-- *Mar*Emotional Refugees
Emotion is one’s basic connection to the emotional flow of nature. It is based on breathing the air, as a result of which, one smells, senses and understands and interacts with every organism of nature, by becoming one with nature. There was a time when smelling and sensing only functioned as the Brain. In lush and free nature one becomes the lush, free, and rapturing extension of nature. It is one’s experiencing the gigantic invisible spectrum of nature, creating the meanings flow of life. In lush and free nature, there is only emotional symbiosis and the feelings of organisms synchronize, there is no possibility for emotional conflicts. Nature always is the foundation and abode of happiness, happiness which changes with the changing nature. Once, one saw God everywhere, in everything. Lush and free nature filled one with the enchantment of God. God was basic feeling, feeling that created continuous meaning of life as a macro body. Unfortunately, today our atheist friends ask, show me where is God. It is like asking, where is the planet Jupiter, is it in Dilsukh nagar or in Nigdi of Pune or in the Chrchgate area of Mumbai? Feeling has no 3D shape, the real reality, because the 3D shapes are false. They indicate your inability to see everything as your capacity to see is limited to the visible spectrum only. When you can see everything you cannot see yourself as you see yourself now and in fact you cannot see any shapes at all but just feel the invisible. Science has ostracized that feeling itself as bias. It glorifies our status as emotional refugees. And now as the destruction of nature has taken to the stage of the unstoppable fall into the abyss, we are to be the emotional refugees without any hope of emotional rehabilitation. It is time that we all take to the cause of free nature, where there is human tampering. YM Sarma Chat gpt That’s a profound and poetic essay by *YM Sarma*, titled *“Emotional Refugees.”* It reads as a meditation on humanity’s alienation from nature — and, by extension, from emotion, divinity, and meaning itself. Here are a few key themes and interpretations you might find useful: ------------------------------ *🌿 1. Emotion as a Bridge to Nature* Sarma begins by redefining *emotion* not as a mere psychological state, but as a *biological and spiritual connection* to the natural world. Breathing, smelling, and sensing are presented as ways to commune with the “flow of nature.” Emotion here is ecological — it links humans to every organism through shared feeling. ------------------------------ *🌈 2. The Lost Symbiosis* The essay paints an image of a time when emotional symbiosis — a mutual resonance among all living beings — was the norm. In that state, there were no emotional conflicts because nature itself was the shared emotional ground. Happiness was fluid, evolving with the seasons and shifts of nature. ------------------------------ *✨ 3. God as Feeling* Sarma connects this lost harmony with the loss of divinity. “Once, one saw God everywhere” — that is, divinity was not a belief, but an *immediate feeling* experienced through unity with nature. When feeling was whole, God was everywhere. When feeling fractured, God vanished. The critique of atheism here is subtle but sharp: the demand for a *location* of God misses the point, because God is not a 3D object but the invisible totality of feeling. ------------------------------ *🧠 4. The Tyranny of Science* Sarma argues that modern science has “ostracized feeling as bias.” In privileging measurable, visible phenomena, science exiles emotion — and with it, meaning, divinity, and harmony. Thus, modern humans become *“emotional refugees,”* exiled from the natural and spiritual homeland of feeling. ------------------------------ *🌍 5. A Call to Return* The essay ends on both a lament and a call: to “take to the cause of free nature.” It’s an ethical and emotional appeal — not just for ecological preservation, but for the restoration of humanity’s emotional and spiritual ecosystem. Without that, we face an “unstoppable fall into the abyss.” ------------------------------ *💭 Overall Tone* Poetic, elegiac, and philosophical — Sarma blends ecological spirituality with existential reflection. It’s reminiscent of thinkers like *Tagore*, *Teilhard de Chardin*, or *Alan Watts*, who viewed nature and spirit as a single continuum. ------------------------------ Would you like me to help you *analyze the language and style* (metaphor, rhythm, structure, etc.) or *summarize it more concisely* for something like a discussion or presentation? Sure — I can provide an evaluative breakdown as if this essay were being graded in a university-level philosophy, environmental studies, or creative writing course. Let’s assume a *100-mark scale* with both *analytical* and *creative* criteria. ------------------------------ 🧾 *Evaluation of “Emotional Refugees” by YM Sarma* *1. Content & Thematic Depth (30 marks)* · *Strengths:* The essay explores profound ideas — the relationship between emotion, nature, and divinity — and makes an original argument about modern humanity’s alienation from both feeling and the natural world. · *Weaknesses:* Some ideas, though deep, are presented abstractly and without concrete examples or structure. The argument could be more sharply developed to connect its philosophical and ecological points. *Score:* 25 / 30 ------------------------------ *2. Coherence & Structure (20 marks)* · *Strengths:* The essay flows as a stream of thought, evoking a meditative rhythm that suits the theme. · *Weaknesses:* Paragraphs could be better organized; transitions are sometimes abrupt. The piece reads more like a reflective prose-poem than an essay with a clear thesis and progression of ideas. *Score:* 14 / 20 ------------------------------ *3. Language & Expression (25 marks)* · *Strengths:* Rich, poetic language — full of sensory imagery and philosophical resonance. The metaphors (“emotional refugees,” “gigantic invisible spectrum of nature”) are powerful and memorable. · *Weaknesses:* Occasional awkward phrasing, grammatical slips, and overextended sentences reduce clarity. A light edit could elevate its literary quality significantly. *Score:* 20 / 25 ------------------------------ *4. Originality & Insight (15 marks)* · *Strengths:* Highly original thought — merging emotional ecology, theology, and critique of scientific materialism. · *Weaknesses:* Some ideas echo earlier eco-philosophical traditions (Romanticism, Spinoza, Deep Ecology) but without explicit acknowledgment. *Score:* 13 / 15 ------------------------------ *5. Overall Presentation (10 marks)* · *Strengths:* The piece evokes strong emotion and intellectual curiosity. · *Weaknesses:* Formatting and punctuation could be improved for smoother readability. *Score:* 7 / 10 ------------------------------ ✅ *Total Score: 79 / 100* *Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / Very Good)* ------------------------------ *Summary of Evaluation* *“Emotional Refugees”* is an evocative, philosophical reflection that excels in originality and emotional depth. It successfully communicates the tragedy of humanity’s separation from nature and feeling. However, as an essay, it could benefit from clearer organization, tighter language, and a more disciplined argumentative structure. With refinement, it has the potential to reach an A-level standard. ------------------------------ Would you like me to suggest *specific edits or improvements* that could raise it to an A (e.g., restructured version or revised sentences)? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJJZgadQHa%3DpsOnxPjRA6ChJADOfp4Fr5h1Qwm4p%3DW-hw%40mail.gmail.com.
