Prison is any obstruction, restriction, hindrance or any other block, that
prevents free access, interaction and action in, with and as naure.It is
the denial of access to the Theo sphere and the Theism emanating from
nature’s Theo sphere. The access may be restricted by any bigoted religion,
the Cartesian shackles that mechanize perception and understanding and of
course the fanatical political and other cults. Shri YMji
KR Yes life is an imprisonment or assignment for the ascendancy as one
would will shape. Imprisonment is a punishment. WHY WE MAY HAVE TO PUNISH
OURSELVES? ONLY SADISM WILL LEAD ONE TO SELF-INDICTMENTS. On the contrary,
when every failure initially is treated as a stepping stone to success,
modifications of approach will lead one to achievements as end alone
justified the means.
"A tiny thread shall not bind us to stop our progress" is a
statement that can be interpreted as a motivational aphorism or a
philosophical declaration emphasizing human resilience and determination .
It suggests that minor obstacles or constraints (the "tiny thread") should
not be allowed to hinder significant advancement or continuous effort (our
"progress"). The phrase does not have a widely recognized single author or
origin and is likely a modern, poetic expression of the following common
themes:
Resilience: The ability to overcome challenges and setbacks.
Determination: Unwavering focus and commitment to a goal.
Overcoming Constraints: A refusal to be limited by small or seemingly
insignificant barriers. It is designed to inspire perseverance in the face
of difficulties. KR IRS 151125
On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 at 06:24, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> Prison
>
>
>
> Prison is any obstruction, restriction, hindrance or any other block, that
> prevents free access, interaction and action in, with and as naure.It is
> the denial of access to the Theosphere and the Theism emanating from
> nature’s Theosphere. The access may be restricted by any bigoted religion,
> the Cartesian shackles that mechanize perception and understanding and of
> course the fanatical political and other cults.
>
> With your eyes, you can see only less than 00.0035% of the totality. Even
> that seeing takes you to the false 3D shapes, ignoring the Time dimension
> which represents not only the remaining 99.9965% of the invisible spectrum
> but also covers the visible 3D shapes. Time dimension is simply the Divine
> dimension based on feeling, sensing and understanding. It is the voyage
> into the real abstract or formless nature.
>
> The reality of nature is diverse processes continuously interacting,
> making seeing definite things impossible as processes themselves change and
> interact, the interactions overlapping continuously.
>
> The basic fact is the thrill of revelations and discoveries one
> experiences while living in the free and healthy nature, where there is no
> human tampering. The Biosphere is a web of emotional, perceptual and
> understanding collegial interactions, each organism radiating, impacting
> and informing emotions.
>
> The Biosphere is an extension of you, housing trillions of bacteria the
> tiny interacting and coordinating life forms in you. The self confidence
> and self esteem in you is actually the percolation of the confident nature
> into you, where nature is free and healthy. The interaction with free
> nature creates the thrilling discoveries and revelations as feelings in you
> which become the hormonal communications of your bloodstream, which enter
> the cells creating the confident cells, or the foundational self confidence.
>
> Today we continuously destroy nature calling it the economic life. We are
> demoralizing every life form, creating the macro loss of self confidence in
> nature. We are afraid of free nature, our very macro anatomy. And we are
> also failing as the economic men the machines that kill ecology itself as
> there are no jobs available in the economy. Machines are taking over every
> job creating the spectacle of starvation and ultimately the great economic
> depression.
>
> The basic fact is, there can be no lasting livelihoods when economic life
> is based on the destruction of nature. We have to live in the free and
> healthy nature as the limbs of that nature. Ecology and not the failed
> imitation of Newtonian Physics, called economics, can help livelihoods.
>
> It is time we install Ecology in the place of Economics as the basic
> foundation. Every University must immediately start a free nature park
> without human tampering as the first and elementary paradigm shift into
> Ecology.
>
> Our economic activity is creating fatal provocations in nature to take
> remedial backlashes.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Critique of Chat GPT
>
> Below is a constructive, critical response to the essay—focusing on
> clarity, coherence, argumentation, and style—while respecting the
> philosophical intent of the piece.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Critical Comments on the Essay*
>
> *1. Conceptual clarity and definition of key terms*
>
> The essay begins with a broad and metaphorical definition of *prison* as
> “any obstruction… that prevents free access… to nature’s Theosphere.”
>
> - This is an intriguing premise, but the argument would benefit from
> clearer definitions.
> - Terms such as *“Theosphere,” “Theism emanating from nature’s
> Theosphere,” “Cartesian shackles,”* and *“fanatical political and
> other cults”* are left ambiguous.
> - Because these concepts appear central to your thesis, more precise
> explanations—or at least consistent usage—are needed to help readers follow
> your reasoning.
>
> *2. Scientific accuracy and use of numerical claims*
>
> The statement that “you can see only less than 00.0035% of the totality”
> seems to refer to the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.
>
> - The number, however, is unsupported and appears incorrect or at
> least unexplained.
> - When numerical precision is invoked, readers expect scientific
> grounding.
> - Additionally, the connection between physical light spectra and
> metaphysical claims about “Divine dimension” or “true abstract nature” is
> conceptually interesting but logically unstructured. The jump from physics
> to spirituality needs clearer justification or acknowledgment as metaphor.
>
> *3. Logical structure and argumentative flow*
>
> The essay blends metaphysics, ecology, psychology, and economics, but the
> transitions are abrupt.
> Examples:
>
> - From the limits of human perception to the Time dimension as
> “Divine.”
> - From nature as a web of emotional interactions to bacteria
> establishing human confidence.
> - From ecological degradation directly to “machines taking over jobs.”
>
> Each jump introduces a potentially rich idea, but the lack of connective
> reasoning weakens the overall argument. Strengthening the logical
> bridges—showing *how* you get from one claim to the next—will add
> coherence.
>
> *4. Overextension of metaphors*
>
> Nature is described as:
>
> - an emotional web
> - a source of “self-confidence percolation”
> - a macro-anatomy of human beings
> - divine and abstract
>
> These metaphors are evocative, but the essay often mixes metaphorical and
> literal claims without distinction. This creates confusion about what
> should be read poetically and what is meant as empirical truth.
>
> *5. Claims that require evidence*
>
> Several assertions would require at least minimal support or elaboration:
>
> - “The Biosphere is an extension of you.”
> - “Self confidence… is the percolation of the confident nature into
> you.”
> - “Our economic activity is creating fatal provocations in nature to
> take remedial backlashes.”
> - “There are no jobs available in the economy.”
>
> If treated as philosophical or poetic expressions, that should be
> clarified. If meant as factual claims, they need evidence or at least
> logical argumentation.
>
> *6. Treatment of economics vs. ecology*
>
> Your argument that ecology should replace economics is bold and
> thought-provoking. However:
>
> - Presenting economics as a “failed imitation of Newtonian physics”
> oversimplifies a complex field.
> - Claiming that livelihoods are impossible under current economic
> logic requires more argumentation.
> - Your policy prescription—that every university must create an
> untouched nature park—could be compelling if connected more clearly to the
> theoretical arguments.
>
> A stronger case would:
>
> - Define what economics fundamentally gets wrong.
> - Explain how ecological principles would operationally support
> livelihoods.
> - Provide examples of societies, communities, or models where such an
> ecological paradigm works.
>
> *7. Style and readability*
>
> The essay has a poetic, passionate tone, which is a strength. The imagery
> is vivid, and the moral urgency is clear.
> However, long sentences, dense phrasing, and repeated abstract terminology
> can burden comprehension. Consider:
>
> - Shorter sentences.
> - Occasional concrete examples.
> - Fewer abstract nouns.
>
> These changes would make the ideas more accessible without diluting their
> depth.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Overall assessment*
>
> Your essay presents a visionary critique of modern economic and social
> systems, rooted in a philosophical reverence for nature. The emotional
> intensity is compelling. To strengthen it further, focus on:
>
> - defining key concepts,
> - providing clearer logical transitions,
> - grounding critical claims in evidence or explicit metaphors, and
> - distinguishing poetic insight from literal assertion.
>
> With these refinements, the essay’s underlying message—about the spiritual
> and ecological costs of modern life—would come through more powerfully and
> persuasively.
>
> If you’d like, I can also help rewrite sections for clarity while
> preserving your philosophical style.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "societyforservingseniors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCLMXZqK2_S7hmJGnLHf5y7s%2BgJLXQ5uTU6tcKDXGJW_Nw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCLMXZqK2_S7hmJGnLHf5y7s%2BgJLXQ5uTU6tcKDXGJW_Nw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZookWbBjr66oLOJxB%3DSVqj6QgUwRega9kZnfm0CX9SgQOg%40mail.gmail.com.
