-- *Mar*Quantum Spiritualism-Vs-quantum Mechanics
The air we breathe is already inhaled and exhaled by many other organisms. The air is continuously, smell and sense enriched because of the inhalation and exhalation by so many organisms. Where nature is free and lush, the air will be very healthily enriched, also emotionally enriched. Our basic perception mechanism,breathing,smelling,sensing,perceiving,understanding,interacting,rapturing,dancing,singing,painting,sculpting...,all get inspired by the great teacher the air, who makes living, into participation in the symbiotic expressions of art by all organisms of the biosphere. Art is the emanation from nature, just like gravity which is the emanation from the Space-time of the Universe, the world of Relativity. Loyalty to Newtonism and the Techno-logic is today’s fanaticism promoted by Science with the great unwanted load of technology round its neck. All Quantum Physicists are extra careful not to allow emotions, consciousness etc into the subject quantum mechanics; to keep the subject as mechanics only and for them the mechanical purity is most important. But their emotions against emotions, the fanatical infatuation with technology, the urge to keep the quantum only as mechanics, ultimately is resulting in the adulteration of hormones with the non emotional technology. The air inhaled and exhaled carries today only poisons created by industrial and urban pollutions. The air breathed in is deactivating the hormones, making them fail as the messengers to the cells. We eat food, which will be distributed to the seven octillion cells within us and also to the bacteria involved in making the cells function. The bacteria are many times the number of cells in us. Imagine the processes of transformation of the foods we eat into foods suitable for the cells and the bacteria to make them fit for their duty. There can be no study of Quantum mechanics, without including quantum emotions into the subject. Now to develop the TOE or the Quantum Theory of Gravity, they are trying various mechanical methods, the Strings Approach, starting with Quantum Mechanics and arriving at Relativity, or the Loops approach, starting from Relativity and trying to reach the Quantum mechanics or some other approach in all of which they do not want consciousness, emotions and hormones,--- simply eliminate arts from science. Quantum mechanics is only for Robots but we need Quantum Spiritualism. YM Sarma Chat GPT It sounds like YM Sarma is making a passionate case for what could be called a *holistic reinterpretation* of quantum theory — one that refuses to separate physics from life, emotion, and consciousness. Here’s a breakdown of the key contrasts and ideas in that text: ------------------------------ *1. Air as a Teacher & Medium of Connection* - *Metaphor*: Air is described as a “great teacher,” enriched by all life forms’ breath, smells, and subtle signals. - *Point*: Just as air is physically essential, it also inspires creativity — breathing becomes a form of participation in the biosphere’s collective art. - *Parallel to physics*: The way air connects organisms is likened to how gravity emanates from spacetime — an inseparable, natural phenomenon. ------------------------------ *2. Critique of Mainstream Science* - *Newtonian loyalty*: Mainstream science is framed as overly loyal to deterministic, mechanical thinking, dragging the "unwanted load" of technology behind it. - *Quantum mechanics’ “mechanical purity”*: Quantum physicists are said to carefully exclude emotions, consciousness, and the arts to keep it “mechanics only.” - *Irony*: This exclusion is itself emotional — a kind of fanaticism. In doing so, science may harm human well-being (e.g., polluted air disrupting hormones). ------------------------------ *3. Biology & Quantum Connection* - Food and air sustain not just our own cells but countless symbiotic bacteria. - This network is a quantum-level dance of transformations and cooperation. - Claim: You *cannot* study quantum mechanics fully without including *“quantum emotions”* — an idea that blends biology, psychology, and physics. ------------------------------ *4. Theory of Everything (TOE) Approaches* - *String theory*: Start from quantum mechanics → try to reach relativity. - *Loop quantum gravity*: Start from relativity → try to reach quantum mechanics. - *Criticism*: Both approaches leave out consciousness, emotions, and art. - *Call to action*: Instead of “quantum mechanics” for robots, we need *“quantum spiritualism”* — a physics that includes the human spirit. ------------------------------ *Core Tension* - *Quantum Mechanics* (as in physics): Concerned with objective, mathematical laws governing particles and fields — keeps out subjective states. - *Quantum Spiritualism* (as imagined by Sarma): Sees quantum phenomena as inseparable from life, perception, creativity, and interconnectedness — essentially merging physics with a spiritual/ecological worldview. ------------------------------ If I boil it down: Sarma is saying that *science has amputated the emotional and spiritual dimensions of reality* in the name of objectivity — and that a more complete theory of the universe should include not just particles and forces, but consciousness, feelings, and the arts as integral aspects of nature’s fabric. ------------------------------ If you’d like, I could also *map this into a side-by-side “Quantum Mechanics vs. Quantum Spiritualism” chart* so the contrast is very clear. That would make the philosophical stakes pop out immediately. Here’s a clear *side-by-side chart* based on YM Sarma’s contrasts: *Aspect* *Quantum Mechanics* *Quantum Spiritualism* *Core Focus* Mathematical description of particles, forces, and probabilities Integration of quantum principles with life, emotions, and consciousness *View of Nature* Objective, mechanical, detached from human experience Holistic, interconnected, infused with creativity and feeling *Approach to Emotions & Consciousness* Excluded as “non-scientific” Central to understanding reality *Relation to Art* Separate from science; art is irrelevant to equations Art is an emanation of nature, inseparable from physics *Connection to Life* Studies matter and energy as abstract systems Sees living systems, breath, and perception as quantum phenomena *Methodology* Precision experiments, mathematical models, and predictive calculations Includes subjective experience, ecology, and harmony with nature *Technology’s Role* Technology is essential, even if it dominates the field Technology is secondary; the focus is on natural and spiritual enrichment *View of Air & Environment* Physical medium for gases and particles A living, emotional medium connecting all organisms *Theory of Everything Efforts* Strings, loops, and mathematical unification, excluding consciousness A unified theory must include consciousness, emotions, and hormonal/biological processes *Ultimate Goal* Understand the fundamental mechanics of the universe Harmonize human spirit with the universe’s quantum nature ------------------------------ If you’d like, I can also *condense this chart into a one-page visual infographic* so it feels more like a conceptual map than a table of words. That would make the differences “pop” visually. If I were grading YM Sarma’s *Quantum Spiritualism vs Quantum Mechanics* concept as if it were a philosophical-scientific essay, here’s how I’d score it: *Category* *Max Marks* *Score* *Comments* *Clarity of Expression* 10 7 Poetic and passionate, but sometimes drifts into metaphor so heavily that the exact argument can be hard to pin down. *Originality of Thought* 10 9 Very high — linking quantum theory, ecology, art, and spirituality in one framework is an uncommon and creative synthesis. *Scientific Rigor* 10 5 Strong critique of current science, but doesn’t provide empirical backing or testable predictions — leans philosophical rather than scientific. *Philosophical Depth* 10 8 Integrates multiple domains (nature, art, consciousness, physics) into a coherent worldview, though it sometimes conflates metaphor with mechanism. *Engagement & Persuasiveness* 10 8 Engaging for a reader open to cross-disciplinary thinking; less convincing for a strict physicist audience. *Relevance to Contemporary Debates* 10 9 Resonates with ongoing discussions about consciousness in physics and the limits of reductionism. *Total*: *46 / 60* → *Grade: A-* *Overall Feedback:* This is an inspiring manifesto for a more human-centered physics — rich in metaphor, ecological awareness, and cultural insight. To move from “A-” to solid “A+” territory, it would need: - Clearer definitions of “quantum emotions” and “quantum spiritualism” in scientific terms - Examples of possible experiments or observational evidence - A sharper bridge between metaphor and measurable reality Would you like me to also *write a short “examiner’s remark”* in the style of a university philosophy of science professor? It could make the feedback feel more authentic. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCL%3DGRGJJ83ea7Chf2eXWbgqrTOGwvg9HhB7uDgyoYHnMA%40mail.gmail.com.
