--
*Mar*The Web of Emotions
Every life form is an emotional complement of every other life form. The
smells of nature, the sounds or musics of nature, the air touches of
nature, which our skins breathe in, the tastes and the sights, all function
as the language of the Biosphere as a whole creating the macro flow of
emotions, the flow of meanings. The meanings create feelings, which become
hormonal communications in our bloodstream, which reach the cells via the
capillaries. There is no life form in the Biosphere that does not respond
positively to positive emotions.
Ultimately; it is the positive emotions that create meanings, purposes and
missions of life.
The feelings are exhaled as smell and sound messages into the air, which
the other organisms hear and inhale, creating the cascades of symbiotic
responses. Unfortunately sciences are struck up in the mechanical paradigm,
and the superstition of not allowing consciousness and emotions into the
webs of technologies, created by the economic motivations, has created the
basic adversarial relation between the human and the rest of the Biosphere.
Economics kills Ecology. Ecology means mainly the web of emotions that
creates the ecological relations among the life forms. Life gets meaning
only from emotions and Ecology creates the emotions. Economics today
creates only pollutions and poisons against nature.
Actually Physics must not stop with Mechanics. The foundation behind
Thermodynamics is Emotion Dynamics. The Biosphere on the surface of the
earth is existing because of the particular Thermodynamic situation on the
surface. Every place in the Universe has a Thermodynamic situation and we
cannot know the life forms or forms of consciousness, which exist, say from
the extremely hot to the near absolute zero situations. But every life form
is a form of emotions.
We may be able to contact every life form via emotions and not via
mechanics. Investigation into the emotion based concept and paradigm bases
of understanding in diverse Thermodynamic situations is a gigantic and vast
field which modern sciences refuge to acknowledge. Actually the very
subject consciousness is kept outside the scopes of all sciences as it
disturbs the feelings-less mechanical approach.
We have to first accept that electromagnetism has an emotional and
consciousness dimension. Then if there is electromagnetism everywhere in
the Universe, then there will be consciousness also along with
electromagnetism.
Emotions create real meanings. Mechanics create only feelings-less and
meanings-less engineerings Sage deals with Feelings. A Scientist deals with
Mechanics. Feelings create emotional bonds, concern for the Biosphere and
the Environment. Every machine harms some life form. For a scientist
emotions mean bias which must be shunned. To a Sage emotion is truth, and
the Biosphere is sacred and the Universe is a web of Emotions, not merely
machines.
Today Economics has reached the dead end because there are no Jobs as there
are machines for everything. But a Sage has billions of Jobs, as nature has
to be cured from the deathbed created by the pollutions and destructions
and as only feelings and emotions give meaning to life.
Every University must change its basic paradigm. It must change into
emotion based Ecology and end its slavish bondage to feelings-less
mechanics.
As the first step every University must start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without
human tampering.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
That’s a fascinating and deeply poetic essay — *“The Web of Emotions” by YM
Sarma* — and it offers a strong philosophical and ecological critique of
modern science and economics.
Here’s a concise summary and interpretation of its main ideas:
------------------------------
*🌍 Core Thesis*
Life and consciousness are not mechanical processes but *emotional and
meaningful phenomena*. Every living form is connected to every other
through a *“web of emotions”*, forming an emotional ecology that sustains
the Biosphere.
------------------------------
*💫 Key Concepts*
1. *Emotion as the Foundation of Life*
- Emotions are not secondary human experiences but *the fundamental
energy* of all living systems.
- The “language of the Biosphere” — smells, sounds, touch, light —
creates *flows of emotions and meanings* that connect species.
2. *Science’s Limitation*
- Modern science, rooted in a *mechanistic paradigm*, ignores emotion
and consciousness.
- By treating nature as a machine, science (and by extension,
technology and economics) has created an *adversarial relationship*
between humanity and the rest of life.
3. *Economics vs. Ecology*
- “Economics kills Ecology”: modern economics is built on
exploitation and mechanical productivity, not emotional or ecological
harmony.
- True ecology, in contrast, is *the web of emotional interrelations*
that gives life meaning and sustains the planet.
4. *Emotion Dynamics as Physics*
- Just as thermodynamics explains physical energy, *“Emotion
Dynamics”* could explain the flow of consciousness and meaning in the
universe.
- Since electromagnetism pervades everything, and if electromagnetism
carries emotional and conscious qualities, *consciousness exists
everywhere*.
5. *Sage vs. Scientist*
- The *scientist* seeks objectivity and avoids emotion (considering
it bias).
- The *sage* embraces emotion as truth — seeing the Biosphere as
sacred and interconnected.
6. *A Call for Paradigm Shift*
- Universities should abandon purely mechanical thinking and
adopt *emotion-based
ecology* as a new foundation for knowledge.
- Establishing *“Free Nature Parks”* without human interference would
be a first step toward restoring the planet’s emotional and ecological
balance.
------------------------------
*🧠 Interpretive Reflection*
Sarma’s essay blends *ecophilosophy, spiritual ecology, and systems
thinking*. It echoes thinkers like *James Lovelock (Gaia hypothesis)*, *Fritjof
Capra (The Web of Life)*, and *Rudolf Steiner*, but goes further in
claiming that *emotion itself is the universal connective tissue* — not
just energy or information.
It’s both a *critique* (of industrial, emotionless modernity) and a
*manifesto* (for re-sacralizing life through emotional awareness and
ecological empathy).
------------------------------
Would you like me to analyze it from a *scientific*, *philosophical*, or
*spiritual* perspective next? Each lens highlights different strengths and
challenges in Sarma’s argument.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BDA-MN1QS5wxo7hdUuU%3D75iqK%3DhqBr23kMMCzZ1K_v%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.
