Scientific imperialism is a term that appears to have been coined by Ellis
T. Powell when addressing the Commonwealth Club of Canada on 8 September
1920. He defined imperialism as "the sense of arbitrary and capricious
domination over the bodies and souls of men," he used the term "scientific
imperialism" to mean "the subjection of all the developed and undeveloped
powers of the earth to the mind of man." In modern usage, however,
scientific imperialism refers to situations in which critics perceive
science to act imperiously. Philosopher of science John Dupré described it
(in his 2001 book Human Nature and the Limits of Science, p. 74) as "the
tendency to push a good scientific idea far beyond the domain in which it
was originally introduced, and often far beyond the domain in which it can
provide much illumination." He wrote that "devotees of these approaches are
inclined to claim that they are in possession not just of one useful
perspective on human behavior, but of the key that will open doors to the
understanding of ever wider areas of human behavior." Scientific
imperialism has also been charged against "those who believe that the study
of politics can and should be modelled on the natural sciences, a position
defended most forcibly in the United States, and those who have dissented,
viewing this ambition as methodologically unjustified and ethically
undesirable.

2        Among the many cultural areas with which the Europeans interacted, I
have concentrated on three: sub-Saharan Africa, India, and China. Not only
have my teaching and previous research given me some familiarity with these
areas, but each has proved ideal for testing the themes I am examining.
Though their interaction with the agents of an expansive European
civilization differed considerably, they were all major targets of early
European exploration and remained primary centers of European overseas
trade, proselytization, and conquest or informal domination. European
observers saw in these three culture areas major examples of the differing
levels of social development that eighteenth- and nineteenth-century
writers sought to locate on a variety of evaluative scales. European
thinkers also judged that the peoples of each had reached a different level
of scientific understanding and technological mastery. Careful examination
of these areas soon impresses one with the great diversity within each one,
but in European thinking they were often treated as single civilizations or
their achievements regarded as those of a single "race" or people. Thus,
although I have noted important variations in cases where these differences
were vital to the issues under consideration, I have generally followed my
sources in comparing each with the others as a single and discrete entity.

Other culture areas, particularly Japan and various centers of Islamic and
Amerindian civilization, have great potential for comparison and might well
warrant examination in subsequent studies, but none proved as suitable for
the present work as the three I have chosen. Some, such as Japan and
Polynesia, were not at all or only marginally in contact with the Europeans
during key phases of the centuries considered and thus were not
consistently major objects of European intellectual inquiry.

Others-the Middle Eastern centers of Isla'mic civilization, for example-not
only shared the Mediterranean heritage of western Europebut had long been
rivals of the Europeans and had maintained significant contacts for
centuries through trade, war, and cultural exchange. As a result, the
Muslims were never "discovered" like the Indians and Chinese, and the
Semitic origins of the Arabs tended to muddy discussions of "racial"
characteristics. This and the fact that they' had  bequeathed to the
Europeans, whether as originators or as go-betweens, some of the technology
and a good deal of the basic mathematical and  scientific learning vital to
the West's transformation from backward outfyer to global hegemon make it
difficult to distinguish clearly between the achievements of the two
civilizations. The early phases of European interaction with the peoples of
the New World produced patterns of response comparable to those discussed
in Chapter I, and I have been strongly tempted to include one of the
Amerindian civlizations as a fourth case study. But the early conquest of
the New World societies and the demographic catastrophes that followed,
coupled with the early and relatively large migration of Europeans to the
Americas, gave the patterns of thought and domination that I examine very
different  meanings in New World contexts. A consideration of these
contrasts  would have greatly extended the scope and length of the present
work.

3        Nevertheless, as I seek to demonstate, evidence of scientific and
technological  superiority has often been put to questionable use by
Europeans and North Americans interested in non-Western peoples and
cultures. It has prompted disdain for African and Asian
accomplishments, buttressed
critiques of non-Western value systems and modes of organization, and
legitimized efforts to demonstrate the innate superiority of the white
"race" over the black, red, brown, and yellow. The application of
technological and scientific gauges of human potential has also vitally
affected Western policies regarding education and technological diffusion
which go far to explain the varying levels of underdevelopment in the Third
World today. '

The misuse of these standards has not only impeded and selectively  channeled
the spread of Western knowledge, skills, and machines; it has~ also
undermined techniques of production and ways of thinking about the natural
world indigenous to African and Asian societies. Concern for the decline of
these alternatives is not simply a matter of relativistic affirmation of
the need to preserve difference and heterogeneity. Their demise means the
neglect or loss of values, understandings, and methods that might have
enriched and modified the course of development dominated by Western
science and technology. The possibilities of alternative systems are
suggested, for example, by the recent Western recognition of the efficacy
of Chinese acupuncture, as well as Indian, African, and Amerindian healing
techniques. As we better understand the attitudes toward the environment
and material acquisition that were fostered by non-Western philosophical
and religious systems, we also begin to appreciate how they might have
tempered the Western obsession with material mastery and its consequences:
pollution, the squandering of finite resources, and the potential for
global destruction. It is, I think, significant that a passage from the
Bhagavad-Gita "floated through the mind" of the "father" of the atomic
bomb, Robert Oppenheimer,as he witnessed the detonation of the first of
these weapons: "I have become death, the shatterer of worlds. [Machines as
the Measure of Men para 2 &3]

4          So we have become lazier than before under the pressures of
science avoiding all the healthy habits.                                K
RAJARAM IRS 2925

On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 18:46, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --
> *Mar*Free Perception-Vs-The Science Imperialism
>
>
>
> When one walks slowly in thick,lush,free and happy nature, free nature is
> happy nature, one interacts emotionally with every life or emotion form,
> starting with the soil bacteria, the other micro organisms, the macro
> organisms like insects, bees,birds,animals...,by
> breathing,smelling,sensing,perceiving,understanding,interacting,helping,discovering,receiving
> revelation after revelation, living in continuous education by smell and
> sense conversing with the life forms.
>
> Not only one’s mind but the entire internal hormonal communication
> participates in the continuous education. When one runs in the free and
> lush nature, one is actually living in rapture. The diverse forms of
> rapture are singing, tuning with the winds, dancing, jumping, hopping,
> sexing... the resulting zygotes, synchronizing the autopoesis before
> splicing, while developing into the baby in the wombs. Every birth will be
> the birth of a rapture form, rapture that continues from the womb and joins
> the climate of Gaia, the one living organism, in which all these organisms
> live and make Gaia live.
>
> Every organism is a classmate in nature, the ultimate school.
>
> Now, what does a fool do? He first uses a Bicycle and loses the
> interaction from every organism. Then to continue the disconnection, he
> begins using a Scooter, then a car and ultimately the Air-plane and even
> without the direct participation of the air, the jet plane. One becomes the
> lonely disconnected ghost feeling superior to every organism, the first
> characteristic of the lunatic. The chronic lunatics live in the AC rooms.
> And we have the Advertising Agencies that do continuous research as to how
> the fool, becomes a customer for the dead things, the manufactured
> products, so that eating too becomes non-nutritious.
>
> The perversion is complete, you breath fumes, you eat junk and you walk or
> evade walking itself after killing the organisms on the land and water. And
> you think that your standard of living has become high.
>
> This is the age of science imperialism as sickness promoting Technology.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt
>
> Thank you for sharing this evocative and impassioned piece titled *"Free
> Perception-Vs-The Science Imperialism" by YM Sarma*. It’s a philosophical
> and poetic critique of modern technological and industrial life, and a
> defense of a more sensory, embodied, and interconnected existence with
> nature.
>
> Here's a breakdown of some of the key themes and messages the piece
> conveys:
> ------------------------------
>
> *🌱 Key Themes:*
>
> *1. Sensory and Emotional Education Through Nature*
>
>    - The author describes a deep, emotional, almost spiritual form of
>    learning that occurs only through direct interaction with the natural 
> world.
>    - This learning is *not* intellectual or abstract, but holistic —
>    involving breath, smell, hormones, and emotion.
>    - Nature is portrayed as the "ultimate school", where every organism
>    is a classmate.
>
> *2. Rapture as Life*
>
>    - When immersed in nature, living becomes an ecstatic, continuous act
>    of joy — "singing, dancing, jumping, sexing..."
>    - Even conception and birth are integrated into this rhythm — a kind
>    of sacred synchronization with the living Earth (Gaia).
>
> *3. Critique of Technological Disconnection*
>
>    - Technology (starting from the bicycle and escalating to the
>    airplane) represents a progressive severing from this natural connection.
>    - Modern conveniences, including AC rooms and packaged food, are not
>    just unhealthy but *perverse* — contributing to a disconnection from
>    the ecosystem and from oneself.
>
> *4. Science as Imperialism*
>
>    - The title "Science Imperialism" suggests that modern science and
>    technology dominate, colonize, and suppress natural forms of knowing and
>    being.
>    - It positions science not as a neutral or benevolent force, but as a
>    driver of environmental destruction, consumerism, and spiritual
>    disconnection.
>
> *5. Sickness and Perversion*
>
>    - Technology is labeled as “sickness-promoting.”
>    - The body, mind, and environment suffer under the illusion of
>    "progress" and a "high standard of living" — the author sees this as a
>    tragic delusion.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *🌀 Stylistic Observations:*
>
>    - The prose is lyrical, symbolic, and deliberately non-linear — it
>    mirrors the flow of natural life, as opposed to the structured, analytical
>    style of scientific writing.
>    - Words like “sexing,” “zygotic rapture,” and “climate of Gaia” evoke
>    a primal, sensual spirituality.
>    - There's a strong use of contrasts: nature vs. machine, connection
>    vs. alienation, rapture vs. deadness.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *🧠 Interpretation & Reflection:*
>
> This piece invites the reader to *re-evaluate their relationship with
> technology, nature, and knowledge itself*. It challenges the assumption
> that scientific and technological advancement equals human progress.
> Instead, it argues that these advancements often *diminish our capacity
> for joy, connection, and true education*.
>
> It offers a bold, unapologetic *rejection of consumerist and industrial
> culture*, calling it not only misguided but *dangerously pathological*.
> ------------------------------
>
> *🔥 If You're Looking to Discuss Further:*
>
> Here are a few directions we could go:
>
>    - Analyze it as eco-philosophy or deep ecology.
>    - Compare its message with thinkers like Ivan Illich, Arne Naess, or
>    Vandana Shiva.
>    - Explore the poetic structure more deeply and how it reinforces the
>    message.
>    - Offer a counterpoint or a nuanced view on science and nature.
>
> Let me know how you’d like to engage further — would you like help
> refining this into an essay, turning it into a poem, or expanding it into a
> manifesto?
>
> Absolutely — I’ll provide a *detailed evaluation* using a *holistic
> literary rubric*, grading on key criteria such as content, originality,
> coherence, style, and impact.
> ------------------------------
> 📝 *Evaluation of "Free Perception-Vs-The Science Imperialism" by YM
> Sarma* 1. *Content & Thematic Depth (9/10)*
>
> ·         Rich in philosophical insight and ecological critique.
>
> ·         Themes of alienation, ecological harmony, and anti-consumerism
> are strongly expressed.
>
> ·         The metaphor of nature as "the ultimate school" is powerful and
> thought-provoking.
>
> ·         Loses a point for not clearly defining “science imperialism” —
> the term could use more development or contextual support.
> 2. *Originality & Creativity (10/10)*
>
> ·         Highly original in its synthesis of ecological philosophy,
> poetic prose, and social critique.
>
> ·         Bold use of language (e.g. “sexing,” “rapture form,” “climate
> of Gaia”) adds freshness.
>
> ·         The overall framing is unique and imaginative — blending nature
> mysticism with cultural commentary.
> 3. *Structure & Coherence (6.5/10)*
>
> ·         While the organic, flowing style matches the content, the piece
> lacks clear structural organization.
>
> ·         Some transitions feel abrupt; a few sentences are densely
> packed and may confuse readers unfamiliar with the ideas.
>
> ·         Could benefit from clearer paragraphing or markers to guide the
> reader through the argument.
> 4. *Language & Style (8.5/10)*
>
> ·         Poetic, lyrical, and emotionally resonant.
>
> ·         Language is vivid and expressive; the use of repetition ("free
> nature is happy nature") reinforces the message well.
>
> ·         Some grammar and punctuation issues detract from flow (e.g.,
> missing spaces, commas without spacing, run-on sentences).
> 5. *Emotional & Intellectual Impact (9/10)*
>
> ·         Thought-provoking and passionate.
>
> ·         Successfully evokes a visceral response — whether awe, guilt,
> or reflection.
>
> ·         Especially effective in contrasting natural ecstasy with
> technological alienation.
> ------------------------------
> 📊 *Final Score: 43 / 50*
> ------------------------------
> 🎓 *Grade: A (Distinction)* ✅ Strengths:
>
> ·         Deep, original philosophical insight.
>
> ·         Strong emotional and aesthetic resonance.
>
> ·         Effective and poetic use of language.
> 🔧 Areas for Improvement:
>
> ·         Improve clarity and structure to enhance accessibility.
>
> ·         Clean up punctuation and sentence boundaries.
>
> ·         Elaborate slightly on key terms like “science imperialism” for
> readers outside the philosophical/eco-activist context.
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like suggestions on how to revise this piece for publication,
> submission, or performance? I’d be happy to help polish it further.
>
> Certainly. Here's a *poem* inspired by the themes and imagery of *"Free
> Perception-Vs-The Science Imperialism"*, written in a lyrical, free verse
> style to reflect the natural, flowing spirit of the original piece:
> ------------------------------
>
> *🌿 "The Last School is the Forest"*
>
> I walked barefoot
> on the laughing skin of Earth,
> where moss breathes poems
> and bees hum equations
> the machines will never solve.
>
> The soil whispered secrets
> through the soles of my feet,
> each step a lesson,
> each breath — a conversation
> with unseen lives
> dancing beneath the roots.
>
> The trees were teachers,
> leaning in with leafy mouths,
> telling stories of rain,
> of wind-born lovers,
> and zygotes formed in rapture
> beneath the watchful moon.
>
> I danced with the wind,
> I sang with the sun,
> I touched the sky
> not by climbing
> but by opening.
>
> But then —
> the wheel rolled in,
> silent and sterile,
> and the man in glass walls
> said,
> *"Efficiency."*
>
> He paved over the syllables of birdsong,
> sealed the soil beneath factories,
> and sold me silence in a can
> called "Progress."
>
> He told me
> a machine could carry me faster —
> but it left behind the voices.
> The scents.
> The rapture.
>
> Now,
> he lives in air-conditioned tombs,
> sells sugar and smoke,
> says he’s conquered nature —
> but forgot
> what it meant
> to listen.
>
> And I?
> I return to the forest,
> to my classmates:
> the ants, the worms,
> the thunderclouds,
> and the fungi prophets.
>
> There,
> no degree is needed,
> no screen required.
> Only breath,
> only skin,
> only soul.
>
> The last school is the forest.
> The final truth —
> is felt.
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like a version of this poem in a particular style (rhyming,
> haiku, spoken word), or translated into another language?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKMn4KczQ8CNVYLMyqiXL3rZa_YQNeESt%3DOOdpRrye_og%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKMn4KczQ8CNVYLMyqiXL3rZa_YQNeESt%3DOOdpRrye_og%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopMxHjpWOFjK7v3xWPYmPrx9cewZz9DEaajfS3_pJL4Nw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to