I can also help you *revise a paragraph*, *tighten the language*, or *prepare a more polished version for publication.* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLH50RqJAO42R-047NhTWoX%3DLUB5oYayC-W9zMYk77zAA%40mail.gmail.com.
