COGNITION DEFINED BY WEST AND INDIA


         “Telepathy is the transport of feelings and not in the language of
words. But when you feel the meanings of words as meanings evolve in you on
the basis of your experience and perception in life, telepathy takes to the
language of words particular to you. No two persons really understand a
word in the same way. When you become a part, sprout and limb of nature,
the troposphere takes over your hormonal communication and learning becomes
symbiotic and hormonal.”  One of the members wrote these words today. Of
course, another member wrote he is deleting good things but adding only a
waste product. NO TWO MEMBERS THINK ALIKE. WHERE THERE IS A KRISHNA THERE
MUST BE A ARJUNA NAD KARNA TOO. West also think similarly on telepathy and
cognition unlike in India. Where there are several opinions, or differed
understanding, can there be a symbiosis?

         The difference between Western and Indian philosophy in their
approach to cognition and telepathy is rooted in their epistemological
frameworks, ontologies, and worldviews. Below is a comparative analysis
based on classical sources and scholarly interpretations.



COGNITION: Western vs Indian Philosophy

1. Western Philosophy: Cognition

a. Nature of Cognition

Empirical and Rational Traditions dominate.

Empiricists (e.g., Locke, Hume): All knowledge comes from sense experience.

Rationalists (e.g., Descartes, Kant): Reason and innate ideas are also
sources of knowledge.

b. Cognition as Representation

Mind is viewed as representational — forming internal representations of
external stimuli.

B Cognitive science and philosophy of mind often model cognition through
information processing, neuroscience, and computational theories (e.g.,
Fodor, Dennett).

c. Epistemological Framework

Reliance on subject-object *dualism*: A knowing subject perceives an
external object.

Emphasis on justification and reliability of belief (e.g., Gettier problem,
reliabilism).

UNDERSTOOD FROM

Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

2. Indian Philosophy: Cognition (Prajñā / Jñāna)

a. Nature of Cognition

Seen as direct or mediated awareness — includes perception (pratyakṣa),
inference (anumāna), verbal testimony (śabda), comparison (upamāna), etc.
More inclusive: Not limited to sensory data — includes inner perception
(manas), self-awareness (svasaṃvedana), and yogic insight (yogipratyakṣa).

b. *non-dualistic* vs Dualistic Views

Advaita Vedānta: All cognition ultimately resolves into non-dual
consciousness (Brahman).

Nyāya and Vaiśeṣika: More analytical and dualistic; cognition involves a
self, mind, sense organs, and external object.

c. Self-Cognition (Svasaṃvedana)

Some schools (e.g., Yogācāra Buddhism, Kashmir Shaivism) argue for
self-luminous cognition — consciousness is self-aware.

AS UNDERSTOOD FROM:

Nyāya Sūtra (Gautama), Vedānta Sūtra (Bādarāyaṇa)

Yoga Sūtra (Patañjali)

Brahma Sūtra Bhāṣya (Śaṅkara)

 TELEPATHY: Western vs Indian Views

1. Western Thought on Telepathy

a. Skepticism

Generally treated as pseudoscience.

Scientific materialism does not accept telepathy due to lack of empirical
verification.

b. Parapsychology

19th–20th century saw efforts to study telepathy (e.g., by the Society for
Psychical Research).

Telepathy: Mind-to-mind communication without sensory or physical
interaction.

c. Contemporary Cognitive Science

Current neuroscience does not support telepathy.

Some speculative work in quantum consciousness (e.g., *Roger Penrose*), but
still controversial.

Carl Jung (collective unconscious, synchronicity — not telepathy per se)

2. Indian Philosophical Perspective on Telepathy (Yogic Powers / Siddhis)

a. Accepted Phenomenon in Yoga & Sāṅkhya

Patañjali’s Yoga Sūtras (3rd chapter: Vibhūti Pāda) describe telepathy as a
siddhi (psychic power) attained through concentration (samādhi) and
detachment (vairāgya).   Example: By samyama on the mind of another, one
gains knowledge of their thoughts (Yoga Sūtra 3.19).

Chapter 3 : Vibhooti Pada || 3.19 ||

प्रत्ययस्य परचित्तज्ञानम्

पदच्छेद: प्रत्ययस्य, पर, चित्त-ज्ञानम् ॥

शब्दार्थ / Word Meaning

pratyayasy - notions

para - other

chitta - mind, consciousness

jnanam - knowledge.

सूत्रार्थ / Sutra Meaning

When the Yogi practices Samyama (concentration, meditation, and absorption)
on the mind of another person, he gains knowledge of the thoughts and
feelings within that person’s mind.

b. Mind is Subtle, Consciousness is Universal

Telepathy possible because minds are interconnected via a universal
substratum (consciousness). Yogic discipline allows one to bypass sensory
channels and access other minds directly.

c. Śruti and Smṛti Support

Upaniṣads and Puranas mention mental communication among sages. Yogis with
purified minds are said to transcend space-time limitations.

Yoga Sūtra of Patañjali (esp. 3.16–3.36)

Bhāgavata Purāṇa (11.15.16: discusses yogic powers)

Comparative Summary Table

Aspect             Western Philosophy                       Indian
Philosophy

View of Cognition         Empirical, Rational, Representational


                                         Experiential, Direct,
Consciousness-based

Self-awareness            Often derivative or secondary

                                         Sometimes intrinsic (e.g.,
svasaṃvedana)

Telepathy                   Skeptical, pseudoscience,
parapsychology

                                               Yogic siddhi, mind-to-mind
connection

Framework Subject-object dualism   Can be non-dual (Advaita, Buddhism)

Method

                          Observation, reason, experiment  Meditation,
self-realization, Samadhi

Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali – Trans. by Swami Satchidananda / Patanjali Yoga
Sutras: Translation & Commentary (A.K. Aruna)

Upanishads – (e.g., Chāndogya, Bṛhadāraṇyaka)

Brahma Sutra Bhāṣya by Shankaracharya

Western Sources   Descartes – Meditations on First Philosophy

Kant – Critique of Pure Reason

Radhakrishnan, S. – Indian Philosophy (Vols I & II) Title

Indian Philosophy, Vol. 1 (Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan)

An Analysis of Extra-sensory Perceptions in Indian Philosophy (2024)
research paper

NB:   KR    I might have written already on all these and so presented as
notes.       K RAJARAM IRS 81025

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqN-9kjjajnZP%3DsUbmDtYoXUjXH6fD6yJmhMUP9g7AiNA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to