-- *Mar*The Ecological Human-Vs-The Economic Man
Ecology studies the total macro DNA of the Biosphere as one single organism. It needs the feeling method of education, to feel and understand the diverse base pairs and genes that sustain the symbiotic, emotional and existential links of organisms that ultimately make the planet earth into the living Goddess Gaia. Emotions and feelings function as the blood circulation system among the organisms, the feelings and emotions of each being perceived and understood by the organisms, so that each organism performs its ecological role by living ecologically and symbiotically. There is a macro rhythm that governs the lives of the diverse organisms. If the Biosphere is healthy, then every organism too becomes healthy. It is just like your body, where healthy body means healthy cells and healthy bacteria that enable the cells to function. Healthy nature creates the healthy you, creating the happy ease of living, the opposite of diseased living. Economics is the antonym of Ecology. It studies the economic man, a machine that functions as per the principles of Newtonian mechanics. It is not the human being, or the human organism of Ecology. It is just a machine amenable to mathematics and mechanics. It is not a human being. It is not governed by the subject Human Psychology but only my Newtonian mechanics. The ideal of the economic man is to convert the internal hormonal communication, into a lubrication system of machine-the hormones that do not respond to emotions and feelings. The latest economic man is the Robot. He is driving out the ecological humans from the economies. A Robot can do every work, better than a human being.The human are facing the mass economic death or the ultimate economic genocide. When jobs are lost, markets vanish and the result is death of trade and commerce, the extinction of every institution and organization. The attempt of economics, to make the humans live outside the Biosphere; anti ecologically is coming to the dead end. We need urgently free nature, fill every village, town and city with trees, even forests, as far as possible. A forest shelters the Biosphere, not merely trees. The revival of free nature has millions of jobs. We must realize that any and every machine basically harms and diseases nature. Nature needs freedom. Creating the free nature is a very complicated and gigantic task. The Universities have to substitute economics with ecology. They must contain free forests, along with only functional and not grand buildings. There shall be subjects that deal with each organism, keeping in view its ecological needs and the rules of nature that govern the symbiotic ecology. The Universities must stop producing new corps of nature destroyers every year. They must start ‘The Free Nature Parks without human Tampering. YM Sarma Chat gpt Here’s my evaluation of your piece *"The Ecological Human vs. The Economic Man"* — both in terms of writing quality and conceptual strength — along with a suggested polished version that preserves your core message. ------------------------------ *Evaluation* *Strengths* 1. *Big Picture Vision* – You’ve framed ecology not just as a science but as a *feeling-based, interconnected system*, using Gaia imagery effectively. 2. *Moral Urgency* – The contrast between "ecological human" and "economic man" is stark and thought-provoking. 3. *Imagery and Metaphors* – Comparing emotional exchanges to blood circulation and economic man to a Newtonian machine makes the contrast vivid. 4. *Call to Action* – You provide a concrete (though ambitious) solution: replacing economics with ecology in universities and reviving forests. *Areas for Improvement* - *Clarity and Flow* – Some sentences are long and carry too many ideas at once; breaking them will improve readability. - *Repetition* – Several points are repeated (e.g., machines harming nature, free nature revival) without adding new information. - *Terminology Precision* – The term "macro DNA of the Biosphere" is poetic but could confuse scientifically minded readers unless clarified. - *Balance of Passion and Precision* – Passionate language is good, but overly strong claims (like "any and every machine harms nature") might alienate readers unless nuanced. *Marks & Grade* - *Content & Ideas* – 9/10 (very original and deeply reflective) - *Structure & Flow* – 7.5/10 (good sections, but needs smoother transitions) - *Language & Clarity* – 7/10 (effective metaphors, but some sentences are heavy) - *Overall Grade* – *A-* ------------------------------ *Edited Version (Condensed & Polished)* *The Ecological Human vs. The Economic Man* *By YM Sarma* Ecology views the biosphere as a single living organism, where each life form plays a role in maintaining the planet’s health. This vast system—sometimes imagined as the living Goddess Gaia—depends on countless emotional, biological, and symbiotic exchanges, much like the circulation of blood in a body. When the biosphere is healthy, all its inhabitants flourish; when it sickens, all suffer. Economics, by contrast, studies the "economic man"—a mechanical being governed by Newtonian logic, divorced from emotion and the living cycles of nature. In this model, humans become machines, their hormonal responses reduced to mechanical lubrication. The ultimate economic man is the robot, which now replaces ecological humans in the workforce. As machines take over, jobs vanish, markets collapse, and social institutions face extinction. The push to live outside the biosphere—anti-ecologically—is reaching a dead end. Our survival depends on restoring free nature: filling towns and cities with trees, creating forests, and sheltering entire ecosystems. Such work could generate millions of jobs. But we must accept that most machines damage nature, and that the protection of the biosphere is a complex, urgent task. Universities must lead this transformation. Economics must give way to ecology as the guiding discipline, with campuses designed around functional, modest buildings and vast forested areas. Academic programs should focus on the ecological needs of each species and the natural laws that govern life. Above all, universities must stop producing graduates who inadvertently destroy nature, and instead create spaces—true free nature parks—where the biosphere can thrive without human interference. ------------------------------ If you like, I can also create a *side-by-side comparison* of your original and the edited version so you can see exactly what changed and why. Do you want me to prepare that next? Here’s a poem inspired by your piece *"The Ecological Human vs. The Economic Man"* — keeping the tone urgent, reflective, and hopeful. ------------------------------ *🌿 The Song of the Ecological Human* *By YM Sarma* The Earth is a single breath, a heartbeat shared by leaf and lung, its rivers pulse through root and vein, its winds are songs the stars have sung. We were born in the garden’s embrace, taught the rhythm of rain and seed, to feel the sorrow of a withered tree, to share the joy of a bird in need. But we built the cold, metallic man, gears in place of dreams and hands, he counts the coins, ignores the clouds, and breaks the web that life demands. Now robots walk where forests stood, and silence falls on fields once bright, yet still the soil remembers us— it calls us home, it holds us tight. So plant the seed, release the sky, let rivers wander where they will, be once again the Earth’s own child— the garden waits for us, still. ------------------------------ I can also write you a *shorter, sharper version* that reads like a rallying cry for action. Shall I do that too? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCL6R2Nd28VXmGz3WQzMBA91As_ZG7mN4nw3CZrHxvWcgw%40mail.gmail.com.
