Exactly uses the phrasing “speed of information about the event of notice
of consciousness which initiates matter in the vacuum,” but I did find some
works that come close in spirit — touching on consciousness, quantum
mechanics, information, vacuum states, or the boundary between mind and
matter. If you like, I can try to do a more exhaustive search (including
academic papers) to see if there’s something very close. Meanwhile, here
are some books and works that might relate:
Related Books & Ideas
Title How it’s related Gaps / Differences
The Physics of Consciousness: The Quantum Mind and the Meaning of Life by
Evan Harris Walker Explores quantum collapse, consciousness, information
exchange in the brain.
Amazon
More focused on brain and neural-level phenomena; doesn’t frame
the “vacuum”/ pre‑matter initiation in the way your description suggests.
Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness by
Roger Penrose Talks about quantum mechanics’ role in consciousness,
non‑algorithmic aspects; considers wavefunction collapse.
Thoughts & Possibilities
The idea of “events of consciousness” initiating matter in vacuum sounds
reminiscent of observer‑effect interpretations in quantum mechanics. Some
interpretations (like the “consciousness causes collapse” views) suggest
that conscious observation plays a role in transitioning a system from
superposition (vacuum fluctuations, etc.) to definite outcomes. But these
are mostly philosophical and not universally accepted, and they don’t tend
to treat the timing ("speed of information") explicitly in the empirical
sense.
In physics, there is a concept of information propagation speed (e.g. speed
of light in vacuum is the ultimate limit for causal information transfer),
and also in quantum information, one finds bounds like quantum speed limits
(how fast quantum states can evolve), entanglement spreading, or how fast
decoherence or collapse might happen. But those are very different from
“consciousness noticing vacuum then matter appears.”
The specific gaps relative to your phrasing “speed of information
about the event of notice of consciousness which initiates matter in the
vacuum”:
Definition of “notice of consciousness”
None of the works formalizes what exactly counts as “notice.” Is it neural
firing? A subjective threshold? An event in consciousness? That’s essential
if you want to define when the process begins.
What is “initiation of matter in the vacuum”
Are you meaning spontaneous collapse from vacuum fluctuations? Virtual
particles becoming “real”? Or matter emerging in vacuum via observation?
Most quantum collapse models assume superposition, decoherence, etc., but
don’t treat the vacuum as “yet‑to‑be matter” in exactly that way.
Temporal dynamics / speed
How quickly does the effect happen once “notice” happens? How fast does
collapse propagate (if it does)? What is the delay, if any? Most collapse
models give collapse rates but not tied to consciousness directly; also
there’s no empirical measurement of “speed of information about
consciousness noticing” in any of them.
Empirical support
Very little empirical data exists that connects consciousness, initiation
of matter, and timing / speed. Mostly theoretical proposals, philosophical
arguments, or small psychological/behavioral experiments (e.g. Lucido’s
subliminal priming studies) that test whether unobserved vs observed
influences matter.
मनोजवं मारुततुल्यवेगं
जितेन्द्रियं बुद्धिमतां वरिष्ठ ।
वातात्मजं वानरयूथमुख्यं
श्रीरामदूतं शरणं प्रपद्ये ।
Mano-Javam Maaruta-Tulya-Vegam
Jite[a-I]ndriyam Buddhi-Mataam Varissttha |
Vaata-Atmajam Vaanara-Yuutha-Mukhyam
Shriiraama-Duutam Sharannam Prapadye |
(I take Refuge in Sri Hanuman)
1: Who is Swift as the Mind and Fast as the Wind,
2: Who is the Master of the Senses, and Honoured for His Excellent
Intelligence, Learning and Wisdom,
3: Who is Son of the Wind God and Chief among the Vanaras (Who were part of
the Devas incarnated in the species of the monkeys to serve Sri Rama during
His Incarnation),
4: To that Messenger of Sri Rama, I take Refuge (by prostrating before him).
According to buddha, there is a smallest unit of time which
is called "Chiththakshana" and no one can even think about it. Our mind has
a life time of 1 Chiththakshana. So Birth,Life Time And Death of our mind
has this 1 smallest unit. So our mind is birthing,living and dying
trillions and trillions times(Can't even think about it) during our life
time. That's why it says the mind is more and more speeder than the light.
Most of the people can't understand this because of the theories they have
learnt. Finally I would like to say there are trillions (Even more) of
earths which people live, in this universe. And the end of the universe is
inside our own body.
However recently science says,” Is the mind faster than light?
No, thoughts are not faster than the speed of light; they are significantly
slower, limited by the speed of nerve impulses in the brain, which can
range from about 1 meter per second to a maximum of 120 m/s. The speed of
light is the fastest speed at which anything can travel in the universe,
and any physical process, including the electrical and chemical signals
that comprise thoughts, cannot exceed this speed.
Thus, expressions of thinking may not be accurate as far as I am
concerned.
K Rajaram IRS 28925
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooFKPW_FrYq%3DdXs1nh8KGLRf75B2AzCNabxPwOnen6LTw%40mail.gmail.com.
