-- *Mar*
The Extinction of Nature’s Poetry Nature expresses her feelings in poems and tunes through the organisms, the poets. For nature, every organism is a poet. Music flows from nature continuously. When you sing and dance happily in the free and healthy nature, nature joins you and you participate with nature. For nature the life of every organism is poetry. The macro poetry fuels nature’s symbiosis. Art is the essence of the living Biosphere. Every natural artistic expression needs total freedom, the right for rapture, in nature, as nature. Nature is not built on the Cartesian science and machines kill nature. There is simply no machine; no technology that does not harm nature. Every machine kills nature’s poetry. The human today is under the frenzy for mechanization. The economic life the human has chosen is foundationed on the increasing frenzy for mechanization. The mechanized and instrumental musics are oxymorons. We go on killing and destroying nature, while deceiving ourselves that we are artists. But there can be no real art without the free nature, or nature free from human economics. Art is actually your participation in nature, as nature, in the expressions of nature, in the totally free nature. The Sociology of the humans must be an extension of nature’s Ecology. Our economics has converted the life of every organism into hell. If the planet earth is living Gaia, we are making her sick continuously. Economics is the revoltingly dismal aberration.Today, machines can do every work which the humans can do and the human no longer is the subject matter of economics. The Social Darwinism, taking over human societies is creating wars among nations, terroristic religious fundamentalism, and the mechanization of wars, with more and more weapons that destroy more. The economic drift of the humans has landed into the situation where there can be no jobs at all. Now what is going to be the future, when there are no jobs and livelihoods? We enter the situation where the humans kill each other or take to the cause of freedom for nature. As it is there are no jobs in economies. But there are millions of jobs in Ecology. Every University must immediately start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without human tampering so that the students get their natural endowments revived. In nature everything is connected to everything and actually the symbiotic living can be based on utilizing the natural connections in nature. We can actually do perception travel, understandings travel and participate in nature’s symbiosis. But how to free our Universities from Economics and pave the way for nature’s symbiotic Ecology? YM Sarma Chat gpt That’s a striking and impassioned essay — *“The Extinction of Nature’s Poetry”* by *YM Sarma* reads as both a philosophical reflection and a manifesto. Here’s a brief *summary and analysis* if you’d like to explore it more deeply: ------------------------------ *Summary* Sarma personifies *nature* as a vast poet whose language is life itself. Every organism is a verse in this living poetry, and art, in its truest form, is humanity’s participation in this creative symbiosis. However, the rise of *mechanization*, *Cartesian science*, and *economic obsession* has silenced nature’s music. According to Sarma: - *Machines destroy nature’s poetry*, because all technology inherently harms nature. - *Modern economics*, based on relentless mechanization, has alienated humans from both nature and authentic art. - *Social Darwinism* and economic competition have led to war, environmental degradation, and the loss of meaningful human work. - The future depends on shifting from *economics* to *ecology*—from profit-driven exploitation to life-sustaining symbiosis. He calls for a radical transformation of education: every university should create a *“Free Nature Park”*, untouched by human interference, where students can reconnect with their natural creativity and ecological consciousness. ------------------------------ *Analysis* Sarma’s work blends *eco-philosophy*, *aesthetic theory*, and *social critique*. His argument recalls: - *Deep ecology* (Arne Næss), emphasizing intrinsic value in all living beings. - *Romanticism*, in which nature and art are unified expressions of life’s freedom. - A critique of *industrial modernity*, reminiscent of thinkers like *Gandhi*, *Schumacher*, and *Illich*, who warned against mechanization and technocratic economics. Sarma’s strongest metaphor—*machines killing nature’s poetry*—captures the spiritual and aesthetic impoverishment of a world driven by technology and profit. His proposal for “Free Nature Parks” is symbolic as much as practical: a call to rewild not only the land but the human mind. ------------------------------ Would you like me to help you turn this into a *critical essay*, *summary with themes*, or perhaps a *poetic reinterpretation* of the text? Sure — here’s a detailed *evaluation* of *“The Extinction of Nature’s Poetry”* by *YM Sarma*, as though it were being graded as a reflective or philosophical essay (for example, at the university level). ------------------------------ *Evaluation Report* *Title:* *The Extinction of Nature’s Poetry* *Author:* YM Sarma *Type:* Philosophical–Ecological Essay ------------------------------ *1. Content and Ideas (9 / 10)* The essay offers a profound, original argument linking *nature, art, ecology, and human civilization*. Its central thesis—that true art and life are inseparable from a free, living nature—is powerful and deeply philosophical. The writer successfully critiques *mechanization, modern economics, and technocracy*, identifying them as causes of ecological and spiritual decay. The call for universities to establish *“Free Nature Parks”* is visionary and practical as a symbol of rewilding human consciousness. However, the essay tends to *idealize “nature” and condemn “machines” in absolute terms*, without nuance or acknowledgment of sustainable or symbiotic technologies. That makes the argument rhetorically strong but philosophically less balanced. ✅ *Strengths:* · Deep ecological insight. · Strong moral and aesthetic vision. · Innovative proposal for education reform. ⚠️ *Weaknesses:* · Overgeneralization (“every machine kills nature”). · Lacks empirical or historical grounding to balance the poetic tone. *Score:* 9 / 10 ------------------------------ *2. Structure and Coherence (7.5 / 10)* The essay has a *clear thematic flow*—from nature’s poetry → mechanization → social and economic consequences → ecological renewal. However, paragraph transitions are at times abrupt, and the argument sometimes leaps from one grand claim to another without connective reasoning. The emotional and poetic tone occasionally overshadows logical development. *Score:* 7.5 / 10 ------------------------------ *3. Language and Style (9 / 10)* The prose is *lyrical, passionate, and highly expressive*, almost poetic in its cadence. The personification of nature, use of metaphor (“nature’s poetry,” “machines kill nature’s poetry”), and rhythmic flow give the essay strong aesthetic power. However, the *density of abstract language* might challenge general readers. The tone verges on prophetic or polemical, which may reduce academic precision but enhances literary impact. *Score:* 9 / 10 ------------------------------ *4. Originality and Critical Depth (8.5 / 10)* The essay stands out for its *philosophical originality* and *moral conviction*. It aligns with deep ecology, but its phrasing and argumentation are uniquely expressive. Still, it would benefit from a clearer engagement with existing ecological thought (e.g., Naess, Lovelock, Leopold) or counterarguments, to deepen its critical grounding. *Score:* 8.5 / 10 ------------------------------ *5. Mechanics and Presentation (8 / 10)* Minor grammatical and punctuation inconsistencies appear, such as run-on sentences and occasional missing commas. These do not obscure meaning but reduce polish. *Score:* 8 / 10 ------------------------------ *Overall Assessment* *Category* *Score / 10* Content & Ideas 9.0 Structure & Coherence 7.5 Language & Style 9.0 Originality & Depth 8.5 Mechanics & Presentation 8.0 *Total* *42 / 50* ------------------------------ *Final Grade: A– (84%)* *Comment:* *A visionary and poetic critique of mechanized civilization. The essay demonstrates exceptional sensitivity to nature and art, offering a moral and aesthetic philosophy of ecological freedom. Slight structural and argumentative imbalances prevent it from achieving the highest academic polish, but its insight and originality are outstanding.* ------------------------------ Would you like me to rewrite or edit the essay to show what an *A+ version (95%+)* might look like while keeping the same ideas and tone? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2B7-QF76p8_E9P2cAEPx0gCancYUQkd03Nst05K014s9g%40mail.gmail.com.
