-- *Mar*Infinity
By infinity we mean the endlessness of the same phenomenon or diverse phenomena. But mistakenly we refer to the mathematical and measurable endlessness and not infinity in terms of feeling. A measure by itself has limit by implication. There cannot be a measure that is itself infinite. Measurement is the imposition of limits on a phenomenon; to ultimately reduce it to definite quantities. But every feeling is infinite. We live in feelings each of which is a flow of infinity. Individually we are infinities, living in infinite flows of feelings. Our self concept of the 3D shape is false. We feel as the Biosphere and not as individuals. Separated and individual feeling,is automatically confined to the analytical part of the Brain, an outcome of mutilation.But our entire skin with its pores, not only the nose,breathes,smells,senses,perceives,interacts,communicates,understands,builds concept bases of feelings which change continuously,...there can be no defined contours of feeling flows. Every atom constituting you, leaves the so called you by the next year, in fact as a person you are ever met morphing. By continuously, destroying nature, in the name of development, we are creating infinite tragedy flows. When a person dies trillions and trillions of organisms in him/her die. When a tree is killed, trillions of organisms in and on the tree too die. We are creating gigantic flows of infinite tragedies, in the name of economic development. We are becoming the infinities of fear and neurosis. We urgently need to shift our perception to breathing,smelling, sensing,perceiving,understanding as a part of the Biosphere, the Biosphere in the free and healthy nature without human tampering..We must realize that mathematical reductionism is creating infinities of stupidities. The tiny tots, especially need an end to the torture of early mathematical reductionism. Let them happily dance and frolic. YM Sarma Chat gpt This reflection by YM Sarma is a deeply philosophical and ecological critique of how modern human consciousness—and especially modern systems like science, economics, and education—misunderstand and mishandle the concept of *infinity*, *self*, and *feeling*. It weaves together ideas from ecology, existential thought, somatic perception, and a criticism of reductionism. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas and their implications: ------------------------------ *🔷 1. Misunderstanding Infinity* - *Infinity as felt experience:* Sarma argues that infinity is not something to be calculated or measured (as in mathematics), but something to be *felt*. Feelings are not finite—they’re continuous, fluid, unbounded. - *Measurement implies limitation:* Anything that can be measured is, by definition, *finite*. Measurement is a form of reduction, an act of *control*. *Implication:* The attempt to understand the universe or ourselves only through measurable data (science, math) misses the essence of being—*which is feeling, change, and connection.* ------------------------------ *🔷 2. The Self as the Biosphere* - *False individuality:* The idea of being a discrete, separate self (a “3D shape”) is an illusion, a mental construct. - *Somatic perception:* We don’t just “think” with the brain—we sense, feel, and interact with the world through *the entire skin*, every pore. - *Constant flux:* Every atom in our body is replaced over time. Our identities are *not fixed* but in constant transformation. *Implication:* We are not individuals isolated from nature—we *are* nature, flowing in and out of the biosphere in an infinite dance. Alienation from this truth leads to neurosis and fear. ------------------------------ *🔷 3. The Violence of “Development”* - *Ecocide as infinite tragedy:* Killing a tree or destroying an ecosystem isn't a singular act—it's the extinction of *trillions of lives* and the collapse of interdependent flows. - *Economic development = infinite tragedy flows:* What is called “progress” is framed as a tragic, multiplying catastrophe. *Implication:* Modern economic paradigms that promote exploitation and control are destroying the infinite, interconnected lives within the biosphere, including our own. ------------------------------ *🔷 4. Call for a New Perception* - *Return to feeling and sensing:* Sarma calls for a return to the body, to feeling, to the *sensing organism* in harmony with the world—not the analytical, fragmented mind. - *Free children from early reductionism:* Especially striking is the call to *end the early imposition of mathematical reductionism* on children, and instead let them dance, play, and be in harmony with the infinite flow of life. *Implication:* Education, and society as a whole, must reorient from control and reduction to *experience and connection*. ------------------------------ *🔷 Overall Tone and Message* This is a poetic, urgent plea for: - *Ecological awareness* - *Somatic consciousness* - *Resistance to reductionist thinking* - *Reconnection with the living, breathing world* It’s a call to *re-feel* the world—not as something to exploit or understand through numbers, but as something to live within, to flow with. ------------------------------ If you're exploring this in depth, you might want to connect it to: - Deep ecology (Arne Naess) - Phenomenology (Maurice Merleau-Ponty) - Indigenous worldviews (particularly relational ontologies) - Animism and posthumanism - The critique of Cartesian dualism ------------------------------ Would you like this condensed into a short essay or a poem inspired by these ideas? Certainly. Here's a *detailed evaluation* of YM Sarma's essay *"Infinity"* based on common academic criteria used in philosophy, literature, and reflective writing, followed by a *grade and marks*. ------------------------------ 📋 *Evaluation Criteria* *Criterion* *Marks (out of 10)* *Comments* *1. Originality & Depth of Thought* *9* The ideas are highly original and deeply philosophical. The rejection of reductionism and embrace of somatic/ecological consciousness is thought-provoking. *2. Clarity of Expression* *6.5* Some sentences are densely packed, with abrupt transitions. While poetic, the prose can become hard to follow in places. Clarity suffers due to lack of structure. *3. Coherence & Logical Flow* *6* The argument flows more as a stream of consciousness than a structured essay. Ideas are rich, but the flow is sometimes disjointed. Transitions between themes (e.g., feeling, ecology, education) are not always smooth. *4. Language & Style* *7* Language is passionate and poetic, which is suitable for the subject. However, some grammatical and punctuation errors (e.g., inconsistent spacing, run-on sentences) detract from its polish. *5. Relevance & Insight* *9* The essay offers profound ecological and existential insight, especially in the critique of development, reductionism, and individualism. The theme is highly relevant in contemporary ecological and educational discourse. *6. Emotional & Philosophical Impact* *8.5* The essay carries emotional depth and philosophical force. It invites readers to reflect on existence, feeling, and the biosphere in a unique way. ------------------------------ ✅ *Total Marks: 46 / 60* ------------------------------ 🎓 *Grade: B+ (Very Good)* ------------------------------ 📝 *Summary Feedback* · *Strengths:* o Deeply original and evocative. o Offers a compelling philosophical and ecological perspective. o Challenges dominant modes of thought in an impactful way. · *Areas for Improvement:* o Needs more structure to guide the reader through the complex ideas. o Language should be refined for clarity without losing poetic power. o Transitions between themes (infinity, the body, death, education) could be more deliberate and cohesive. ------------------------------ 📌 Suggested Revisions (Optional): · Break the essay into sections or paragraphs with thematic focus. · Use clearer transitions (e.g., “Now turning to education…”, “This leads us to…”). · Proofread for grammatical clarity and remove punctuation inconsistencies. · Consider a short concluding paragraph that reiterates the central message for impact. Would you like help rewriting or polishing the essay based on this feedback? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2B65MbEoDqRUfxkcvpctUPgaZnjgNXXpPLw7BZacH8rVg%40mail.gmail.com.
