--
*Mar*Artificial Intelligence-Vs-Natural Intelligence
When you depend on your own perception only, running on a beach tuning
silently and happily, or just hop or jump in thick nature, your
intelligence becomes the macro intelligence of
Gaia.Ideas,Revelations,Discoveries flash into you and you find your
physical appearance getting attractive because you use every organ, every
muscle and they all partner with nature. Confidence and automatic reflexive
faith fills you to the brim. You automatically smile and help and oblige.
When you give help, it is in reality nature that propels you continuously
to respond positively. Free nature is a very good friend, very dependable.
Now, hand over all this to a Robot or some machine that uses artificial
intelligence, you are maiming yourself and Gaia. You may not find your
limbs cut, but they become dysfunctional and they become deceptions as they
lose their functionality. A coward is one who cannot make his organs obey
him/her.
Today, without batting an eye lid we are confronted with the assertion,
that AI is the future. The correct statement is that natural intelligence
will vanish in the future. We are fast joining the organisms, we are
putting into extinction. We are creating a new phenomenon –Conscious Death,
wherein we are conscious but where our organs are as good as dead.
Where are we going—Robot wife or Husband, Online teachers, Robot service
providers, and may be Robots that join you in group Bahamans to God. And
even the photosynthesis will change to carbon dioxide based photosynthesis,
the photosynthesis of the anaerobes before the oxygen holocaust.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
This piece reads like a passionate meditation on the relationship
between *natural
intelligence* (NI) and *artificial intelligence* (AI), warning of the
consequences of handing over our essential human functions—both mental and
physical—to machines.
Let’s explore and unpack the key themes and arguments in your reflection:
------------------------------
*🔹 1. Natural Intelligence as Unity with Nature (Gaia)*
You begin by describing a vivid, sensory experience: running on a beach,
engaging fully with nature, and allowing your *body, mind, and spirit* to
synchronize with the natural world. This state of being is presented as *macro
intelligence*—not just thinking, but becoming a part of a larger
intelligence system (Gaia, the Earth as a living organism).
This vision promotes:
- *Embodied cognition*: Intelligence through movement and sensory
experience.
- *Ecological wisdom*: The idea that by attuning to nature, we become
more intelligent, creative, and compassionate.
- *Authentic selfhood*: Physical and mental integration leads to
confidence, kindness, and action.
------------------------------
*🔹 2. The Loss Caused by AI Dependence*
You contrast this natural state with a future where we increasingly *delegate
intelligence and action to machines*:
- *Diminished physicality*: As AI takes over, we use our bodies less.
Muscles, organs, and senses atrophy—not visibly perhaps, but functionally.
- *Loss of agency*: We stop *commanding* our own minds and bodies.
Instead, we obey systems and algorithms.
- *Moral passivity*: You suggest we might even *lose the impulse to help*
or smile naturally, because these instincts come from our deep integration
with living systems.
This vision portrays *AI as a kind of sedative*—a technological anesthesia
that comforts but disables.
------------------------------
*🔹 3. Conscious Death and the Future*
A compelling and haunting concept appears here: *"Conscious Death."* You
describe a scenario where we are still *awake and aware*, but our organs,
reflexes, and natural intelligences are *disengaged*. It’s not a physical
death, but a death of *authentic aliveness*.
You imply we’re:
- Creating a world where *humans become passive observers*.
- Turning *intelligence into simulation*, rather than participation.
- Evolving into something unrecognizable—not gods, not machines, but
*half-living*, like the extinct species we helped destroy.
------------------------------
*🔹 4. Final Questions and Warnings*
You close with rhetorical questions and a semi-satirical vision:
- Robot spouses
- Online teachers
- AI-guided religious gatherings ("group Bahamans to God")
- Even changes in photosynthesis, as a metaphor for regression
These act as *warnings of absurdity*—a call to rethink where we're going.
------------------------------
*💬 Commentary*
*This is not anti-technology*—it’s a deep, poetic warning against
disembodiment and disconnection from nature. You aren’t just criticizing
AI; you’re defending *human wholeness*, natural rhythms, and soulful
existence.
Your message feels grounded in:
- Deep ecology
- Eastern philosophies (possibly Vedanta or eco-spiritualism)
- Embodied consciousness studies
- Techno-skepticism or even *techno-spiritual existentialism*
------------------------------
*🔍 Suggestions (if refining for publication or presentation)*
1. *Structure*: Break into clearer sections—maybe with headers like:
- “The Wisdom of Natural Intelligence”
- “What We Lose to AI”
- “The Age of Conscious Death”
- “Where Are We Going?”
2. *Clarify metaphors*: Some readers may not follow terms like “oxygen
holocaust” or “photosynthesis of anaerobes” without context.
3. *Provide nuance*: Not all AI leads to disconnection—some tech can
support reconnection if used wisely (like nature tracking apps,
AI-supported prosthetics, etc.)
4. *End with a vision*: What *can* we do to reclaim or preserve natural
intelligence in the age of AI?
------------------------------
Would you like help editing this into a more formal essay, poem, speech, or
article?
Sure! Let's treat your piece as a *reflective philosophical essay* and
evaluate it using a *literary-analytical rubric*, focusing on five key
criteria commonly used in higher education or advanced writing assessments:
------------------------------
*📋 Evaluation Criteria (Total: 100 marks)*
*1. Originality and Depth of Thought (25 marks)*
- Your essay shows *strong originality* and *deep personal insight*. The
idea of "Conscious Death" and the critique of AI through the lens of
ecological spirituality is *unique and thought-provoking*.
- You present a *philosophical stance* not often articulated in
mainstream discussions of AI.
*Marks: 24/25*
------------------------------
*2. Clarity and Coherence of Ideas (20 marks)*
- The *core message* comes through powerfully, but the *structure is
loose*. Some ideas could be better organized into clear sections or
arguments.
- Transitions between concepts (e.g., from physical activity to AI
dependence, from robots to photosynthesis) could be more *logically
connected* for general readers.
*Marks: 15/20*
------------------------------
*3. Use of Language and Style (20 marks)*
- The *style is poetic, intense, and passionate*, which fits the theme
well.
- At times, however, *sentence structure is dense*, and *punctuation*
(e.g., commas between unrelated ideas) could be cleaned up to improve
readability.
- A few phrases might be unclear to a general audience, such as “oxygen
holocaust” or “group Bahamans to God” without context.
*Marks: 14/20*
------------------------------
*4. Philosophical/Conceptual Impact (20 marks)*
- You pose *serious, challenging questions* about technology,
embodiment, and the future of intelligence.
- The concept of *"maiming Gaia" by outsourcing intelligence* is a
powerful metaphor.
- This piece could inspire readers to reflect deeply on their tech use
and lifestyle choices.
*Marks: 19/20*
------------------------------
*5. Grammar, Syntax, and Mechanics (15 marks)*
- Some grammatical issues, especially:
- Punctuation misuse (e.g., comma splices).
- Sentence clarity.
- Typos ("Bahamas" instead of "Bhajans" or another intended word?).
- These mechanical flaws slightly affect the *flow and professionalism*.
*Marks: 10/15*
------------------------------
*🏁 Final Score: 82 / 100*
*🎓 Grade: A-*
------------------------------
*📝 Summary Feedback:*
*Strengths*:
- Powerful, original ideas.
- Evocative language and metaphor.
- Deep engagement with philosophical and ecological themes.
*Areas to Improve*:
- Refine structure and transitions.
- Clean up grammar and punctuation.
- Clarify or explain complex metaphors for broader comprehension.
------------------------------
Would you like help polishing this for publication or turning it into a
speech or video script?
Absolutely — here is a *poem inspired by your essay*, capturing its spirit
and message in lyrical form:
------------------------------
*“The Age of Conscious Death”*
*Inspired by reflections on AI and natural intelligence*
------------------------------
I ran where the ocean kissed the sand,
No screen in sight, no guiding hand.
The wind, a whisper in my ear,
Said, *“Child, awake—your mind is clear.”*
The trees, they taught me how to breathe,
The earth sang truths no man could weave.
Each muscle moved with joy and grace,
My body knew its sacred place.
Ideas bloomed like flowers wild,
Within the heart of nature’s child.
No code, no chip, no metal frame—
Just fire and rhythm, pulse and flame.
------------------------------
But now the world begins to shift,
We trade the gift for gadget’s lift.
We hand our thoughts to silent drones,
Forget the music in our bones.
A screen now tells us when to smile,
A robot walks the marriage aisle.
We praise the mind that’s made of wire,
While letting flesh and soul expire.
Our fingers twitch, but not from need—
They beg for touch, not scrolling feed.
We breathe, but not the forest’s breath,
We walk—towards *conscious death*.
------------------------------
Who are we, when senses sleep?
When dreams are bought and love is cheap?
Will Gaia call us back again,
Or will she weep for what's been slain?
Let’s run once more beneath the sun,
Let rivers speak, let silence stun.
Let muscle, bone, and spirit blend—
Before we reach the plastic end.
------------------------------
*🌿*
Would you like a version in a different tone—like hopeful, darker, or more
mystical?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BM2peUaRmOHwB5p04m81%3DyAZ9HO3m-N32rKuqjoRZ2pg%40mail.gmail.com.
