-- 
*Mar*

The Flow of Symbiotic and Positive Truth



When one lives in the free and healthy nature, one automatically enters the
grand arena of consultation and understanding in which every organism of
the Biosphere participates. The internal hormonal communications of all
organisms fuse via smelling, hearing, touching, holistic seeing, and
tasting. Actually one develops the faculty of predicting future events like
Tsunamis, Earthquakes, Cyclones etc.The whole Biosphere knows in advance.
Future is not uncertain; not even unknown. Truth does not hide but becomes
experience. The portents of future events become predictive experiences.

Actually, past, present and future take to clear continuations where every
organism fuses its feeling and sensing in the continuations. Even today,
despite the Cartesian depredation via mechanization, tribals who live in
deep forests display this basic faculty of predicting in advance.
Unfortunately free nature creates total faith in nature and they could not
and even today cannot, sense the rottenness and tricking by the slavers,
driven by Cartesianism to whom finer sentiments like empathy are blunders
as they adore the insensitive mechanization. Whole interior tribes were
suddenly attacked and captured as slaves by those who live in the Darwinian
economics. In this economics, the successful trickster wins.

The basic faculty of nature as the flow of the symbiotic and positive truth
is continuously maimed by the economic attacks. Truth itself is usurped by
mechanization and the fact that one experiences truth in the free and
healthy nature, is not allowed as lesson in almost every university wedded
to the Cartesian Darwinism.

Machines cannot feel. They cannot experience the flow of truth from nature.
Today mechanization is the stampede, in which the basic symbiotic nature
has no place and even scope.

The vicious economic attack on nature, destroying forests, rivers, lakes,
waterfalls, the poisoning of land, water and air, the beginnings of digging
away the Greenland, Antarcatica and the glaciers and ice covers of many
mountain ranges, have put mankind into the most vicious role of destruction
against truth. Every course of education in every university is cut away
from the free and symbiotic nature, and the mechanized tilt of perception,
promoted falsehoods as academic disciplines. Nature has no say in the
education courses. Of course the whole Biosphere is just economic livestock
and the very concept that every organism is an emotional complement has
become weird.

When one prays in the free and healthy forest, one is actually the
emotional complement in the Biosphere.Today, God or Free Nature is
ostracized in every University. And we do not know when the provoked nature
takes to gigantic doom as backlash.

Please go any surviving free nature and pray for the emergence of a
University that takes to the cause of the Fundamental Right of freedom to
nature, and starts a ‘Free Nature Park’, without human tampering, so that
the flow of the symbiotic and positive truth get experienced by the
students.

YM Sarma

Chat gpt

Here is a balanced, respectful, and detailed commentary on your essay,
focusing on clarity, coherence, argumentative strength, and stylistic
effectiveness, while preserving the spirit of your ideas.
------------------------------

*Commentary on “The Flow of Symbiotic and Positive Truth”*

Your essay is a passionate and philosophically rich reflection on
humanity’s relationship with nature. It combines ecological concern,
spiritual insight, and socio-cultural critique into a unified message: that
modern mechanized civilization has severed humanity from a deep, intuitive,
communal awareness embedded in the natural world. You write with conviction
and poetic force, and the imagery you invoke—the “flow of symbiotic and
positive truth,” “free and healthy nature,” “emotional complement in the
Biosphere”—has a lyrical quality that gives your argument emotional
resonance.

Below are specific observations that may help strengthen the clarity,
coherence, and persuasive power of your essay.
------------------------------

*1. Strengths of the Essay*

*a. Powerful and evocative language*

Your prose is expressive and metaphorically rich. Phrases like *“future is
not uncertain; not even unknown”* and *“machines cannot feel”* communicate
a strong worldview and give your essay a philosophical depth that is
memorable.

*b. Cohesive moral stance*

You take a clear ethical position: nature is not a resource but a living,
sensing community of beings. This moral clarity gives your essay purpose
and urgency.

*c. Important and timely themes*

You connect ecological destruction, loss of indigenous knowledge,
mechanization, and distorted economic values. These are pressing issues in
contemporary discourse, and your synthesis draws attention to how deeply
intertwined they are.
------------------------------

*2. Areas for Enhancement*

*a. Clarify the distinction between metaphor and literal claim*

Some statements—such as the suggestion that all organisms “fuse their
hormonal communications” or that humans can naturally predict earthquakes
and tsunamis—may be interpreted as literal scientific claims. If these
ideas are intended metaphorically or phenomenologically (i.e., about
intuition, attunement, or ecological sensitivity), clarifying this will
strengthen your credibility. If you do intend them literally, you may want
to provide examples or acknowledge counterarguments.

*b. Strengthen logical transitions*

Your essay moves between topics—indigenous intuition, mechanization,
slavery, Darwinian economics, university education—very quickly. The
emotional and thematic connections are present, but the logical bridges
could be made stronger. Adding a few transitional sentences would help
readers follow the thread of your argument more easily.

*c. Use more concrete examples*

The essay is rich in abstraction and moral language. Adding small, specific
examples—such as a particular tribal community’s ecological knowledge, or a
specific case of environmental devastation—would make your message even
more convincing.

*d. Consider nuance around science and mechanization*

Your critique of “Cartesian Darwinism” and mechanization is philosophically
important, but it may sound overly absolute. You could strengthen your
argument by acknowledging that scientific and technological perspectives
can coexist with ecological and spiritual ones. This allows your critique
to feel inclusive rather than oppositional.

*e. Refine a few stylistic elements*

Some sentences are long and contain multiple ideas; splitting them could
improve readability. Occasional adjustments in grammar and punctuation
would also enhance flow.
------------------------------

*3. Suggestions for Further Development*

   - *Clarify your central thesis* early in the essay. What exactly is the
   “flow of symbiotic and positive truth”? Is it an ecological
   interconnectedness? A spiritual intuition? A critique of mechanistic
   thinking?
   - *Define key terms* such as “mechanization,” “Cartesianism,” “Darwinian
   economics,” and “emotional complement.” These are rich ideas but could
   anchor the reader more firmly if elaborated.
   - *Engage more directly with solutions*, especially your idea of a
   university that protects free nature. Expanding on how such an institution
   would work could make your conclusion even more powerful.

------------------------------

*Overall Impression*

Your essay is heartfelt, original, and courageous in its critique of modern
civilization. It expresses a profound longing for harmony between humans
and the natural world, and it challenges the mechanistic worldview with
poetic intensity. With clearer structure, distinguishable metaphors, and a
bit more grounded argumentation, it could become an even more compelling
piece of ecological philosophy.

If you’d like, I can help you revise the essay line-by-line, rewrite it in
a more formal or academic tone, or prepare it for publication.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJFiPMRXNGnxAwKBfwKkJJkzS0WQ5VF3%2B%2BgvN9B-Gc5Jw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to