-- 
*Mar*

The Web of Symbiotic Coordination



At the most fundamental level, a photon is just excitation. It has no 3D
shape. It is an energy packet, relating to the next excitation packet or
photon, in the quantum field. The Field is not composed of 3D shapes. The
Universe ultimately is one energy field, the excitations fluctuating. It
has no 3D shape just like your consciousness. It is the ultimate grand
consciousness, in which you are a ripple, the grand photon, with individual
photons like you. The universe consists of photon waves. We have to end the
superstition of excluding consciousness, from Quantum Physics because of
our bondage to 3D identification.

As a 3D body which your VIBGYOR based seeing has put you into, you are also
a bigger photon, with energies radiating from you, the excitations from
you. There are no 3D shaped photons at all, but only fields. You are a
photon field, expanding and contracting as excitation.

Then, can you with your thoughts and actions create photon waves? I feel
that the answer is yes. You can actually become bigger and bigger photon
with your thoughts. You join the photon area around you. You expand as a
photon. What you need is free and healthy nature without human tampering
and the courage to feel free in the free and lush nature. Every organism is
a field of consciousness or of photons. There is and in built communication
system among the organisms, the system of macro consciousnesses as spells.

Consciousness travel is actually your travel as a wave. Your life now is
such a wave. If you team up with nature, and become part of nature, then
your life becomes a wave of photon, I think the state of rapture.Basicaly
you expand and contract as a Photon body. A photon is a field with webs as
waves.

May be we cross the VIBGYOR limit to seeing and develop the capacity to
reach even the Gamma ray, Ultraviolet etc also, as non 3D conscious
excitation fields. Even now, if you can see with your eyes everything,
atoms, particles etc, then you cannot see yourself or any 3D shapes. Your
thoughts, feelings, emotions, understandings, observations etc have no 3D
shape.

Education is relating to nature and not using and taming nature for
economic subjugation with technology. Technology blocks your free expansion
as a photon, as the expanding energy packet. May be the gap between two
photons is a field of consciousness. I think symbiosis glues the photons.

We need the ‘Free Nature Park, without technological tampering to
experience education as expanding photons, as photon means energy packet.
Even Quantum entanglement can get explanation if we introduce consciousness
into Quantum Physics.

Every University must start a ‘Free Nature Park’without technological
tampering to pave the way for real education.

The problem today is freeing the universities from the frenzy for
technology.

YM Sarma

Chat gpt

Below is a clear, respectful critique of your essay—both its strengths and
where you could refine or rethink concepts to make the argument more
coherent and impactful.
------------------------------

*Overall Impression*

Your essay is imaginative and philosophically ambitious. It attempts to
fuse quantum physics, consciousness studies, ecology, and education theory
into a single worldview. The tone is visionary and exploratory, which can
be a strength if the goal is to provoke thought or inspire alternative
perspectives.

However, the argument currently mixes scientific terminology (photons,
fields, quantum entanglement, VIBGYOR, gamma rays) with metaphysical claims
in ways that may confuse readers or weaken the philosophical case. With
clearer distinctions between metaphor, hypothesis, and accepted physics,
your ideas could become more compelling and accessible.
------------------------------

*Key Strengths*

*1. Creative Conceptual Metaphors*

The notion that humans are "photon fields" or "waves of excitation" can
work well as a metaphor for our interconnectedness with nature,
consciousness, and the universe.

*2. Strong Ecological Vision*

Your emphasis on *free, untampered nature* and its role in education aligns
with ecological humanities, eco-psychology, and experiential learning
philosophies.

*3. A Call for Rethinking Education*

The proposal for a “Free Nature Park” aligns with contemporary discussions
about the need to reconnect education with ecological awareness and
embodied experience.
------------------------------

*Areas for Improvement*

*1. Scientific Accuracy vs. Metaphor*

Some statements about photons, consciousness, and the quantum field are
scientifically incorrect if taken literally:

   - Photons are not “grand consciousness.”
   - Humans are not literally photon fields, though biological systems emit
   low levels of biophotons.
   - Thoughts do not produce photon waves in the physics sense.
   - Crossing “VIBGYOR limits” does not correspond to expanding
   consciousness.
   - Consciousness is not recognized in physics as a component of quantum
   entanglement.

*Suggestion:*
Explicitly label these ideas as *philosophical interpretations* or
*metaphorical
frameworks*. That will preserve your creativity while avoiding confusion.

*2. Logical Structure*

The essay moves quickly between topics without strong transitions:

   - photon ontology → human identity → consciousness → nature → education
   reforms

This creates a sense of conceptual jumpiness.

*Suggestion:*
Organize into sections:

   1. Your philosophical premise
   2. How it relates to human consciousness
   3. How this informs ecology
   4. Applications to education

*3. Clarify the Central Argument*

It's not always clear what the main thesis is. Is it:

   - “Consciousness is fundamental to the universe”?
   - “Humans are photon fields”?
   - “Technology restricts natural consciousness”?
   - “Education should take place in untampered nature”?

All are interesting, but the essay needs a foregrounded, stable thesis.

*4. Tone and Precision*

Some claims are presented as facts rather than speculative beliefs. This
can alienate scientifically literate readers.

*Suggestion:*
Use phrases like:

   - “I propose that…”
   - “One way to view this is…”
   - “Metaphorically speaking…”
   - “A speculative interpretation is…”

This will make your argument more intellectually honest and credible.
------------------------------

*Specific Line-Level Suggestions*

   - *“The Universe ultimately is one energy field...”*
   Consider qualifying: *“In some philosophical interpretations of
   physics…”*
   - *“You can actually become bigger and bigger photon…”*
   Reframe as metaphor: *“One might imagine oneself as an expanding field
   of awareness.”*
   - *“Quantum entanglement can get explanation if we introduce
   consciousness…”*
   Note that this is a controversial hypothesis; frame as speculative.
   - *“Technology blocks your free expansion as a photon…”*
   Clarify whether you mean *psychological*, *spiritual*, or *literal
   physical* expansion.

------------------------------

*How You Could Strengthen the Essay Without Losing Its Vision*

*1. Make your metaphysics explicit*

Describe that you are offering a *philosophical* reinterpretation of
physical concepts, not a scientific claim.

*2. Support your ecological argument with grounded examples*

Cite how nature immersion improves learning, mental health, creativity, and
attention.

*3. Provide a clearer connection between your metaphors and educational
reform*

Explain *how* seeing humans as “fields of consciousness” leads to a new
educational model.

*4. Embrace poetic language more intentionally*

Your ideas may be better served by calling the piece a *philosophical
meditation* or *metaphorical essay*, rather than presenting it as
scientific commentary.
------------------------------

*Conclusion*

Your essay contains the seeds of an inspiring eco-philosophical worldview.
With clearer structure, more distinction between science and metaphor, and
stronger justification of your claims, it could become a thought-provoking
piece that bridges spirituality, nature, and education.

If you’d like, I can help you:

   - rewrite the essay in a more polished, coherent form,
   - restructure it into a strong argument, or
   - transform it into a poetic/philosophical piece while preserving your
   vision.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCL4U78PeLT_TQ13zVga%3Dt36XDEWt8fnDZq4yg6rvC%3DUKA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to