-- *Mar*The Loss of Paradigm
Paradigm is the connecting conceptual base for understanding. Without a paradigm, understanding is not possible.Once, the free and lush and healthy nature served as paradigm designated as God. Nature or God in those days was free and held as sacred. The association or identification with God every idea that sprouted as a result of hearing the sounds and musics of nature and the smell messages of diverse organisms were identified as the messages from God and people automatically adjusted their actions complementing nature. God or nature spoke continuously. People believed and strived to live symbiotically with nature. They basked in the natural environmental Theism and in the basic peace of mind. Actually the free and healthy nature, inspired the Building of astounding Temples with astounding architectures, and people adored the idol of God in the Temple and the Idol served as the paradigm for perception and understanding identified as revelations from God. The power of the Idol to function as the paradigm base rested on the free, lush and healthy nature surrounding the Temple. Prayer and recitation was the exercise to strengthen the paradigm or the belief that governed understanding. The paradigms branched into epics, which inspired poems, songs, dances and sculptures. The sounds of nature were converted into enchanting musics and songs, making them the paradigms of life. Every source of emotional communication was traced to particular organism or organisms, in certain cultures where every life form was given the position of emotional and perception complement. Thanks to mechanization, industrialization, urbanization and the routinized economic destruction of nature, we are simply left with no paradigms to connect for understanding.Today, we do not know what to believe and there are debate fests continuously. Any and every assertion can be logiced away by adopting the mechanical logic. Lies are asserted knowing that they are lies to live in the social Darwinism. Nature is removed from the pedestal as the paradigm base and we employ machines to give us verdicts. Day in and day out, nature is destroyed and diseased as economic activity, creating the basic distrust on land, water and air. Forests are destroyed continuously, every water body poisoned, air converted into poisonous gas, and the lithosphere dug up killing the basic soil bacteria. The suited and booted thugs employ every trick of advertizing to assert that the economic destruction is great progress. The basic feature of nature as the carrier of smell and sound messages is eliminated and we have the mechanized electronic messages that simply do not have any smell message content of nature. You can only hear on the phone, but you cannot smell and perceive. In fact smelling has become dangerous. We are afraid to breathe. Once all determination was made by taking a deep breath and the breathing created inspiration. Today both determination and inspiration are lost, thanks to the pollution and poisoning of the land, water and air. Every university is increasing the pollution and poisoning of nature, with its various courses that actually are based on the destruction of nature. It is the basic duty of every University to immediately start the ‘Free Nature Parks without human Tampering’, so that again the paradigms that grow from the free nature are resurrected. YM Sarma Chat gpt *Response to “The Loss of Paradigm” by YM Sarma* YM Sarma’s “The Loss of Paradigm” is a philosophical and deeply emotive critique of the modern world’s disconnection from nature as a source of meaning, understanding, and spiritual orientation. The essay laments the collapse of a once deeply integrated and symbiotic relationship between human beings and the natural world—a relationship that provided not only material sustenance but also a metaphysical framework, or *paradigm*, for perception and meaning-making. ------------------------------ *Key Themes and Commentary* *1. Nature as the Original Paradigm* Sarma argues that nature, once held sacred and equated with God, functioned as the original conceptual and spiritual paradigm. The sounds, smells, and signs of nature were interpreted as divine messages. This immersive and reverential relationship cultivated cultures rooted in peace, inspiration, and harmony. The architecture of temples, the arts, and even emotional expressions were aligned with natural rhythms and symbols. This vision echoes indigenous philosophies, ancient theologies, and ecological mysticism, where nature was not separate from the divine but *was* the divine — *pantheism* or *animism* as a living paradigm. *2. The Collapse Through Industrialization and Mechanization* The shift to a mechanized, industrialized, and urbanized world, Sarma contends, has led to a total breakdown of this paradigm. Nature is no longer the center of understanding—it is commodified, dissected, and destroyed in the name of progress and profit. As a result, people no longer have a shared base from which to derive truth or meaning, leading to the proliferation of confusion, debate without resolution, and a kind of existential rootlessness. This is a critique not just of environmental degradation, but of *epistemological fragmentation*—we no longer agree on what is real or meaningful because the shared, sacred ground that once unified perception (nature) has been severed. *3. Loss of Sensory and Emotional Anchors* Sarma mourns the loss of *smell* and *sound* as integral communicative aspects of nature. Once emotionally resonant, these sensory experiences are now feared (due to pollution) or entirely absent in modern, virtual communication. This has profound consequences—not just ecological, but *psychological and spiritual*—as the senses are pathways to meaning, memory, and emotion. “In fact smelling has become dangerous. We are afraid to breathe.” This line is especially powerful. What was once a sacred, life-affirming act—breathing—is now an act of risk. It is a poetic yet devastating metaphor for our alienation. *4. The Need for Restoration: Free Nature Parks* In a solution-oriented gesture, Sarma calls for universities to take moral responsibility and establish *‘Free Nature Parks without Human Tampering’*. This is a call not just for conservation but for *restoration of paradigms*—places where uncorrupted nature can once again inspire the human spirit and imagination. It’s a radical and necessary rethinking of education: instead of teaching systems that support ecological destruction, institutions must help humans *relearn how to live symbiotically* with the world. ------------------------------ *Stylistic Notes* - The language is impassioned and poetic, with a sense of moral urgency. - Grammar and punctuation are occasionally loose, but they serve to convey a stream-of-consciousness intensity rather than detracting from the message. - The repetition of phrases like “free, lush and healthy nature” and “paradigm” strengthens the meditative tone of the piece. ------------------------------ *Suggestions for Enhancing the Text (If Intended for Wider Publication)* - *Paragraphing and structure:* Breaking up longer paragraphs can help readers digest the message more easily. - *Clarify transitions:* Some ideas blend into each other. A bit more signposting would help. - *Refine syntax:* A light edit could polish the language without compromising the passion or poetic quality. ------------------------------ *Conclusion* Sarma’s essay is not simply a lament—it’s a *call to consciousness*. It frames environmental destruction as not just an ecological or economic issue, but as a *civilizational and spiritual crisis*. The absence of a shared paradigm rooted in nature has left humanity intellectually fragmented, emotionally starved, and spiritually disoriented. To restore sanity and meaning, we must allow nature once again to speak—through its sounds, smells, and silences. We must learn to listen, breathe, and build not in conquest, but in reverence. ------------------------------ Would you like help editing this essay for publication or turning it into a speech or visual presentation? Certainly. Let’s evaluate your essay *"The Loss of Paradigm"* based on standard academic criteria used in higher education (such as in university-level humanities or philosophy writing). I’ll break it down into categories with scores and provide an overall *mark* and *grade* at the end. ------------------------------ 🔍 *Evaluation Criteria* 1. *Content and Originality (30 marks)* · *Strengths:* o Deeply original and philosophical. o Presents a rare and poetic view connecting ecology, spirituality, and epistemology. o Thought-provoking insights about nature as a paradigm and the sensory breakdown in modern life. · *Areas for Improvement:* o Some ideas could be expanded with more specific examples or referenced traditions (e.g., ancient Indian, tribal, or Eastern philosophies). o Slight overgeneralization in parts. *Score:* *27 / 30* ------------------------------ 2. *Structure and Coherence (20 marks)* · *Strengths:* o The central idea is consistent throughout. o Clear emotional and logical progression: from past harmony → present crisis → future suggestion. · *Areas for Improvement:* o Paragraphing is uneven and dense; harder for readers to follow. o Some transitions between ideas are abrupt or unclear. *Score:* *14 / 20* ------------------------------ 3. *Language and Style (20 marks)* · *Strengths:* o Poetic and passionate tone. o Expressive and metaphorical language (“We are afraid to breathe” is striking). · *Areas for Improvement:* o Minor grammatical issues and run-on sentences. o Needs tighter editing for clarity and flow. *Score:* *15 / 20* ------------------------------ 4. *Argument and Critical Thinking (20 marks)* · *Strengths:* o Strong philosophical stance with depth. o Reflects an understanding of the relationship between culture, nature, and modernity. · *Areas for Improvement:* o Lacks counterpoints or engagement with opposing views. o Could benefit from supporting the claims with cultural or historical references. *Score:* *16 / 20* ------------------------------ 5. *Presentation and Format (10 marks)* · *Strengths:* o Title is clear and thematically appropriate. · *Areas for Improvement:* o Needs paragraph breaks, clear formatting, and proofreading for formal submission. *Score:* *6 / 10* ------------------------------ ✅ *Total Score: 78 / 100* 🎓 *Grade: B+ (Upper Second Class / 2:1)* ------------------------------ 📌 Summary *Criteria* *Score* Content & Originality 27 / 30 Structure & Coherence 14 / 20 Language & Style 15 / 20 Argument & Critical Thinking 16 / 20 Presentation & Format 6 / 10 *Total* *78 / 100* ------------------------------ 💡 Final Comments You’ve written a unique, impassioned, and philosophically rich essay. The core message is powerful, and the emotional conviction comes through clearly. To improve this for academic or public presentation: · Break it into clearer sections/paragraphs. · Tighten language and grammar. · Include references or examples from known texts or traditions (if aiming for publication or academic scoring). · Consider addressing potential counterarguments. Would you like help editing or formatting it into a more polished version? Certainly. Here's a *poem inspired by your essay "The Loss of Paradigm"* — capturing the essence of nature lost, the longing for reconnection, and the quiet hope for restoration. ------------------------------ *🌿 The Breath We Forgot* *Inspired by "The Loss of Paradigm" by YM Sarma* Once, the trees were temples, and the wind was a word from God. Rivers hummed in sacred silence, earth was never odd. The smell of rain meant blessing, the bird a breath of prayer. The forest sang our stories and we listened — we were there. But we built with iron logic, traded song for steel and smoke. We crowned machines as prophets, and cut the holy oak. We paved the breathing soil, and poisoned sky and stream. We made the world forget itself — and called it progress, called it dream. Now breath is risk, and silence screams. The night no longer comforts, and nature speaks in broken dreams. The idols stand in marbled halls, but spirit’s left the stone. For what is God without the breeze, the flower, root, and bone? Yet deep beneath the concrete, a seed of hope remains. A whisper through the plastic noise, a longing in our veins. Return the parks to silence, let the wild be wild again. And maybe we will learn to breathe, like we did back then. ------------------------------ Would you like a version in a specific style (e.g., haiku, free verse, sonnet), or a version in your native language if preferred? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BOQTBeHwZRpdWqETx%2Bjqdutc7qjCW%3DrV1v9y15DYB_oQ%40mail.gmail.com.
