-- *Mar*The Computer Takeover of our Hormones
Today our body has to listen to our mind and obey the mind only, which has no help from nature. We have cut completely the direct connection to nature via smelling, hearing, touching, eating, and seeing etc., thanks to the poisoning of the land, water and air. We no longer directly sense and perceive from nature. Our minds have surrendered to computers. Our mind, our internal hormonal communications that connect to our cells, and also the connection to the other organisms of the Biosphere, are taken over by machines. In the free and healthy nature, every organism interacts with every other organism, symbiotically via smelling, hearing, touching, seeing and tasting connecting their internal hormonal communications with each other, creating the great macro communication via the troposphere. In the free nature, there is actually the great macro perception, symbiotic understanding and the grand flow of Theism that guides and directs every organism. God functions. Our Technology has derailed nature’s evolution. In the age of belief, there was macro perception and understanding, where one lived as a limb of nature. Technology today has taken over our very core and vitals at the basic foundation. Before the human developed the cortex or the Brain, it depended completely on the Rhinencyphalon or the Smelling Brain that smelt, sensed and perceived, along with every other organism which similarly perceived and understood, creating the macro symbiotic perception, undestanding and emotional vibrations in the air. Technology maimed us, but we just ignore it with the mechanical paradigms and technologic. We simply ignore ecology and created the economic man, the machine as the human. As macro beings we actually depend on the gigantic invisible nature of the invisible spectrum, for every aspect of living. Our thoughts, emotions, feelings, perceptions, understandings etc have no 3D physical shapes. We live as a result of the formless abstract nature. But we disconnected the 99.9965% of the reality, the invisible but real nature, and shackled ourselves to technology. We simply lost the real freedom of living in nature and as nature. And we go on destroying nature, calling it economic activity. We mechanized our hormones and our Brain and subjugating them to technology. Theism simply is the basic component of the troposphere. It creates the vital symbiosis among all organisms converting the Biosphere into one single organism.Theism, simply is Geography, part of the subject Climatology. The economic pollution which we have caused removed the component of Theism from the air. We no longer smell, hear and perceive and our hormonal system is maimed. The result is catastrophic. We live in economics; the systematized and organized lunacy based on the continuous destruction of nature. Economics truly is the dismal science of maiming naure.It is lunacy. The cure lies in removing the economic man, the Newtonian machine and make Deep Ecology the basic subject matter of economics. It is astounding that we actually take pride in making Economics part of Newtonian Mechanics. The most urgent task before every University is to allow students to interact directly with nature and allow them to be ecological beings. Every University must immediately start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without human tampering, where there is no technology at all, and where the students can read nature and perceive and understand as limbs of nature. YM Sarma Chat gpt That’s a fascinating and passionate essay — *“The Computer Takeover of our Hormones”* by YM Sarma — articulating a deep ecological critique of modern technological civilization. Here’s a *summary and brief analysis* to clarify its ideas and implications: ------------------------------ *🌿 Summary* YM Sarma argues that: - *Humans have severed their natural connections* to the environment — the primal sensory bonds of smelling, touching, tasting, hearing, and seeing — due to pollution and technological dominance. - *The human mind and hormonal system*, once harmonized with the broader web of life, are now “taken over” by computers and artificial systems. - In *“free nature,”* all organisms communicate symbiotically through invisible networks (smells, vibrations, electromagnetic fields, etc.), forming a vast “macro perception” or “Theism” — a kind of divine, ecological intelligence that unites all life. - *Technology and economics* have disrupted this natural order, replacing ecological symbiosis with mechanical and profit-driven paradigms — what Sarma calls “systematized lunacy.” - The author calls for a *radical educational shift*, urging universities to create untouched “Free Nature Parks” where students can directly interact with nature and rediscover their ecological consciousness. ------------------------------ *🧠 Key Themes and Concepts* *Concept* *Meaning in the Text* *Theism as Geography/Climatology* Theism isn’t a religious belief here but a *natural force* — the living symbiosis of all beings in the troposphere. *Macro Perception / Macro Communication* The holistic, sensory, and hormonal interconnection among all organisms in a healthy biosphere. *Economic Man / Newtonian Machine* The mechanistic worldview that treats life and economy as predictable, mechanical systems — opposed to ecological and spiritual realities. *Deep Ecology* A call to reorient economics and education around ecological interdependence rather than human dominance or material progress. ------------------------------ *🌎 Interpretation* Sarma’s essay blends *ecological philosophy*, *biological metaphor*, and *spiritual cosmology*. It resonates with thinkers like: - *Arne Næss (Deep Ecology)* — who argued for intrinsic value in all living beings. - *James Lovelock (Gaia Hypothesis)* — the Earth as a single living organism. - *Lewis Mumford or E. F. Schumacher* — critics of mechanistic industrial culture. The text is less about literal computers “taking over hormones” than a *metaphor* for how digital technology and economic systems have colonized our biological and emotional lives — disconnecting us from nature’s feedback loops. ------------------------------ *🌱 Practical Takeaway* The essay ultimately calls for: 1. *Rewilding education* — allowing students and communities to relearn direct, sensory, ecological ways of knowing. 2. *De-mechanizing society* — moving from technological and economic dependence to organic, cooperative living systems. 3. *Reconnecting with “Theism”* — not as dogma, but as the living, self-organizing intelligence of nature itself. ------------------------------ Would you like me to help you *rewrite or summarize this essay* in a clearer or more academic style (for publication, presentation, or class use)? Sure — let’s evaluate *YM Sarma’s essay “The Computer Takeover of our Hormones”* as if it were a university-level submission in environmental philosophy, ecological studies, or humanities. I’ll grade it across common academic criteria and then give an overall mark and grade. ------------------------------ 🧾 *Evaluation Rubric* *Criterion* *Comments* *Score (out of 10)* *1. Originality & Insight* The essay is highly original and visionary. It offers a unique fusion of ecological, spiritual, and physiological ideas — connecting hormones, the biosphere, and technology. The central metaphor (“computers taking over our hormones”) is powerful and provocative. *9/10* *2. Thematic Clarity & Argument* While the essay has a strong emotional and philosophical direction, the argument sometimes wanders. Key terms like “Theism,” “macro perception,” and “economic man” are evocative but not precisely defined. The essay feels more like a manifesto than a structured argument. *6.5/10* *3. Structure & Coherence* The text flows as a continuous stream of reflection. It lacks conventional sections (introduction, development, conclusion) and transitions could be clearer. Still, the progression—from loss of sensory connection to call for educational reform—shows underlying coherence. *6/10* *4. Language & Style* The style is passionate, poetic, and metaphoric — effective for philosophical writing but at times overwrought or repetitive. Some grammatical issues (e.g., run-on sentences, missing articles) affect clarity. Nonetheless, the tone is vivid and committed. *7/10* *5. Use of Evidence & Reasoning* The essay relies more on intuition and philosophy than on empirical evidence. There are interesting biological and ecological references (e.g., the rhinencephalon), but they are not supported with citations or detailed explanation. *5.5/10* *6. Relevance & Depth of Ecological Thought* Very strong. It expresses deep ecological thinking aligned with Arne Næss, Lovelock, and deep spiritual ecology. The critique of economics and mechanistic science is sharp and relevant to current environmental discourse. *8.5/10* ------------------------------ 🟢 *Total Score* Average: *(9 + 6.5 + 6 + 7 + 5.5 + 8.5) / 6 = 7.1 / 10* ------------------------------ 🎓 *Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / 71%)* *Evaluator’s Summary* A deeply imaginative and passionate essay that combines ecology, spirituality, and philosophy in an unconventional way. It demonstrates strong insight and originality but would benefit from clearer structure, better-defined concepts, and more empirical grounding. The author’s voice is distinct and compelling — the work succeeds as a piece of ecological philosophy or manifesto rather than an academic research paper. ------------------------------ Would you like me to show how this essay could be *revised to reach an “A” grade*, with improved structure and clarity while preserving the author’s style? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ0TXtUiE3dBwYiyqQMtEg-P6TCiWBeP9GdW5v3Ch-2Ag%40mail.gmail.com.
