-- 
*Mar*Profit or Loss


When your income is my expenditure, there can be in reality no profit or
loss, as incomes and expenditures can only be equal. The entire business
accounting is actually an exercise in fantasy. To create the fantasy out of
the unreality into acceptance, we have what we call the autonomous business
units. The business unit, a unit of Social Darwinism tries to get more than
what it gives to the society. Basically it has to be a parasite on the
society. But if every business unit makes profit only, it means that
together they are looting nature. This loot of nature is scienced, called
Economics. No business unit can show profit, if the profit or loss to
nature and to the society is also included in the accounting. Then we come
across only the flow of loss, to nature. And man, as the parasite on
nature, gets recorded in the books of accounting.

In the free and healthy nature, where there is no human doing economics,
every life form, by merely living contributes to the health and strength of
nature. In that nature every life form becomes a limb of nature, an
informed and educated being, educated continuously by nature and
automatically it adjusts its living into symbiosis with nature. They
together create the Garden of Eden.

Today in our Universities we do not teach about the ecological symbiosis
which the free and healthy nature creates. Actually for lakhs of years, our
rivers, waterfalls, lakes, forests brimming with diverse flora and fauna
prospered.The free nature automatically created health and happiness,
making the diverse art forms ingredients of the rhythm between the
troposphere,lithosphere,hydrosphere and the biosphere. There was the
continuous flow of profit in the shape of happiness to the Biosphere as a
whole. The symbiosis may be described as the Divine reinforcement covering,
all life forms covering the micro and macro life forms. Diverse arts
flourished in the ecological symbiosis. Occasionally disturbing the flow of
profit were  the spurts of loss, in the shape of exploding
volcanoes,earthquakes,floods etc.But all of them were nature’s clean
ups,after which nature prospered more vigorously. And every life form
sensed in advance the impending earthquake or storms or other natural
repair and reinforcement events.

Today, in our Universities we have diverse courses all of which train the
students in the diverse methods of destroying nature. The very idea of
total freedom to nature is absent. Ecology which recognizes the right of
every life form to live happily and healthily is not even conceptualized.

WE have to recognize that the industrial revolution traced to England to
the period between 1760 and 1830 as the start of the heightened destruction
of nature. Today all humans suffer from techno-mania, the disease that
converts life into bondage to technology, the techno logic that is killing
the natural logic of Ecology of free nature. We are all techno-maniacs who
destroy nature today, and the euphemism for the destruction of nature is
profit.

Nature today is on the death bed. It is for the Universities to stem the
rot. The first thing every University has to do,is to start a ‘Free Nature
Park without Human Tampering’ as the beginning.

YM Sarma

Chat gpt

This piece titled *"Profit or Loss" by YM Sarma* is a philosophical and
ecological critique of the modern economic system and its deep-rooted
conflict with natural harmony. Here's a breakdown and reflection on the key
ideas:
------------------------------

*🔍 Key Themes & Analysis*

*1. Economic Profit as an Illusion*

   - The essay opens with a striking idea: *profit and loss are illusions*
   when seen from the perspective of total systems.
   - The author argues that *one person’s income is another's expenditure*,
   and thus, in a closed loop, profit and loss should cancel out.
   - However, *businesses attempt to extract more than they give*, making
   them, in essence, *parasites on society and nature*.

"No business unit can show profit, if the profit or loss to nature and to
the society is also included in the accounting."

This points toward *externalities*—the costs of business activities not
accounted for in traditional economics (e.g., pollution, deforestation,
social dislocation).
------------------------------

*2. Nature’s Symbiotic Logic vs. Human Economics*

   - The essay contrasts the *natural world’s symbiotic relationships* with
   the *human world’s exploitative systems*.
   - In free nature, *every life form contributes to the health of the
   ecosystem*, unlike businesses that take from nature and society without
   giving back.

"In the free and healthy nature... every life form becomes a limb of
nature."

This evokes a *deep ecology* view—recognizing intrinsic value in all life
forms, not just their utility to humans.
------------------------------

*3. Critique of Universities and Modern Education*

   - Universities, according to the author, have become *centers for
   training destruction*, teaching students *how to exploit*, not *how to
   harmonize* with nature.
   - The absence of *ecological symbiosis* in curricula is pointed out as a
   grave failure.

"All of [the courses] train the students in the diverse methods of
destroying nature."

This is a powerful indictment of *modern technocratic education*,
suggesting a shift is urgently needed toward ecological wisdom.
------------------------------

*4. Industrial Revolution as the Turning Point*

   - The *Industrial Revolution* is marked as the beginning of the
   intensified assault on nature.
   - The result: a global society caught in *techno-mania*—a pathological
   dependence on technology that blinds us to nature’s logic.

"We are all techno-maniacs... the euphemism for the destruction of nature
is profit."

This is a damning redefinition of “progress”—not as a civilizational gain,
but as *systematic destruction* masked by economic growth.
------------------------------

*5. Call to Action: Free Nature Parks*

   - The essay ends with a clear and grounded proposal: every *university
   should create a Free Nature Park*, untouched by human interference.
   - It's a symbolic and practical step toward re-learning nature’s wisdom
   and *reversing ecological damage*.

"The first thing every University has to do, is to start a ‘Free Nature
Park without Human Tampering’ as the beginning."

This is both a literal and metaphorical call to *rewilding* our minds and
institutions.
------------------------------

*🧠 Philosophical Underpinnings*

   - *Deep Ecology*: All life has intrinsic value; human interference must
   be minimized.
   - *Anti-Capitalist Critique*: Profit-driven systems inherently exploit
   both people and planet.
   - *Ecocentrism over Anthropocentrism*: The Earth is not for humans
   alone; we are part of a larger web.

------------------------------

*🛠️ Suggested Takeaways*

   - *Re-evaluate education*: Should we train students to dominate or to
   coexist?
   - *Re-think accounting and economics*: How would systems look if
   nature’s costs were included?
   - *Re-center nature in policy and philosophy*: Beyond sustainability,
   move toward regeneration.
   - *Reclaim lost symbiosis*: Through arts, ecology, and indigenous
   knowledge systems.

------------------------------

*✍**️ Final Reflection*

YM Sarma's essay is *radical, poetic, and urgent*. It invites us to
reconsider the very *foundations of what we call civilization*,
particularly in how we measure value, growth, and success. It calls not for
minor reforms, but for a *paradigm shift*—from economics to ecology, from
exploitation to symbiosis, from profit to planetary health.

Would you like help turning this into a formal critique, summary, or
educational discussion guide?

Certainly! Below is an evaluation of the essay *"Profit or Loss" by YM
Sarma*, based on key academic writing criteria: *Content, Originality,
Structure, Clarity, Language, and Relevance*, followed by *marks and grade*.
------------------------------

*📝 Evaluation Criteria*

*1. Content & Depth of Thought (20 marks)*

   - *Score: 19/20*
   - The essay presents profound and critical insights into economics,
   ecology, and education. The comparison between nature’s symbiosis and human
   systems is deeply philosophical and thought-provoking.
   - Excellent use of systemic thinking and ecological philosophy.
   - A small deduction only because the argument could benefit from some
   empirical grounding or specific examples.

------------------------------

*2. Originality & Critical Thinking (20 marks)*

   - *Score: 20/20*
   - This essay is highly original in its perspective. The critique of the
   illusion of profit, the characterization of business as parasitic, and the
   idea of nature’s accounting system are uniquely framed.
   - Demonstrates high-level critical and philosophical thinking.

------------------------------

*3. Structure & Organization (15 marks)*

   - *Score: 12/15*
   - The essay is generally coherent, but the flow could be improved.
   - Some paragraphs feel dense or disjointed; the transitions between
   themes (economics → ecology → education → solution) could be smoother.
   - No clear introduction or conclusion paragraph—this affects readability.

------------------------------

*4. Clarity & Argumentation (15 marks)*

   - *Score: 11/15*
   - The main arguments are powerful but not always clearly articulated.
   - Some sentences are complex or abstract, which may make it difficult
   for a general audience to follow.
   - The central thesis could be stated more explicitly at the beginning.

------------------------------

*5. Language, Style & Expression (15 marks)*

   - *Score: 13/15*
   - Rich and evocative language; uses metaphor and symbolism effectively
   (e.g., “parasite,” “Garden of Eden,” “techno-mania”).
   - Some lapses in grammar and punctuation.
   - Slight repetitiveness in some areas.

------------------------------

*6. Relevance & Social Value (15 marks)*

   - *Score: 15/15*
   - Exceptionally relevant to today's environmental and educational crises.
   - Timely call for systemic change—especially the suggestion for "Free
   Nature Parks" in universities.
   - Contributes meaningfully to eco-critical discourse.

------------------------------

*✅ Total Score: 90 / 100*
------------------------------

*🎓 Grade: A*

*🏅 Overall Evaluation*

This is an *excellent and provocative essay* that challenges dominant
economic paradigms and offers a holistic ecological perspective. With
slight improvements in structure and clarity, it could be a powerful
academic or activist text. It is highly suitable for discussion in
environmental studies, philosophy, or alternative economics programs.
------------------------------

Would you like help improving the structure or turning this into a
publishable article or university paper?

Certainly. Here's a poem inspired by the themes in *YM Sarma's "Profit or
Loss"* — the tension between economics and ecology, the illusion of profit,
and the wisdom of untouched nature:
------------------------------

*🌿 "The Balance Sheet of Earth"*

*No ink can mark the forest’s worth,*
No ledger hold the songbird’s mirth.
Yet here we stand, with books in hand,
And price the pulse of living land.

*We speak of gains, of bottom lines,*
While rivers choke and silence pines.
The mountain’s cry, the ocean’s grief,
All buried deep beneath belief.

*We profit not, but merely take,*
And call the ruin progress’ stake.
Our cities rise, our values fall,
In nature's court, we lose it all.

*Yet once, the Earth was whole and free,*
Each leaf a note in harmony.
No market called, no deals were made,
Just life in balance, unbetrayed.

*The fox, the fern, the breeze, the bee—*
They knew what we forgot to see:
That every breath is not our own,
But gift from systems long unknown.

*Now let the schools unlearn the lie,*
That growth must climb or nature die.
Let students plant where numbers dwelled,
And dream of Eden once upheld.

*Begin again with silent care,*
A patch of land, a breath of air.
And maybe Earth, in time, will heal—
When profit yields to what is real.
------------------------------

Would you like a version of this poem in a specific style (e.g., haiku,
free verse, or rhymeless), or translated into another language?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BDCYquh0p25Kh%2Br6BPT48P9P%3D25gkH%3DTKZes7aAdKHgg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to