But sir we are all going out because of brahmin hatred in TN History cannot be always one sided. In our clan there were cruelties exerted on agriculturists also which was badly exploited by the politicians against the brahmins. We suffered but history is open KR IRS
On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 15:33, APS Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > I often used to feel that we would not have to undergo the hardships and > go to a foreign country for a job, had it not been for the land reform > system in Malabar, where I belonged. British as well as our own leaders > are to be blamed, without mentioning specific names. Thanks, Mani > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 2:27 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> HISTORY OF MAPLA MUSLIM REVOLUTIONS >> >> >> >> KR Mahatma Gandhi did only a fair deal for the nation in GOOD FAITH. >> Nehru was different. As Dharma was different from Krishna, so too was >> Gandhi and Nehru. We all knew CHE GUEVRA REVOLUTION; for them it is a >> freedom struggle but for USA it is revolt. 10,000 people were dead where >> majority were Muslims. Hindu Jenmis returned back only after 5 years. >> DIVIDE AND RULE PRACTICE OF THE BRITISH DEFINING JENMI AND TENURE WERE >> QUITE GOOD INITIALLY; But TIPUSULTAN BEAT THE BRITISH AND MUSLIMS WERE >> GIVEN THE HARNESS OVER THE JENMISLSS LANDS, WHERE JENMIS RAN AWAY BUT AFTER >> THE BRITISH KILLED TIPU AFTER 5 YEARS RETUNED BACK. Now the jenmis, >> reaction with the British were awful and trouble-shouted the reactions. So, >> tenure raised their voice against the rulers which was a freedom struggle >> as per Gandhi. Hindus took advantage of the losses in their absence when >> Tipu was in which could have been avoided. It was a Kila fat movement >> where many tenures were dead than the owners which we shall think over. >> History was cru because of the British. Where M K Gandhi is to be blamed >> who took the struggle against British and legal and not a Hindu muslim >> revolution at all? >> >> Land ownership in Malabar >> >> Freeman Freeman-Thomas, 1st Marquess of Willingdon, Governor of Madras >> during the Rebellions and later Viceroy and Governor-General of India >> >> Malabar's agricultural system was historically based on a hierarchy of >> privileges, rights and obligations for all principal social groups in what >> British administrator William Logan sometimes referred to as the "Father of >> Tenancy Legislation" in Malabar, describing it as a system of 'corporate >> unity' or joint proprietorship of each of the principal land right holders >> >> Jenmi >> >> The Jenmi, consisting mainly of the Namboothiri Brahmins and Nair >> chieftains, were the highest level of the hierarchy, and a class of people >> given hereditary land grants (''janmam'') by the Naduvazhis or rulers. The >> rights conveyed by this janmam were not a freehold in the European sense, >> but an office of dignity. Owing to their ritual status as priests >> (Nambudiris), the jenmis could neither cultivate nor supervise the land but >> would instead provide a grant of kanam (a form of land tenure) to a >> kanakkaran (holder of tenure) in return for a fixed share of the crops >> produced. Typically, a Jenmi would have a large number of kanakkarar under >> him. >> >> Verumpattakkaran >> >> The Verumpattakkarar, generally Thiyya and Mappila classes, cultivated >> the land but were also its part-proprietors under the kanakkarar. These >> classes were given a Verum Pattam (Simple Lease) of the land that was >> typically valid for one year. According to custom, they were also entitled >> to one-third or an equal share of the net produce. >> >> >> >> The net produce of the land was the share left over after providing for >> the cherujanmakkar or all the other birthright holders such as the village >> carpenter, the goldsmith and agricultural labourers who helped to gather, >> prepare and store produce. The system ensured that no Jenmi could evict >> tenants under him except for non-payment of rent. This land tenure system >> was generally referred to as the janmi-kana-maryada (customary practices). >> >> Land reforms and Mappila outbreaks >> >> During the Mysorean invasion of Malabar, the Jenmi took refuge in >> neighbouring states. The tenants and the Nair army men who could not escape >> were converted into Islam, as described in William Logan's Malabar Manual. >> Thus, Tipu Sultan's Kingdom of Mysore, having driven the Jenmi out of >> Malabar, reached accord with the Muslim Kanakkars. A new system of land >> revenue was introduced for the first time in the region's history with the >> government share fixed on the basis of actual produce from the land >> >> However, within five years, the East India Company took over Malabar, >> defeating Tipu Sultan and ending his reign over the region. This allowed >> the Jenmi to return to their homes and regain the lands lost during the >> Mysorean invasion, with the help of the Company administration and its duly >> constituted courts. The Company introduced several Western juridical >> concepts, such as that of absolute property rights, into the existing legal >> system of Malabar. Up until then, such rights had been unknown in the >> region and as a result all land became the private property of the Jenmi. >> This legal recognition gave them the right to evict tenants, which was in >> turn enforced through the colonial civil courts] In the words of William >> Logan: >> >> The [British] authorities, recognised the Janmi as absolute owner of his >> holding, and therefore free to take as big a share of the produce of the >> soil as he could get out of the classes beneath him... (Gradually) The >> British Courts backed up by Police and Magistrates and troops and big guns >> made the Janmi's independence complete. The hard terms thus imposed on the >> Kanakkaran had, of course, the effect of hardening the terms imposed by the >> Kanakkaran on those below him, the Verumpattakkar. The one-third of the net >> produce to which the Verumpattakkaran was customarily entitled, was more >> and more encroached upon as the terms imposed on the Kanakkaran became >> harder and harder. (Government of Madras. 1882, Vol. I: xvii, xxxi–ii) >> >> As conditions worsened, rents rose to as high as 75–80% of net produce, >> leaving the Verumpattakkar cultivators largely "only straw". This caused >> great resentment among the Mappilas, who, in the words of Logan, were >> "labouring late and early to provide a sufficiency of food for their wives >> and children". Resentment among the Muslim tentant population due to being >> vulnerable to rack renting, insecure tenancy, and eviction at the hands of >> Hindu landlords (jenmi) sustained by British courts, the Mappillas >> responded in a series of outbreaks, in which they wanted their own death, >> 29 in number, between 1836 and 1919 were suppressed. These usually involved >> the violence against Nambudiri and Nair landlords. During the nineteenth >> century conversions to Islam heightened dramatically as the backward caste >> Cheruman serfs embraced Islam so that they got liberation from the caste >> system and support from fellow Muslims to protest against jenmi tyranny. >> The colonial government referred to the outbreaks as "Moplah outrages", but >> modern historians tend to treat them as religious outbreaks or expressions >> of agrarian discontent. The outbreak of 1921–22 sustained this tradition of >> violence in Malabar with one crucial difference: this time it had also a >> political ideology and a formal organization. >> >> Khilafat Movement >> >> Diwan Bahadur C. Gopalan Nair in his book, The Moplah Rebellion >> 1921,writes thus: >> >> ...it was not mere fanaticism, it was not agrarian trouble, it was not >> destitution, that worked on the minds of Ali Musaliar and his followers. >> The evidence conclusively shows that it was the influence of the Khilafat >> and Non-co-operation movements that drove them to their crime. It is this >> which distinguishes the present from all previous outbreaks. Their >> intention was, absurd though it may seem, to subvert the British Government >> and to substitute a Khilafat Government by force of arms.(Judgement in Case >> No. 7 of 1921 on the file of the Special Tribunal, Calicut.) ... >> >> Nair noted Ali Musliyar rose to prominence at the instance of a Khilafat >> conference held in Karachi. Furthermore, Musliyar was not a native of >> Tirurangadi. He had only moved in 14 years earlier. So, according to Nair, >> there was not class revolt he was handling. It was a Khilafat edifice >> prepared and passed from distant Karachi, possibly controlled by spiritual >> leaders of Islam. >> >> The Khilafat movement was introduced into the district of Malabar on 28 >> April 1920, by a Resolution at the Malabar District Conference, held at >> Manjeri, the headquarters of Ernad Taluk. On 30 March 1921, there was a >> meeting at which one Abdulla Kutti Musaliar of Vayakkad lectured on >> Khilafat, in Kizhakoth Amsom, Calicut Taluk. And at a second meeting held >> the next day at Pannur Mosque, there was some unpleasantness between the >> Mappilas on one side, and Nairs and Tiyyar, who resented the Khilafat >> meeting, on the other. The Mappilas mustered the strength to attack the >> place of worship belonging to the Hindu Adhigari of the village >> >> Nature of attacks >> >> The Malabar Rebellion witnessed many attacks on British officers in the >> region. The Madras High Court, which adjudicated in this matter, had passed >> judgements on each of the cases against the various Mappila rioters who >> were captured. The Madras High Court said on the matter, >> >> It appears also that on the night of the 20th of August, at Nilambur 16 >> miles from Manjeri a police constable at Edavanna, were murdered and at >> Tiruvangadi in addition to Mr. Rowley and Lieutenant Johnston nine other >> persons were murdered. The police station at Manjeri was attacked on the >> night of the 21st; public officers at Manjeri on the 22nd. On the 24th of >> August Variyamkunnath Kunhahammad Haji who is described as the rebel leader >> arrived at Manjeri. All these incidents had occured when the respondent >> made the speech already referred to, and it was in such dangerous >> surroundings that he made it and the reference to Tiruvangadi in that >> speech has a consequence, a particular significance. Subsequent events are >> that on the 26th of August a retired police inspector was murdered at >> Anakayam near Manjeri by Variyamkunnath Kunhahammad Haji and his followers >> and on the 25th of August his head was paraded on a spear; and it was >> common ground that the respondent was at Manjeri from the morning of the >> 21st of August until the 30th of August. >> >> The District Magistrate stated that reliable information had been >> received about 180 forced conversions of Hindus and the actual total may >> run into thousands.[36] Roland E. Miller estimates forced conversions as in >> the range of 200 and 2500 In the aftermath of this violence, the Suddhi >> Movement was created by the Arya Samaj. They converted over 2,000 Hindus >> who had been forcibly converted to Islam by the Mappilas. Sumit Sarkar in >> Modern India quotes an Arya Samaj source that claimed about 600 Hindus were >> killed and 2,500 forcibly converted during the rebellion. Variyankunnath >> Kunjahammad Haji claimed to have killed the alleged British agents and >> spies responsible for the forced conversion of Hindus to Mohammadanism and >> killing others. However, their leader, Swami Shraddhananda was stabbed on >> 23 December 1926 by an Islamist at his Ashram. Some newspapers reported >> that certain districts were 'empty of Hindus.' >> >> Punishments of rebel leaders >> >> The following were the various leaders of the movement, who were >> sentenced to death following the Malabar Rebellion: >> >> >> >> Ali Musliyar, leader of the rebellion >> >> Kunhi Kadir, Khilafat Secretary, Tanur >> >> Variankunnath Kunhammad Haji >> >> Kunhj Koya, Thangal, President of the Khilafat Committee, Malappuram >> >> Koya Tangal of Kumaramputhur, Governor of a Khilafat principality >> >> Chembrasseri Imbichi Koya Thangal, notorious for his alleged killing of >> 38 men by slashing their necks and throwing them into a well >> >> Palakamthodi Avvocker Musaliar >> >> Konnara Mohammed Koya Thangal\ >> >> In its magnitude and extent, it was an unprecedented popular upheaval, >> the likes of which has not been seen in Kerala before or since. While the >> Mappilas were in the vanguard of the movement and bore the brunt of the >> struggle, several non-Mappila leaders actively sympathized with the rebels' >> cause, giving the uprising the character of a national upheaval In 1971, >> the Government of Kerala officially recognized the active participants in >> the events as "freedom fighters". >> >> K RAJARAM IRS 28825 >> >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 12:28, N Sekar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Sir. >>> >>> M K Gandhi, Nehru were worse compared to even Jinnah. >>> >>> Hindu Drokis. >>> >>> Just read what M K Gandhi advised Hindus to do when the Mopla massacre >>> of Hindus happened (it was distorted as freedom struggle) - M K G said to >>> kill, maim and rape is in their religious teachings and we, Hindus, should >>> understand it and offer no resistance. >>> >>> Just listen to Sai Deepak / Anand Ranganathan read from his writings to >>> prove what a Hindu Droke he was. >>> Pity is so many of us still vote for the INDI Alliance even though they >>> pour venom on Hindu religion and deride Bharat. Kashmiri Pandits, the >>> recent happening in West Bengal are all forgotten because it did not happen >>> to us. But that day is not far off. >>> >>> S C castigated Nupur Sharma (when she asked ONLY for clubbing of the >>> cases in one court) but others get ready bail and lecture to Hindus. >>> Because our voice of muffled the S C hears ONLY the Left's voice and they >>> are scared. >>> >>> Wakf Act verdict is still in abeyance. What is there to hear? Just say >>> without proper documents of Title no property can be claimed by any one, >>> including the Waqf. But we vote for the party which brought in the Waqf >>> Act. >>> >>> We are our own worst enemies Sir. We will die preaching secularism even >>> at the cost of destroying ourselves. I know there will be no support for >>> this as we need to be seen to be " secular" while others ahve no such >>> compulsion. >>> >>> N Sekar >>> >>> >>> >>> N >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, August 28, 2025 at 07:41:29 AM GMT+4, Suryanarayana >>> Ambadipudi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Just watch full Video and understand true face of #Gandhi and how गांधी >>> who was made #జాతిపిత_ మహాత్మా by British न #Congress pittoos contributed >>> to #Hindus n #Bharat !? The same गांधी gave #GandhiDynasty and >>> Nation_Hindus is facing the left over sufferings in the hands of >>> #నెహ్రూगांधी Dynasty!!?? >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop2K-qjm_iaR38Q68dMaoyqbjFwe0fVmx0gho3oS68bpQ%40mail.gmail.com.
