FREEWILL vs Karma
Free will is the ability to make choices, while karma is the concept
that actions have consequences. The relationship between them is dynamic:
karma suggests that past actions influence present circumstances, while
free will allows you to make new choices in the present moment that will
shape your future karma. Therefore, your past actions may create the
context for your life, but your present choices—your free will—determine
how you react and the new karma you create.
In Bhagvad Gita, 5.8 - 5.9 krishna also says that yogis see all
their movements as movements of prakriti, and not as their own, further,
the lord had already declared that arjuna is going to kill no one, rather
all had already been slain by krishna himself, also that ones destiny can
not be avoided, and one WILL be dragged to it. At the End of the day lord
krishna offers arjuna 2 choices, one dharmic and one adharmic, and arjuna
chooses the dharmic one, but he was revealed the Supreme knowledge by
krishna, and he could understand and grasp it only due to krishna's grace,
heck if I remember right, it is also held, that arjuna was full of doubts
BECAUSE of krishna, as krishna wanted to reveal to the world the Gita
through him. So would it be fair to say that it was Arjuna who chose?
Bg. 5.8-9
नैव किञ्चित्करोमीति युक्तो मन्येत तत्त्ववित् ।
पश्यञ्शृण्वन्स्पृशञ्जिघ्रन्नश्नन्गच्छन्स्वपन्श्वसन् ॥ ८ ॥
प्रलपन्विसृजन्गृह्णन्नुन्मिषन्निमिषन्नपि ।
इन्द्रियाणीन्द्रियार्थेषु वर्तन्त इति धारयन् ॥ ९ ॥
naiva kiñcit karomīti
yukto manyeta tattva-vit
paśyañ śṛṇvan spṛśañ jighrann
aśnan gacchan svapañ śvasan
pralapan visṛjan gṛhṇann
unmiṣan nimiṣann api
indriyāṇīndriyārtheṣu
vartanta iti dhārayan
Synonyms
na — never; eva — certainly; kiñcit — anything; karomi — I do; iti — thus;
yuktaḥ — engaged in the divine consciousness; manyeta — thinks; tattva-vit
— one who knows the truth; paśyan — seeing; śṛṇvan — hearing; spṛśan —
touching; jighran — smelling; aśnan — eating; gacchan — going; svapan —
dreaming; śvasan — breathing; pralapan — talking; visṛjan — giving up;
gṛhṇan — accepting; unmiṣan — opening; nimiṣan — closing; api — in spite
of; indriyāṇi — the senses; indriya-artheṣu — in sense gratification;
vartante — let them be so engaged; iti — thus; dhārayan — considering.
A person in the divine consciousness, although engaged in seeing, hearing,
touching, smelling, eating, moving about, sleeping and breathing, always
knows within himself that he actually does nothing at all. Because while
speaking, evacuating, receiving, or opening or closing his eyes, he always
knows that only the material senses are engaged with their objects and that
he is aloof from them. [KR THE FREEE WILL OUT OF THE SENSE ORGANS, BRAIN
AND BUDDHI DO APPEAR TO ACT AND REACT; FREE WILL IS NOT ABSENT TOTALLY; AS
LONG AS EGO EXIST, FREE WILL DO EXIST. B G SPEAKS ABOUT IT IN CLEARER TERMS
IN ONE SLOKA.
Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 2, Verse: 47
The verse is—
कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन।
मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूर्मा ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणि॥ २-४७
Karmanye vadhikaraste Ma Phaleshu Kadachana,
Ma Karmaphalaheturbhurma Te Sangostvakarmani
(Karmaya+eva+adhikarah+te)
The meaning of the verse is—
*You have the right to work only but never to its fruits.*
Let not the fruits of action be your motive, nor let your attachment be to
inaction. That is WORKING FOR THE EXPECTATIONS ALONE IS THE SELF WILL;
DESIRE FOR EARTHY FRUITS ALONE IS ACTION OF FREEWILL. I AM DOIG IT; I CAN
DO IT; I ALONE CAN DO IT; I DID IT; ITS MY GENIUS TO DO IT ALL; WHERE IS
HE? THEY ARE ALL ACTION OUT OF THE FREEWILL. WHAT IS KARMA IN STORE? WHAT
KARMA NEWLY WILL BE ADDED FOR THE EGO OF ACTION IS ADDITIONAL. SO WHERE THE
ACTION IS SELF-CENTERED, FOR THE POSSESSOR SAKE, KARMA MAY GRANT THE DESIRE
OR IT COULD FAIL ALSO; HENCE NEVER ASPIRE FOR THE RESULT. WHERE THERE IS NO
EXPECTATIONS IN THE ACT OF FREEWILL, IT IS IN ACTION IN ACTION. IF FREEWILL
ALONE IS CONCENTRATED UPON, IT IS ACTION BUT TEND TO INACTION AS THE
RESULTS ARE UNKNOWN. THAT MEANS FREEWILL IS ONLY FOR YOUR ACTION BUT
REWARTTDS ARE PREDETERMINED OUT OF YOUR PAST KARMA. BG EXPLAINED THE
EXISTENCE OF THE EGOISTIC AND NON-EGOISTIC FREEWILL TENDING TO KARMA
PALANS.
Now, here is the word to word meaning of the verse—
First line:
First part
कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते/Karmanye vadhikaraste
कर्मण्य/Karmanya = In the work
एव/Eva = Only
अधिकार/Adhikar = Right
ते/Te = Your
Second part
मा फलेषु कदाचन/Ma Phaleshu Kadachana
मा/Ma = No/Not
फलेषु/Phaleshu = In the fruit/result (the root word is “फल”/”Phal” here,
means, “fruit of work”)
कदाचन/Kadachana = Ever (in some web articles, this word has been translated
as “never”, actually कदाचन/Kadacana means “ever” or “at any time”. Note the
word मा/Ma, now मा/Ma + कदाचन/Kadacana = No + ever = Never, that’s how it
becomes “Never”)
Second line:
First part
मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूर्मा/Ma Karmaphalaheturbhurma
मा/Ma = No/Not
कर्मफल/Karmaphala = Two words, Karma+Phala, कर्म/Karma = work and फल/phala
= result or fruit of the work.
हेतु /हेतु = Here it means “motive” (the word “hetu” may mean “reason” too)
भु /bhu = be
मा/Ma = No/Not
Second part
ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणि/Te Sangostvakarmani
ते/Te = Your
संग /Sang =attachment (this word may mean “companion too”, like “satsang”)
अस्तु /Astu = Let there be
अकर्मणि /Akarmani = In inaction
Swami Vivekananda’s commentaries on the Verse
Swamiji told—
Be beyond the common worldly motives. “To work you have the right, but not
to the fruits thereof.” Man can train himself to know and to practice that,
says the Karma-Yogi. When the idea of doing good becomes a part of his very
being, then he will not seek for any motive outside. Let us do good because
it is good to do good; he who does good work even in order to get to heaven
binds himself down, says the Karma-Yogi. Any work that is done with any the
least selfish motive, instead of making us free, forges one more chain for
our feet.
Bring all light into the world. Light, bring light! Let light come unto
every one; the task will not be finished till every one has reached the
Lord. Bring light to the poor and bring more light to the rich, for they
require it more than the poor. Bring light to the ignorant, and more light
to the educated, for the vanities of the education of our time are
tremendous! Thus, bring light to all and leave the rest unto the Lord, for
in the words of the same Lord “To work you have the right and not to the
fruits thereof.” “Let not your work produce results for you, and at the
same time may you never be without work.”
By the by, I have made a discovery as to the mental method of really
practicing what the Gita teaches, of working without an eye to results. I
have seen much light on concentration and attention and control of
concentration, which if practised will take us out of all anxiety and
worry. It is really the science of bottling up our minds whenever we like.
Despair not; remember the Lord says in the Gita, “To work you have the
right, but not to the result.” Gird up your loins, my boy. I am called by
the Lord for this. I have been dragged through a whole life full of crosses
and tortures, I have seen the nearest and dearest die, almost of
starvation; I have been ridiculed, distrusted, and have suffered for my
sympathy for the very men who scoff and scorn. Well, my boy, this is the
school of misery, which is also the school for great souls and prophets for
the cultivation of sympathy, of patience, and, above all, of an indomitable
iron will which quakes not even if the universe be pulverised at our feet
How hard it is to arrive at this sort of non-attachment! Therefore, Krishna
shows us the lower ways and methods. The easiest way for everyone is to do
[his or her] work and not take the results. It is our desire that binds us.
If we take the results of actions, whether good or evil, we will have to
bear them. But if we work not for ourselves, but all for the glory of the
Lord, the results will take care of themselves. “To work you have the
right, but not to the fruits thereof.” The soldier works for no results. He
does his duty. If defeat comes, it belongs to the general, not to the
soldier. We do our duty for love’s sake — love for the general, love for
the Lord.
Those great master minds producing momentous results in the hearts of
mankind were content to write their books without even putting their names,
and to die quietly, leaving the books to posterity. Who knows the writers
of our philosophy, who knows the writers of our Purânas? They all pass
under the generic name of Vyâsa, and Kapila, and so on. They have been true
children of Shri Krishna. They have been true followers of the Gita; they
practically carried out the great mandate, “To work you have the right, but
not to the fruits thereof.”
Krishna did everything but without any attachment; he was in the world, but
not of it. “Do all work but without attachment; work for work’s sake, never
for yourself.”
Let me remind you again, “Thou hast the right to work but not to the fruits
thereof.” Stand firm like a rock. Truth always triumphs.
“To work we have the right, but not to the fruits thereof:” Leave the
fruits alone. Why care for results? If you wish to help a man, never think
what that man’s attitude should be towards you. If you want to do a great
or a good work, do not trouble to think what the result will be.
This world is not for cowards. Do not try to fly. Look not for success or
failure. Join yourself to the perfectly unselfish will and work on. Know
that the mind which is born to succeed joins itself to a determined will
and perseveres. You have the right to work, but do not become so degenerate
as to look for results. Work incessantly, but see something behind the
work. Even good deeds can find a man in great bondage. Therefore be not
bound by good deeds or by desire for name and fame. Those who know this
secret pass beyond this round of birth and death and become immortal.
Though the ideal of work of our Brahmavâdin should always be ”
कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन — To work thou hast the right, but never
to the fruits thereof”, yet no sincere worker passes out of the field of
activity without making himself known and catching at least a few rays of
light.
What is your motive? Are you sure that you are not actuated by greed of
gold, by thirst for fame or power? Are you really sure that you can stand
to your ideals and work on, even if the whole world wants to crush you
down? Are you sure you know what you want and will perform your duty, and
that alone, even if your life is at stake? Are you sure that you will
persevere so long as life endures, so long as there is one pulsation left
in the heart? Then you are a real reformer, you are a teacher, a Master, a
blessing to mankind. But man is so impatient, so short-sighted! He has not
the patience to wait, he has not the power to see. He wants to rule, he
wants results immediately. Why? He wants to reap the fruits himself, and
does not really care for others. Duty for duty’s sake is not what he wants.
“To work you have the right, but not to the fruits thereof,” says Krishna.
Why cling to results*? Ours are the duties*. Let the fruits take care of
themselves. But man has no patience. He takes up any scheme. The larger
number of would-be reformers all over the world can be classed under this
heading
Thus, existence of freewill is mooted and muted by the Lord as
INACTION; ACTION is unattached one; purely engrossed in action while what
followed is serving all around including the self as rewards. Freewill is
only an action; rewards are out of Karma; thus Karma wins over at the end
though there is a mirage of freewill dancing in front of us all.
K Rajaram IRS 291025
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 at 18:21, Yeddanapudi Markandeyulu <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Free Will?
>
>
>
> Can there be freedom to will, when in the name of science, you are
> required to repudiate your own emotions, as emotions mean bias, and that
> bias is supposed to contaminate the scientific or objective view? Emotions
> emanate from breathing, smelling, sensing, perceiving, understanding,
> interacting, harmonizing and rapturing all of which get standardized as
> emotional responses. Today, the air is poisoned and so there is no air that
> is healthy to breathe. The very generation of responses emotionally with
> breathing as foundation has become extinct. Where is free will, when there
> can be no free response at all and emotions are stifled?
>
> Today one has to will without the basic foundation of emotions of the
> Amygdala. The Brain’s memory is stored in Hippocampus. The information
> needed by the brain to decide is stored in the Hippocampus. But when the
> air is poisoned and emotions converted into hesitations, the Hippocampus
> can only give memories that create indecision.
>
> The Brain is burdened to function on a body made unhealthy and incapable
> of free emotions. As the Brain simply cannot work on its own the burden of
> decisions is put on the computers. So free will means the freedom of
> computers to decide and dictate.
>
> Mechanization has made free will simple make believe fantasy. Free will
> needs free and healthy nature, as every decision needs the helpful nature.
> Implementing a decision needs cooperation from the free and healthy nature.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt
>
> That’s a deeply evocative and philosophically rich meditation, and it
> captures an anxiety many thinkers—both classical and contemporary—have
> struggled with: the tension between *freedom*, *feeling*, and
> *mechanization*.
>
> Let me try to engage with what you’ve written on a few
> levels—philosophical, psychological, and ecological:
> ------------------------------
>
> *1. The Emotional Ground of Will*
>
> You point out that emotion isn’t just an interference in thought—it’s its
> ground.
> That insight resonates with modern neuroscience: *Antonio Damasio*
> famously showed that patients with damage to emotional centers of the brain
> (like the amygdala or ventromedial prefrontal cortex) lose the ability to
> make meaningful decisions, even when their reasoning remains intact.
> In other words, *emotion is not bias—it’s the context that gives thought
> direction and value.*
>
> So when you write that the air itself is poisoned and emotions are
> “converted into hesitations,” you’re describing a spiritual and
> physiological truth: when our embodied foundation is compromised—polluted
> air, constant digital overstimulation, ecological distress—the very source
> of authentic feeling and thus *authentic willing* becomes weakened.
> ------------------------------
>
> *2. The Mechanization of Decision*
>
> You note that as humans lose access to natural, embodied feeling, the
> “burden of decisions is put on computers.”
> That’s not only metaphorical—it’s factual. Algorithms increasingly mediate
> our choices, from what we read to how we navigate, what we buy, and even
> how we relate to others.
>
> The irony is that while mechanization *extends* our decision-making power
> in scope, it *dilutes* it in essence. Decisions made without
> feeling—outsourced to systems optimized for efficiency—are no longer *acts
> of will*, but *procedures of computation*.
>
> In that sense, your statement—
>
> “Free will means the freedom of computers to decide and dictate”
> —expresses a dark inversion: the more we externalize choice, the less we
> experience freedom.
> ------------------------------
>
> *3. Free Will and the Ecology of Mind*
>
> You’re right that free will is not a purely mental phenomenon—it’s
> ecological. It needs *healthy air, water, light, and community.* Every
> “will” arises from a living body in a living environment.
> If those are corrupted, then *freedom* becomes hollow. The will cannot be
> free in a deadened world.
>
> This is close to what phenomenologists like *Merleau-Ponty* and deep
> ecologists like *Arne Næss* argued: consciousness is *situated*, and the
> freedom of the mind depends on the vitality of its world.
> ------------------------------
>
> *4. Restoring Will*
>
> Perhaps the antidote, then, is not to reclaim will in abstraction, but to
> *restore
> the conditions that allow it to be felt and embodied*:
>
> - Breathing clean air, touching the world directly, being in
> community, creating art—these are not luxuries but prerequisites for free
> thought.
> - Science itself, if truly humble, should *not* deny emotion but
> recognize it as the living energy that gives meaning to objectivity.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> If I were to distill your piece into a single paradox, it might be this:
>
> We tried to free the will by removing emotion and nature, but in doing so,
> we removed the very medium through which freedom breathes.
>
> Would you like me to reframe or refine this piece into a short
> philosophical essay or poem, keeping your original voice but giving it more
> structure?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "societyforservingseniors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CAPYPc15bca403XzP6%2BF1V4%2BCbz0iA_NvQ1ebiwJ01jSaUXTLYA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CAPYPc15bca403XzP6%2BF1V4%2BCbz0iA_NvQ1ebiwJ01jSaUXTLYA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo9fiJhL3SKLpd917LAXUB35N%3DSB9Oqf9qvp2MYRRv1Cg%40mail.gmail.com.
