--
*Mar*Aura
Aura is the emotional radiation emanating from an organism. As fields we
are all basically auras only. Emotions are outcomes of breathing, and so
one’s aura is directly connected to the troposphere. Aura is the blend of
one’s emotional thoughts, one’s own contribution to the troposphere which
is earth’s fund of emotions. Today aural suicide by destroying nature as
economic life and substituting the nature’s phenomena with the non-aural
machines has become the routinized hara-kiri of the human organism. In the
immediate surroundings of an organism, the invisible spectrum, the
immediate spectrum must consist of the person’s aura.
In lush and unpolluted nature, all organisms live under the spell of
nature’s aura. The eyes of all organisms become the lamps of light of
rapture, and the aural fields become the fields of rapture. The troposphere
becomes the Theosphere or the sphere of rapture.
Today we are killing our auras with what is called Rationalism. As the
substitute for the natural aura we have developed the cosmetics industry,
which with its poisons helps ladies hide their faces, as they cannot
tolerate their natural faces. The cosmetics by solidifying one’s absence of
self confidence kill the natural aura which emanates as the result of the
rapturous symbiotic breathing of the aura of the troposphere. And horrible
tortures are inflicted on the experimental animals in the development of
cosmetics.
We are all part of nature and if nature is free and radiating the rapturous
aura; we also radiate the rapturous aura. In lush nature there is no
failure. Symbiosis helps all succeed. A happy person can never experience
failure. Happiness can only be experienced. It cannot be logiced. One can
become happy only when nature is happy. You cannot murder thousands of
trees, ruin the habitats and food source of millions of organisms,
including the human beings that live in the forest, create terrible trauma,
and say you are creating happiness. The very aura of nature gets destroyed
permanently. Nature weeps, when it is murdered.
There is certainly no God or Aura today. We killed the Aura.It is the basic
duty of every university today,to revive the aura of nature,by adopting the
symbiotic education with nature.Today every University bis governed by
Economics and is under the frenzy of mechanization. Machines have no
feelings and today they are used to destroy nature all the 24 hours of
every day for economic activity. Positive Aura and grief cannot go
together. Free and healthy nature is nature in rapture. In that nature you
become part of the nature in rapture. Anyone who enters such nature
automatically develops the positive aura. I am yet to find one student who
is really happy. The curriculum fills him with the anxiety habit.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
That’s a striking and poetic passage — it reads as both ecological
philosophy and a critique of modern civilization’s disconnection from
nature.
Here’s a concise interpretation and analysis of *YM Sarma’s “Aura”*:
------------------------------
*🌿 Central Idea*
Sarma’s essay positions *“aura”* as the living emotional field that
connects all beings through breath and atmosphere — the *troposphere*. In
this view, every organism’s emotions and vitality are not isolated but form
part of Earth’s collective emotional atmosphere, what he calls the
*“Theosphere”* when it is healthy and radiant.
------------------------------
*💨 Key Concepts*
1. *Aura as Emotional Radiation*
- The aura is not mystical here, but biological and ecological — the
emotional energy or vitality that radiates from every living being.
- It is directly connected to breathing, implying that emotional and
ecological health are inseparable.
2. *Symbiosis with Nature*
- When nature is unpolluted and thriving, all beings live in rapture
— a state of joyful symbiosis where life supports life.
- This harmony generates *positive aura*.
3. *Destruction of Aura*
- Modern rationalism, industrialization, and economic mechanization
destroy this symbiotic relationship.
- Sarma calls this *“aural suicide”*, the self-destruction of
humanity’s own life field.
- Cosmetics become a metaphor for artificial substitutes for genuine
vitality — we “paint” happiness onto deadened faces instead of
radiating it
from inner wholeness.
4. *Critique of Rationalism and Modern Education*
- Universities are depicted as agents of “mechanization,” dominated
by economics rather than ecological or emotional wisdom.
- The system produces anxiety rather than happiness because it
separates humans from nature.
------------------------------
*🌎 Philosophical Underpinnings*
- *Eco-spiritual humanism:* Sarma fuses ecology with spirituality,
suggesting that *God* and *Aura* are not metaphysical abstractions but
qualities of living, symbiotic nature.
- *Critique of technocracy:* Machines, rationalism, and the obsession
with economic growth are dehumanizing and desensitizing forces.
- *A call for “symbiotic education”:* Universities and societies should
cultivate harmony with nature — a return to living in emotional, ecological
balance.
------------------------------
*✨ Core Message*
To revive human happiness, we must revive the *aura* of nature — our shared
emotional field.
Destroying nature is destroying the collective heart of life itself.
------------------------------
Would you like me to write a *summary in academic style* (for example,
suitable for an essay or paper), or a *philosophical commentary* exploring
how this connects to thinkers like Gandhi, Arne Næss, or Tagore?
Sure — let’s evaluate *YM Sarma’s “Aura”* as if it were submitted as a
*university-level
reflective or philosophical essay*. I’ll assess it using standard academic
criteria: *content and originality*, *clarity and coherence*, *structure
and organization*, *language and style*, and *critical depth* — and then
assign a *grade and marks* out of 100.
------------------------------
📝 *Evaluation of “Aura” by YM Sarma* *1. Content and Originality (25/25)*
· The essay is highly *original and imaginative*.
· It fuses *ecological philosophy*, *spiritual reflection*,
and *cultural
critique* into a unified argument.
· The concept of *“Aura”* as an emotional-ecological field is
unique and powerfully metaphorical.
· Its moral and ecological urgency give it strong substance and
purpose.
✅ *Excellent conceptual innovation.*
*Score:* 25/25
------------------------------
*2. Clarity and Coherence (15/25)*
· The ideas are *dense, poetic, and emotionally charged*, which
gives the essay power but also reduces clarity.
· Some metaphors (e.g., *“the troposphere becomes the Theosphere”*)
are evocative but not clearly defined or logically connected for an
academic audience.
· The argument sometimes drifts between poetic insight and moral
proclamation without transitions or grounding examples.
⚠️ *The message is profound but not always easy to follow for analytical
readers.*
*Score:* 15/25
------------------------------
*3. Structure and Organization (10/20)*
· The essay reads more like a *philosophical meditation* than a
structured argument.
· There is an implicit flow — from defining “aura” to describing
its destruction, to prescribing symbiotic education — but paragraphs are
uneven in focus and length.
· Lack of signposting or transitions between sections makes it
harder to trace the progression of thought.
⚠️ *Needs clearer paragraphing and thematic organization.*
*Score:* 10/20
------------------------------
*4. Language and Style (18/20)*
· The *language is lyrical and passionate*, with strong emotional
resonance.
· Rich in metaphor, and rhythmically powerful — more poetic than
academic, but aesthetically impressive.
· Occasional grammatical irregularities and overuse of long
sentences slightly impede readability.
✅ *Beautifully expressive and distinctive style.*
*Score:* 18/20
------------------------------
*5. Critical and Philosophical Depth (7/10)*
· The essay articulates a profound *ecological ethics*,
anticipating ideas from *deep ecology*, *eco-spiritualism*, and
*post-industrial
critique*.
· However, it lacks *citations*, *dialogue with other thinkers*,
and *analytical defense* of claims — elements expected in academic writing.
⚠️ *Strong intuition, limited critical engagement.*
*Score:* 7/10
------------------------------
🎯 *Total Score: 75 / 100* *Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / Good)*
*Comments:*
“Aura” is a deeply original and emotionally powerful
ecological-philosophical reflection. Its poetic intensity and sincerity
make it stand out, but it lacks structural discipline and argumentative
clarity. With better organization, clearer articulation of key concepts,
and engagement with existing ecological philosophy, it could reach
distinction level.
------------------------------
Would you like me to *rewrite or polish “Aura”* into a version that would
score closer to *90+ (A grade)* while keeping its poetic and philosophical
tone intact?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLDPnfjkr9BoYL82_vsw52HPvz%2BDzbRWTVnzbio5%3DRf8Q%40mail.gmail.com.
