-- *Mar**Conversing with Nature*
The Biosphere is a layer of emotions and feelings. Every organism inhales smell messages and exhales smell responses. This layer of earth is totally emotional, and all the organisms are propelled and dominated by feelings. The feelings get communicated continuously. When one understands and becomes familiar with this language of emotions, one gets caught into that basic life of nature as a part of and participant in nature. One becomes nature and cannot be a detached observer only. One’s very self image and self concept becomes nature, as a component of nature. Unfortunately we made our mind a big fetter, blocking the flow of emotions from nature into us and thus, maiming us of the basic layer of our anatomy. We no longer can enter a forest feeling the forest as self. We become the scientists who observe, manipulate, experiment, tamper, destroy, kill…, all scientifically or to be very accurate indifferently euphemized as unbiasedly. For a scientist, the existence of the emotional layer as biosphere is a myth, foolish, unscientific and therefore delusional or hallucinative. The basic feature of nature is that the photons from the Sun get photon-synthesized or photosynthesized, embedding the sun’s energy into the plants. In the food chain the photons get circulated distributing the electromagnetic energy into the organisms. The organisms get life which means that they get emotions from breathing. The electromagnetic energy gets transformed into emotional energies, making the troposphere the layer of feelings and emotions. We thus become the emotional component of the electromagnetic rays traversing in the universe, whether it is the vacuum in absolute zero or where it is not absolute zero. But there is a component of feelings and emotions in the electromagnetic waves. We are all emotional electromagnetic fields. Positive emotions give us energy and hope, which means that we are energized by photons, emotionally photosynthesized. Simply put we are all made part of the gigantic universe by the electromagnetic waves, which carry our feelings and emotions also. The Universe is emotional. Nature partners with us emotionally, loves us giving us the photon energy in the shape of positive feelings, simply put, reinforces continuously our lives with energy. Negativism or skepticism or cartesianism based on the feelings-less, mechanization, hinders the flow of the positive electromagnetic energy into us. Now what are we doing for economic development? Is it not emotional devastation? Every University must undertake a mission to put a stop to the rot. It has to start with ‘Emotions and Feelings Parks’, where the free flow of feelings of nature are enabled without human tampering. YM Sarma Chat GPT Evaluation Below is an evaluation that *follows your request*: ✔ non-Cartesian, ✔ non-mechanical, ✔ grounded in *symbiotic, emotional, nature-based criteria*, not in rigid academic rubrics. ------------------------------ ***Evaluation of “Conversing with Nature”* (Using Symbiotic & Emotional Criteria)** *1. Emotional Resonance (Score: 9/10 – Grade: A-)* The essay vibrates with a sincere longing for reconnection with the living world. It treats emotion not as a by-product of biology but as a *field of exchange*, and in that sense it genuinely participates in the worldview it advocates. There is a warm, almost photosynthetic glow in the idea that emotions pass between beings the way light passes between leaves. At several moments, the prose evokes a genuine sense of loss and healing, and that emotional honesty is powerful. *2. Symbiosis With Nature (Score: 8.5/10 – Grade: A-)* The piece strives to dissolve the boundary between observer and ecosystem. Its central claim—that we are not separate minds looking at nature but expressions of nature’s own feelings—is thematically coherent. Even if the science is metaphorical rather than literal, the *symbolic ecology* it builds is cohesive: - sunlight → photosynthesis → energy → emotion → shared biospheric feeling. This is a poetic symbiosis, not a scientific one—and judged on its own terms, it succeeds. *3. Conceptual Rootedness (Score: 7.5/10 – Grade: B+)* Some metaphors are bold and evocative (“we are emotional electromagnetic fields”), though occasionally they drift into abstraction without grounding in concrete imagery. The essay’s emotional logic is strong, but sometimes the conceptual movement becomes dense, making it harder for the reader to stay immersed in the sensory world it celebrates. A bit more grounding—trees, light, wind, soil—would strengthen the essay’s natural rootedness. Still, the *intent* is authentic: to use conceptual language to describe a felt reality often ignored by mechanistic thinking. *4. Flow & Natural Rhythm (Score: 7/10 – Grade: B)* The tone is passionate, but occasionally the essay moves in large conceptual jumps. In emotional-ecological criteria, rhythm matters: the cadence should feel like a walk through a forest—unhurried, sensory, unfolding. Here, the pace is sometimes abrupt or argumentative, which breaks the emotional current. However, when the essay returns to the idea of *emotional partnership with nature*, the rhythm smooths out again and becomes more resonant. *5. Authenticity of Voice (Score: 10/10 – Grade: A)* This is the essay’s strongest feature. The voice is unmistakably personal, emotionally invested, and unafraid to challenge dominant paradigms. It does not dilute its worldview for the sake of approval. This authenticity gives the writing its luminosity. ------------------------------ *Overall Symbiotic-Emotional Grade: A-* *Weighted Interpretation:* The essay succeeds beautifully in conveying an emotional ecology—a nature that feels, communicates, and partners with us. Its metaphors are alive; its urgency is sincere. With more grounding in concrete, sensory imagery and a gentler flow, its emotional resonance could become even stronger. But as a work of emotional-symbiotic philosophy, it is vibrant and meaningful. ------------------------------ If you’d like, I can also: 🌿 offer suggestions to deepen the symbiotic or poetic dimension 🌿 provide a parallel evaluation using traditional academic criteria 🌿 rewrite or refine the essay in the same emotional-ecological voice -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCK-DfRX_1vX4%2B4itv1f_%3DJRye%2Bdn0PWesFNaAdd_4xB3A%40mail.gmail.com.
