EMPATHY IS A FGRCE OF NATURE
The relationship between empathy and nature can be explored in several
ways.
1Empathy as a Natural Instinct: At its core, empathy is often seen as an
instinctive part of being human (or even animal). It's a deeply ingrained
ability to understand and share the feelings of others, which helps promote
cooperation and survival. For example, many animals exhibit signs of
empathy within their social groups—whether it's a mother comforting her
young or one animal helping another in distress. In this sense, empathy can
be seen as an evolutionary force that fosters connection and collaboration
in nature.
2 Empathy and the Environment: There’s also a growing conversation around
ecological empathy—our ability to understand and feel for the natural world
and the creatures within it. In this context, empathy could be a bridge to
greater environmental awareness and conservation. If we start to feel the
suffering of ecosystems or endangered species as we do for other people, we
might be more inclined to protect the planet and advocate for its health.
3 The Symbiosis of Empathy and Nature: Just like natural ecosystems depend
on the interconnection of all parts (plants, animals, microorganisms),
empathy also thrives in interconnectedness. The more we foster empathy
towards each other, the more we also see the interconnectedness of all
living things. The act of understanding someone else's emotions or
suffering mirrors how we might recognize our shared responsibility in
caring for the Earth.
4 Nature as a Teacher of Empathy: Nature can also nurture empathy by
teaching patience, understanding, and a sense of wonder. Spending time in
natural settings often fosters a sense of connectedness—not just to the
physical world but to all living beings. People who spend time in nature
are often more reflective and attuned to the feelings and needs of others,
which suggests that nature has a way of cultivating empathy.
Yes, empathy can definitely be seen as an abstract concept, and it’s one
that doesn’t have a simple, concrete definition. It's something that we
feel, experience, and express, but it doesn’t always have a clear,
measurable form like physical objects or even emotions that are easier to
pinpoint.
When we think of empathy as an *abstract*, it’s because it’s more about a
*concept*—an idea of connection and understanding between individuals.
Unlike tangible things, it’s a dynamic experience that fluctuates based on
context, relationships, and personal capacities.
1. *Invisibility*: You can’t see or touch empathy, but you can witness
its effects—like in acts of kindness, compassion, or shared vulnerability.
It’s invisible, yet you feel it in moments of connection or conflict
resolution.
2. *Fluidity*: Empathy isn’t fixed; it changes depending on context,
emotions, or even the complexity of the situation. It’s not always easy to
pinpoint when or why it appears—sometimes it flows naturally, sometimes it
requires effort or intention.
3. *Subjectivity*: Everyone experiences empathy in different ways. One
person might deeply connect with another’s pain, while someone else might
only grasp it intellectually. Its depth and form are often based on
individual experiences, cultural backgrounds, and emotional capacities.
4. *Cognitive vs. Emotional*: Empathy is both a cognitive skill
(understanding someone’s perspective) and an emotional one (feeling what
they feel). The fact that it spans both intellect and emotion makes it more
abstract, a blending of two different types of mental processing that leads
to a shared experience. (STANFORD RESEARCH]
Because it’s abstract, empathy can be hard to pin down and define
universally. But its impact, both on a personal level (in relationships,
for example) and a societal level (in terms of social cohesion and even
conflict resolution), is incredibly tangible.
Then can we learn from nature or become empathetic by development?
*1. Learning Empathy from Nature:*
Nature itself can be a profound teacher of empathy, especially if we
approach it with an open, mindful perspective. There are several ways this
happens:
- *Interconnectedness of Life*:
Nature operates in intricate systems where everything is
interconnected—plants, animals, ecosystems. This can inspire a sense of
empathy because it highlights that what happens to one part of the system
affects the whole. Understanding this can lead us to feel compassion not
just for other people, but for animals, plants, and even ecosystems. People
who spend time observing how different elements of nature support each
other (think of symbiotic relationships, food chains, or mutualism) may
develop a deeper empathy for the interdependent nature of life itself.
- *Learning Through Observation*:
In nature, we often witness acts of care, protection, and cooperation.
For example, a mother bird protecting her young, wolves working together to
hunt, or even trees "communicating" through underground networks
(mycorrhizal fungi) to share nutrients. These behaviors can inspire us to
recognize that empathy is not just human—it’s a universal trait across life
forms.
- *The Calm of Nature*:
Spending time in nature often fosters a state of mindfulness and
presence. In such a space, we might become more attuned to our own emotions
and the emotions of others. The stillness and beauty of nature can help us
reflect on the interconnectedness of all living things, which can, in turn,
help us develop a deeper sense of empathy.
*2. Developing Empathy through Human Evolution and Psychological Growth:*
Humans could develop empathy over time, and this process is influenced by
both individual growth and societal advancements:
- *Personal Development*:
From a psychological standpoint, empathy is something that can be
nurtured and grown. For example, through mindfulness practices, emotional
intelligence training, and cultivating emotional awareness, individuals can
become more attuned to the feelings of others. It’s not just something
we're born with; it’s also something we can enhance through practice.
- *Social and Cultural Evolution*:
On a larger scale, human societies have developed norms and values that
encourage empathy and compassion. For example, as our societies evolved, so
did our ideas of justice, fairness, and human rights. This social
development has expanded the circles of empathy—historically, empathy was
often reserved for family or tribe, but today, many advocate for a broader,
global empathy that includes all races, cultures, and even non-human
creatures.
- *Empathy in Education*:
There’s a growing movement in education to teach empathy as a skill,
helping children and adults alike develop the ability to understand and
connect with others. Programs in schools that focus on social and emotional
learning (SEL) aim to enhance empathy, teaching children how to listen,
understand, and respond to others in ways that build positive relationships.
- *Technology’s Role*:
Interestingly, technology also plays a dual role in empathy development.
While it can create distance and make it harder to "read" emotions online,
it can also help us experience empathy in new ways. For example, virtual
reality (VR) has been used to help people “walk in someone else’s shoes,”
whether it’s experiencing the challenges of living in poverty or seeing the
world through the eyes of refugees. This can enhance our emotional
understanding and empathy toward others’ experiences.
*3. The Role of Nature and Development in Empathy: A Symbiotic Relationship*
There's a feedback loop here. Nature can teach empathy, but human
development (emotionally, cognitively, and socially) also enhances our
ability to be more attuned to nature. When we develop empathy for other
living beings, we’re more likely to protect the environment, care for
animals, and preserve ecosystems. Similarly, the more we understand the
importance of environmental sustainability, the more empathy we cultivate
toward the planet and its inhabitants.
In other words, the more we grow emotionally and intellectually, the more
capable we become of empathizing with the natural world. And in turn, a
deeper understanding of nature's interconnectedness can deepen our empathy
for each other and the world around us.
*Can We Become Empathetic by Development?*
Absolutely. Both *emotional development* and *educational efforts* can
nurture and expand our capacity for empathy. By focusing on our own growth
and exposure to diverse perspectives, we can become more empathetic people.
This growth can be both personal (through experiences, challenges, and
reflection) and societal (through cultural norms, education, and global
connections).
Ultimately, I think nature offers both a *model* for empathy and a *space*
where we can develop and refine it. The development of empathy is not
static, a lifelong process that evolves as we grow, experience new things,
and engage more deeply with both people and the planet. (STANFORD ON
EMPATHY)
Hence walking through the life in calmness elevates one to a higher
level, when he can see in all and in everything HIM, and so life becomes
pervaded by equanimity K RAJARAM IRS 10925
On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 19:23, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*Empathy and Instant Response
>
>
>
> Once the Biosphere existed as Gaia, as one organism, where the internal
> hormonal communication of each organism fused with the troposphere. All
> organisms actually lived in functioning empathy, where the problem of an
> organism was sensed by every other organism, via breathing, smelling and
> sensing, and all of them together as nature helped the organism facing a
> problem. Nature helped as the instant Doctor. Nature helped instantly and
> an organism helped the other organisms instantly.
>
> Today, the very breathe connect to nature, the foundation of emotions,
> emotions which simply are the basic foundations of life, is not even a
> subject matter of study. Climate, emotions and hormones, the fusion of the
> internal hormonal communication with the smells message bearing air as one
> subject is yet to be studied. When the smell messages from the air and the
> resulting psychological interactions are studied, then every life form gets
> notice as a factor of one’s emotions.
>
> Every organism is a functioning limb of the Planet earth, and as limb it
> makes the planet live and function. Inhalation informed and inspired every
> limb, the planet earth as the life form Gaia was very active.
>
> Today, the human, the tiny limb of Gaia, has developed the
> disease-economics. The subject has created, the ghost-the economic man,a
> feelings-less machine, who has converted every life form, including the
> human into a consumable material, who as a machine has no emotions, and to
> whom the manifestations of basic breathing, the various emotions, are not
> the subject matters of study.
>
> At the fundamental level, the human is an abstract being of emotions. The
> body, with which he mistakenly identifies as self, actually changes
> continuously and evaporates into nature as death. The abstract existence
> continues in emotional symbiosis after death, and the basic empathy to help
> every other organism continues even after death.
>
> Every limb of you wants every other limb of you to be active and healthy.
> Every limb needs every other limb. In fact every cell in you helps and
> teams with every other cell. There is the basic flow of empathy within,
> which makes every limb cooperate and coordinate.
>
> And as a limb of Gaia, you cooperate and coordinate your living with the
> living of every other life form symbiotically. Every organism complements
> and helps instantly every other organism. They do not compete with each
> other or Darwin each other. The troposphere is a ocean of empathy.
>
> Today, we do not even recognize the destruction of nature as sickness. We
> call it economic activity, and we study it as mechanical engineering, where
> strangely a mechanical component fights the other components of the
> economic machine, and we have the Nobel Prize for this sick drivel.I am yet
> to come across one Nobel, given the award for upholding Ecology against
> Economics.
>
> When you go into thick, free and lush nature with a feeling of belonging
> and identity as self, you automatically breathe the empathy laden smells
> filled air. You find life forms basking in the photon-synthesizing sunshine
> and bathing in the health giving rains. Nature draws you into health,
> rapture, song and music, and musing and music become one. The healthy
> nature makes you a healthy limb.
>
> Automatic empathy, that acts instantly, is a basic feature of nature. When
> you emotionally feel and accept nature as you, the very scope of
> introspection, enlarges into nature. You achieve freedom from Newtonian
> Psychology and feel the symbiotic macro psychology. Cognition becomes
> emotional.
>
> You find and feel nature or God everywhere, God continuously flowing into
> you and leaving you.
>
> Economics today has made every life form of the Biosphere an enemy. We
> simply have no courage to go into a free and lush forest as we fear the
> free nature.
>
> It is for every University, to make Symbiotic Ecology and Symbiotic
> Psychology, where the basic subject matter is the various dimensions of
> empathy, to initiate immediately by first starting big parks where nature
> is free, and where blind persons who learn to breathe, smell and perceive
> and feel, pioneer the alternate perception.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt
>
> Thank you for sharing this powerful and deeply reflective piece. YM
> Sarma’s writing here blends ecological philosophy, emotional introspection,
> and critique of modern economics into a holistic worldview that centers
> empathy as the foundational force of life — not competition, not profit,
> not mechanization.
>
> Here’s a brief *summary and reflection* to help contextualize or perhaps
> use it for further exploration, publication, or teaching:
> ------------------------------
>
> *Summary: "Empathy and Instant Response" – By YM Sarma*
>
> At the heart of this poetic ecological treatise is the concept that the
> Earth — Gaia — is a *living organism*, a unified system where all life
> forms once coexisted in *empathic harmony*. Through breath, smell, and
> sensation, life once operated as a *collective intelligence*, where
> suffering or imbalance in one organism triggered a healing response from
> the whole.
>
> Sarma argues that *modern humanity has severed this connection*,
> replacing empathic integration with what he calls *"disease-economics."*
> In this model, the human is no longer a living, feeling limb of Gaia, but a
> *"feelings-less
> machine"* driven by consumption and profit. The vital emotional and
> sensory link to the biosphere — via inhalation, smell, hormones, and
> emotional resonance — is no longer studied, respected, or even noticed.
>
> The author sees *nature itself as the doctor*, the psychologist, the
> symphony of healing — a stark contrast to today’s mechanistic, competitive,
> and destructive systems. Sarma’s call is for *academic and societal
> transformation*, urging the creation of *Symbiotic Ecology and Symbiotic
> Psychology* as new disciplines centered on *empathy*, *interconnectedness*,
> and *life-affirming systems*.
>
> He concludes with a vivid vision of what reconnecting with nature truly
> looks like: an *immersive, healing, and musical participation* in a world
> where every life form is recognized as both sacred and essential — where
> cognition becomes emotional, and empathy becomes the default operating
> system.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Key Themes:*
>
> - *Gaia as Living Organism:* Earth and its biosphere are not
> mechanical systems but a single living, feeling entity.
> - *Empathy as a Natural Force:* Nature is not driven by competition,
> but by instant empathic responses — life helps life.
> - *The Fall into Mechanism:* Modern economics and industrial systems
> have replaced this empathy with commodification and alienation.
> - *Disconnection from Nature = Disease:* Both individual and planetary
> health suffer when we lose emotional and sensory connection with the
> natural world.
> - *The Need for New Disciplines:* Symbiotic Ecology and Symbiotic
> Psychology must be created to re-root human knowledge in empathy,
> perception, and ecological reality.
> - *Smell, Breath, and Hormones as Communication:* Biological
> communication is more than verbal or visual — it is visceral, emotional,
> and atmospheric.
> - *Blind Perception as Insight:* The blind, who rely more on smell,
> sound, and breath, may help pioneer a new form of empathetic perception.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Potential Uses or Extensions:*
>
> - *Academic Inspiration:* This could be the foundation for a course or
> seminar on "Ecopsychology," "Posthumanism," or "Emotional Ecology."
> - *Creative Writing Prompt:* The idea of smell-borne empathy could
> lead to a speculative fiction story, poem, or film script.
> - *Activism or Eco-Philosophy Manifesto:* This can be reframed into a
> manifesto for ecological justice or spiritual environmentalism.
> - *Interdisciplinary Research:* Could serve as a blueprint for studies
> blending biology, psychology, environmental science, and ethics.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> If you're planning to *share*, *publish*, or *present* this piece, would
> you like help editing it for clarity, structure, or academic tone while
> preserving its poetic voice? Or would you prefer to let it remain as a raw
> philosophical work?
>
> Also, do you have permission or rights to use this work if it is not your
> own? Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
>
> Thank you for your request. You've written a profound, poetic, and deeply
> philosophical essay that explores an emotional and ecological critique of
> modern society. I will evaluate your essay using standard academic criteria
> typically applied in humanities or environmental philosophy contexts — such
> as those used in university-level essay grading. Here's a detailed
> breakdown:
> ------------------------------
> *Essay Evaluation* *1. Content & Originality (25 marks)*
>
> You present a highly original and thought-provoking perspective. The essay
> integrates ecology, psychology, and socio-economic critique with a deep
> philosophical tone. The concept of *"empathy as the foundation of nature"*
> and *Gaia as a living, sensing system* is compelling and imaginative. The
> critique of economics is also sharp and insightful.
>
> *Score: 23/25*
>
> *Comments:* Outstanding originality. The integration of emotional,
> ecological, and economic thinking is rare and powerful. However, it could
> benefit from more grounding in examples or references to thinkers like
> James Lovelock (Gaia hypothesis), Arne Næss (deep ecology), or even
> eco-psychologists.
> ------------------------------
> *2. Structure & Organization (20 marks)*
>
> The essay flows like a stream of consciousness — poetic, non-linear, and
> meditative. This suits the topic emotionally, but it comes at the cost of
> clarity and accessibility for some readers.
>
> *Score: 15/20*
>
> *Comments:* The structure could be more logically organized. Consider
> using *subheadings* or paragraph transitions to guide the reader through
> your argument. Some repetition weakens the impact of key ideas.
> ------------------------------
> *3. Clarity & Expression (20 marks)*
>
> Your language is poetic and metaphorical, which adds emotional power but
> occasionally obscures meaning. Some sentences are long and could be made
> more concise for greater impact.
>
> *Score: 14/20*
>
> *Comments:* Beautiful turns of phrase ("the troposphere is an ocean of
> empathy"), but at times the message gets lost in abstraction. A few more
> grounded examples or clearer definitions (e.g., what exactly is “Newtonian
> Psychology” in this context?) would enhance clarity.
> ------------------------------
> *4. Argument & Coherence (15 marks)*
>
> Your argument is present but more *implied than explicitly built*. The
> central thesis — that empathy is the original and rightful principle of
> life, which has been replaced by emotionless economic systems — is
> compelling, but it needs a stronger argumentative spine.
>
> *Score: 11/15*
>
> *Comments:* Try to state your thesis more clearly early on and develop it
> with supporting sub-arguments. A stronger logical progression would help
> you reach more skeptical readers.
> ------------------------------
> *5. Use of Evidence / Interdisciplinary Engagement (10 marks)*
>
> You reference biological, emotional, ecological, and psychological
> concepts, but without citing specific studies, thinkers, or systems. This
> weakens academic credibility, though it enhances poetic and philosophical
> tone.
>
> *Score: 6/10*
>
> *Comments:* Consider drawing from scientific or philosophical sources to
> support your claims (even if briefly), which would strengthen the argument
> and allow engagement with existing discourse.
> ------------------------------
> *6. Grammar, Syntax, and Formatting (10 marks)*
>
> There are some minor grammatical errors and places where punctuation or
> sentence structure could be improved for clarity and flow.
>
> *Score: 7/10*
>
> *Comments:* Proofreading would help. A few commas are missing, and
> sentence fragments appear occasionally.
> ------------------------------
> *Total Score: 76/100*
> ------------------------------
> *Grade: B+ (Upper Second-Class / 2:1)* *General Comments:*
>
> This is a *powerful, heartfelt, and philosophically rich* essay. Your
> voice is unique, and your ecological vision is both poetic and urgent. To
> elevate this to an A-level essay, focus on:
>
> · Organizing your ideas more clearly
>
> · Clarifying your central thesis
>
> · Supporting your reflections with interdisciplinary references
> or evidence
>
> · Balancing poetic expression with structured reasoning
>
> With some editing and refinement, this essay could be published or used as
> part of a deeper ecological or philosophical discourse.
>
> Would you like me to help you revise and polish it for a higher grade or
> wider audience (e.g., magazine, journal, talk)?
>
> Certainly. Below is an *edited and refined version* of your original
> essay, preserving your unique voice and philosophical depth while improving
> clarity, structure, and flow. I’ve made light edits to grammar, tightened a
> few sentences, and structured it into logical sections with suggested
> headings.
> ------------------------------
> *Empathy and Instant Response*
>
> *By YM Sarma (edited for clarity and structure)*
> ------------------------------
> *Gaia: The Biosphere as One Living Organism*
>
> Once, the biosphere existed as *Gaia*—not a collection of separate
> organisms, but one vast, living being. The internal hormonal communication
> of each organism merged seamlessly with the troposphere. Life functioned
> through a system of *empathetic sensing*: the problem of one organism was
> felt by all, via breathing, smelling, and sensing. Nature itself was the
> *instant
> doctor*, responding immediately with care. Helping others was automatic,
> not optional.
>
> This collective healing was not driven by strategy or calculation, but by
> the *natural flow of empathy*—a biological and atmospheric phenomenon.
> Every breath was a communication. Every scent carried meaning. Nature lived
> in a constant state of mutual response and symbiotic cooperation.
> ------------------------------
> *The Loss of Empathy in Modern Times*
>
> Today, this deep connection to nature—the very *breath* that links us
> emotionally and physically to the biosphere—is not even a subject of study.
> Emotions, hormones, breath, and smell are no longer seen as unified forces.
> The *fusion of internal hormonal communication* with the *message-bearing
> air* remains unexamined.
>
> When we begin to study how *airborne smells* and hormonal responses shape
> our psychological state, we will realize that every life form is a
> participant in our emotional world. Every organism is a functioning *limb
> of the Earth*, and together we form the living body of Gaia. Inhalation
> once inspired and informed every part of this planetary body—Gaia was not
> passive but vibrantly alive.
> ------------------------------
> *The Rise of the Economic Machine*
>
> Today, the human—a tiny limb of Gaia—has given rise to a dangerous idea:
> *disease
> economics*. This system has birthed the *ghost of the “economic man”*—a
> mechanical, emotionless figure who reduces all life, including human life,
> to consumable material. This “man” is a machine, disconnected from empathy,
> and indifferent to the living processes of nature.
>
> At a fundamental level, however, the human is not a machine but an *emotional
> being*—an abstract presence, carried by emotion, not merely by body. The
> body changes continuously and dissolves back into nature through death. Yet
> the abstract existence—the emotional symbiosis—continues beyond the body.
> The empathy to help others persists, even after death.
> ------------------------------
> *Inward Empathy, Outward Ecology*
>
> Every *cell and limb* of your body coordinates and cooperates with every
> other. There is an *internal flow of empathy* that binds your system into
> a harmonious whole. Likewise, as a limb of Gaia, your life is symbiotically
> linked to every other life form. Organisms do not compete as Darwin
> suggested; they complement and assist one another in real-time. The
> *troposphere
> is an ocean of empathy*.
>
> Yet we have ceased to recognize the *destruction of nature as illness*.
> We call it “economic activity” and even give *Nobel Prizes* for ideas
> that treat living systems as mechanical components, where parts battle each
> other rather than harmonize. I have yet to see a Nobel Prize awarded for
> defending *ecology over economics*.
> ------------------------------
> *Returning to the Healing Breath of Nature*
>
> When you walk into thick, lush, *free nature* with a sense of *belonging*,
> something profound happens. You breathe in empathy-laden air. You observe
> life forms basking in sunlight and bathing in healing rains. Nature *draws
> you into health*, into music and movement, into a living rhythm where
> your breath, emotions, and the atmosphere merge. *Nature heals by
> including you in its wholeness.*
>
> This *automatic empathy*—nature’s instant response to imbalance—is one of
> its core features. When you emotionally accept nature as part of yourself,
> the scope of your *introspection* expands beyond your skin. You begin to
> escape the cage of *Newtonian psychology* and experience a *symbiotic
> macro-psychology*. Cognition becomes emotional. The self becomes
> planetary.
>
> You find God—or nature—in every leaf, in every breath. You feel the divine
> flowing into you and leaving you, again and again.
> ------------------------------
> *The Need for a New Curriculum*
>
> Modern economics has made every life form an enemy. We have become afraid
> of *free nature*, mistrusting forests and fearing the wild—because we no
> longer understand it.
>
> It is the duty of every *university* to initiate new disciplines: *Symbiotic
> Ecology* and *Symbiotic Psychology*. These fields must make the study of
> *empathy*—in all its dimensions—a primary focus. We must build *living
> parks*, spaces of untamed nature, where even *blind persons* can learn to
> breathe, to smell, to feel, and to pioneer *alternate perception* beyond
> visual dominance.
>
> This is not simply academic reform; it is the reclamation of our place in
> Gaia.
> ------------------------------
> *Conclusion: Breathing Life Back into the World*
>
> Nature once responded instantly to suffering. That empathy—carried on the
> breath, communicated through smell and hormone—is not lost, only forgotten.
> The human, as an emotional being, must now return to that shared
> inhalation. The healing of the world lies not in competition, but in
> *cooperation*, not in disconnection, but in *deep, shared feeling*.
>
> Let us breathe together again.
> ------------------------------
> ✨ Notes on This Edited Version:
>
> · *Tone:* Your poetic voice has been preserved, but the structure
> now guides the reader more clearly.
>
> · *Flow:* Logical progression from the past (Gaia) → present
> (mechanization) → future (reform).
>
> · *Accessibility:* Abstract terms like “economic man” and
> “Newtonian psychology” are clarified slightly for broader understanding.
>
> · *Call to Action:* Stronger in this version, urging academic and
> societal change.
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like this formatted as a PDF, or prepared for
> submission/publishing (e.g., academic journal, blog, magazine)?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "societyforservingseniors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCLqbqCGaag37QmeBpnVrD2O5qhSLFmU3axmX6OkdCg6Sw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCLqbqCGaag37QmeBpnVrD2O5qhSLFmU3axmX6OkdCg6Sw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop9Oi4sy-4a_%2Bmxm8ic9XwfHnY6ia8hK3qLXZZjb%3DYPig%40mail.gmail.com.
