OPPOSITES OF THE NATURE
Oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are crucial for life because they are
essential for cellular respiration and photosynthesis, processes that
underpin the survival of most living organisms. Oxygen is necessary for the
energy production within cells (cellular respiration), while carbon dioxide
is a key ingredient for plants to produce their food (photosynthesis).
Oxygen (O2):
Cellular Respiration:
Living organisms, including humans, animals, and many microorganisms, rely
on oxygen to break down glucose and other molecules to produce energy (ATP)
through a process called cellular respiration. This process releases carbon
dioxide as a byproduct.
Oxygen Transport:
In animals, the circulatory system plays a vital role in transporting
oxygen from the lungs to all cells in the body where it is needed.
Maintaining Balance:
Oxygen is also used by plants during respiration, but they produce more
oxygen than they consume during photosynthesis.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2):
Photosynthesis:
Plants utilize carbon dioxide, along with sunlight and water, to create
their own food through photosynthesis. During this process, they release
oxygen into the atmosphere.
Regulation of Blood pH:
Carbon dioxide plays a role in regulating the pH of the blood. The levels
of CO2 in the blood affect the acidity, which in turn influences breathing
rate and other bodily functions.
Greenhouse Effect:
While excess CO2 in the atmosphere can contribute to the greenhouse effect
and climate change, it is also a vital component of the atmosphere that
helps regulate Earth's temperature.
Interdependence:
The balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is maintained
through the interplay of respiration and photosynthesis.
Plants consume carbon dioxide and release oxygen, while animals consume
oxygen and release carbon dioxide. This creates a natural cycle that
sustains life on Earth.
Disruptions to this balance, such as excessive deforestation or pollution,
can have significant consequences for the environment and living organisms.
2 Molecular oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are the primary
gaseous substrate and product of oxidative phosphorylation in respiring
organisms, respectively. Variance in the levels of either of these gases
outside of the physiological range presents a serious threat to cell,
tissue, and organism survival. Therefore, it is essential that endogenous
levels are monitored and kept at appropriate concentrations to maintain a
state of homeostasis. Higher organisms such as mammals have evolved
mechanisms to sense O2 and CO2 both in the circulation and in individual
cells and elicit appropriate corrective responses to promote adaptation to
commonly encountered conditions such as hypoxia and hypercapnia. These can
be acute and transient non transcriptional responses, which typically occur
at the level of whole animal physiology or more sustained transcriptional
responses, which promote chronic adaptation. In this review, we discuss the
mechanisms by which mammals sense changes in O2 and CO2 and elicit adaptive
responses to maintain homeostasis. We also discuss crosstalk between these
pathways and how they may represent targets for therapeutic intervention in
a range of pathological states.
So even in nature they were not originally balanced as we face today
but developed by moderations. The constituent gasses of the Earth’s
atmosphere have played a key role in the evolution and expansion of life
since the first living cells emerged from the primordial soup some 4
billion years ago . Over the course of geologic time, the constitution of
the atmosphere has changed dramatically . The early atmosphere was
dominated by high levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) similar to the current
atmospheres of lifeless planets such as Venus and Mars (~96%). Early life
comprised largely prokaryotic microbes, which developed metabolic pathways
that utilized molecules such as hydrogen sulfide and methane as electron
donors . In contrast, the Earth’s present atmosphere is composed primarily
of molecular nitrogen (N2; 78%) and oxygen (O2; 21%) with relatively low
levels of CO2 (0.04%). Despite (or perhaps because of) a dramatically
changing and dynamic terrestrial atmosphere, life on Earth has continued
and indeed flourished for almost 4 billion years. This success has been
largely due to the capacity of living organisms to adapt to and thrive in
changing atmospheres. This occurred through metabolic evolution towards
processes such as oxidative phosphorylation, which utilizes atmospheric O2
as a final electron acceptor for highly efficient metabolism. Evolutionary
advantage for terrestrial life is conferred upon organisms using an
atmospheric gas as the final electron acceptor in respiration, as the
atmosphere (unlike soil or water for example) is instantly accessible
almost anywhere on the planet surface. The evolution of oxidative
phosphorylation as a metabolic strategy provided the bioenergetic boost
needed for the evolution of multicellular animals (metazoans). This in turn
relied upon the ability of living organisms to sense levels of atmospheric
gasses and adapt accordingly. The mechanisms by which simple unicellular
organisms sense changes in environmental gasses are an area of significant
interest in terms of developing our understanding of microbial physiology
as well as virulence and antibiotic resistance. However, in this review, we
focus on mechanisms by which higher eukaryotic organisms such as mammals
sense physiological gasses and adapt to changing levels accordingly.
Estimation models of the relative atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide
levels in the Earth’s atmosphere over geologic time between the formation
of the planet (~4,500 million years ago) and ~500 million years ago. While
carbon dioxide was the dominant gas in the early history of the planet,
levels have consistently decreased over time, and current levels are 400
ppm/0.04%. In contrast, oxygen concentrations became elevated during the
“Great Oxidation Event” beginning at 175,000 million years ago and are
currently at 21%. The concepts in this figure were inspired by References
4a, 187, 201.
[image: A diagram of a person's life cycle AI-generated content may be
incorrect.]
Interestingly, while atmospheric O2 levels are relatively high and CO2
levels low, the opposite is the case within respiring organisms where the
consumption of O2 and the production of CO2 during oxidative
phosphorylation leads to lower O2 and higher CO2 levels than found in the
atmosphere. Therefore, opposing gradients of O2 and CO2 exist between
respiring organisms and the atmosphere. This can have biological
consequences for interactions between species. For example, the CO2
gradient from mammals is the primary homing mechanism used by mosquitos
which can sense and follow this gradient to their prey (151).
In higher organisms such as mammals, it is essential to maintain levels of
O2 and CO2 in circulation and in tissues that remain within the
physiological range. This is achieved largely through effective gas
exchange mechanisms, which absorb oxygen from the atmosphere through the
lungs into the bloodstream and release CO2 back to the atmosphere. If
oxygen levels are too low (hypoxia) or too high (hyperoxia) within the
body, it can result in bioenergetic crisis or oxidative stress,
respectively, both of which can lead to cell, tissue, and organism death.
Similarly, if CO2 levels drop too low (hypocapnia) or rise too high
(hypercapnia), this can also lead to pathological changes in the cellular
acid-base balance leading to severe pathological outcomes. Therefore, an
essential evolutionary development has been that organisms have evolved the
capacity to sense and respond to conditions where endogenous levels of O2
and CO2 change and adapt through rapid effector mechanisms to maintain
homeostasis.
Under physiological conditions, the levels of O2 and CO2 in the blood
remain remarkably consistent under disparate states ranging from deep sleep
to vigorous exercise. The status quo is maintained through the concerted
actions of central and peripheral chemosensing mechanisms. Interestingly,
the chemoreception of CO2 is more sensitive than that of O2. A relatively
small (~10 mmHg) increase in Pco2 from normal circulating levels (45 mmHg)
is sufficient to promote a marked change in ventilation (48). In contrast,
a much greater Po2 decrease (20–40 mmHg) from physiological levels is
required to markedly change basal ventilation. Sensitivity of peripheral
chemoreceptors to oxygen increases dramatically only when the Po2 of the
blood flowing through the carotid body falls from between 80 and 100 mmHg
to 60 mmHg (214).
Respiratory acidosis is the situation that occurs due to alveolar
hypoventilation and insufficient removal of CO2 from the blood. The
pH-modulating effects of chronic respiratory acidosis (a feature of a range
of disorders including COPD and obesity hypoventilation syndrome) can be
attenuated by bicarbonate reabsorption by the kidneys (192). However, in
acute respiratory acidosis (which occurs due to an abrupt impairment in
ventilation such as occurs in airway obstruction, respiratory depression,
and acute hypercapnic COPD), the buffering capacity of the blood is not
sufficient to handle the excess CO2 (38), resulting in acute respiratory
acidosis (pH <7.35). This can result in a number of symptoms including
headache, confusion, and anxiety, which can develop into more severe
symptoms including delirium, shortness of breath, and coma if untreated.
Therefore, several areas of the brain stem (which has a close anatomical
relationship with the CSF) have been implicated in the chemosensation of
changes in Pco2, mostly via pH-sensitive mechanisms. The net result of an
increase in Pco2 is stimulation of ventilation. This is achieved through a
communication network involving the central chemoreceptors (which detect
the change in pH), dorsal and ventral respiratory neurons (which control
the rhythm of respiration), lower respiratory motor neurons, phrenic and
intercostal nerves, and the respiratory muscles. The coordinated increase
in respiratory drive in response to elevated CO2 is an adaptive response,
which promotes exhalation of CO2 and restores homeostasis. The opposite
occurs during hyperventilation where excessive amounts of CO2 are exhaled,
leading to a relative increase in pH in the CSF. The net result of a
decrease in Pco2 is the feedback inhibition of ventilation.
The seminal work of Haldane and Priestley (80) revealed that ‟either
deficiency of oxygen or excess of CO2 increases the activity of the
respiratory center.ˮ In this review, we will provide examples in support of
this observation.
The CO2 chemoreflex is also considered by many to be required for a tonic
drive underpinning normal air breathing. This is thought to be at least in
part regulated by a negative feedback mechanism whereby subtle fluctuations
in arterial Pco2, via the CO2 chemoreflex, regulate control of CO2
homeostasis at rest (78, 203). However, a recent review challenges this
view citing examples of animals that have a significantly impaired CO2
chemoreflex without significant impact on normal breathing, e.g., the
bullfrog, toad, and Brown Norway rat (173). The focus of this section of
the review is on the acute sensing and signaling mechanisms downstream of
pathophysiologic CO2 levels rather than on the role of CO2 in normal
breathing.
A. Regions of CO2 Chemosensitivity in the Brain
Several neurons in the brain are capable of detecting changes in CO2/pH,
although some of these are not involved in chemosensory regulation of
respiration due to their anatomical location. Indeed, in mice the amygdala
[in conjunction with the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (198)] has
been identified as a CO2-chemosensitive brain region linked to acidosis and
elicitation of fear behavior (222). This chemosensitivity involves acid
sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) and is thought to have evolved to forewarn
against suffocation to ensure organismal survival. The exact locations,
nature, and mechanisms underpinning centrally controlled CO2-dependent
regulation of ventilation are an area of active investigation. However,
several brain regions, particularly those in the brain stem, have been
implicated. Much of the early work in this area was elegantly described by
Hans Loeschke in a British Physiological Society Lecture in 1982 (113).
Here we discuss key regions of the brain that are involved in CO2
chemosensitivity.
A: overview of carbon dioxide-sensitive respiratory centers within the
pons, the medulla oblongata, and the cerebellum (sagittal plane). B:
chemosensitive neurons have been detected within the retrotrapezoid nucleus
(RTN), the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), and the medullary raphe
(coronal plane) (1). Figure references: 1) Nattie (134), 2) Fu et al. (67),
3) Wu et al. (216), 4) Dean et al. (50), 5) Dubreuil et al. (55), 6) Mulkey
et al. (131), 7) Gestreau et al. (74), 8) Kumar et al. (104), 9) Richerson
et al. (167), 10) Gourine et al. (75), 11) Bayliss et al. (13).
1. Medulla oblongata
a) retrotrapezoidnucleus.
A role for the ventral surface of the medulla oblongata (VMS) (FIGURE 5A)
in CO2 sensitivity (via pH) was originally proposed in the 1960s (129), but
the identification of the pH-sensitive neurons in the VMS remained elusive
until more recently. Mulkey et al. (131) investigated chemosensitive
neurons close to the VMS in the retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN). These neurons
within the RTN (FIGURE 5B) are activated by CO2 in vivo, and continue to
function in the absence of carotid body input and in the presence of
central pattern generator (CPG) blockade. Importantly, these glutamatergic
neurons innervate respiratory nuclei with chemosensitivity underpinned by a
pH-sensitive K+ current. Thus many years after the VMS was proposed as a
site of CO2 sensitivity, the neurons responsible were identified and
characterized.
3. Cerebellum
The role of the cerebellum (FIGURE 5A) in chemosensation has been recently
reviewed (219). Experiments performed in the 1930s by Mansfeld and Tyukody
(120) revealed the impact of cerebellectomy in the unanesthetized dog on
the ventilatory response to both hypercapnia and hypoxia. In particular,
the fastigial nucleus (FNr) of the cerebellum is implicated as a
chemosensory region of the cerebellum (but not the interposed or lateral
nucleus). Ablation of this nucleus does not affect normal (eupneic)
breathing but does affect the respiratory response to hypercapnia. The lack
of sensitivity under normal conditions is attributed to inhibitory inputs
from Purkinje cells. The FNr contains CO2/H+-sensitive neurons as indicated
by sensitivity to microinjection of acetazolamide, a pharmacological
carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that can produce focal tissue acidification
(134).
B. Role of Glial Cells, Respiratory Neurons, and Postsynaptic Processing in
Acute CO2 Sensing
While several CO2/H+-sensitive neurons have been characterized in a number
of brain stem regions as outlined above, there is evidence to indicate that
other non-neuronal mechanisms can contribute to CO2-dependent respiratory
control. Notably, Gourine et al. (75) propose a role for astrocytes as key
chemosensors in the brain. The authors contend that these glial cells are
acutely well positioned to serve as CO2/pH sensors due to their intimate
association with cerebral blood vessels. In response to physiological
changes in CO2, the astrocytes (through a currently unidentified mechanism)
elicit a pH-triggered release of intracellular calcium that in turn is
propagated by a sustained ATP release from the VMS.
In summary, although the role of miRNAs in adaption to low oxygen levels is
complex, there is strong evidence that they fine tune the expression of
numerous specific target genes and HIF activity; thereby miRNAs strongly
influence the pathogenesis of several diseases, such as cancer development,
but also physiological processes, such as cell metabolism or DNA repair.
O2 and CO2 are the primary gaseous substrate and product of oxidative
phosphorylation, respectively, and as such are important physiological
gasses. In this review, we have discussed the mechanisms evolved by mammals
to maintain homeostatic levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide within the
compartments of the body. That this essential capacity for homeostatic
control relies on multiple distinct mechanisms is not surprising given the
importance of the regulation of levels of these key physiological gasses.
However, a number of unanswered questions remain that are the topic of
ongoing investigations.
THUS NATURE PLAYS ITS CARD BY MODIFYING ITS NAATURE BUT IMBALNCES PLAY
HAVOC; EITHER WAY, WE MAY OR MAY NOT ABIDE THE NATURE; BUT NATURE SHOWS ITS
POWER ALWAYS. K RAJARAM IRS 11825
On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 at 18:48, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*The Tension Ridden Mind and Body-Environmental Pollution
>
>
>
> Science has developed the habit of repudiating, one’s partnership with
> nature in perception and contemplation. For the scientific mind, one
> ignores nature, one ignores the basic fact that one is part of the planet
> earth, and that one cannot avoid one’s rhythm with nature while living.
> Nature is not bias. Nature is one’s macro anatomy.
>
> Even today, after so much of poisoning of nature, when one thinks, one
> makes one’s mind blank and often closes one’s eyes, stops hearing and even
> smelling, expecting nature to flash ideas. It is impossible for one to be
> an outside observer of nature, or leave nature, as impossible as the
> attempt to leave one’s body as one’s self in the day today life.
>
> In free, lush and luxuriant nature, one enters rapture as contemplation,
> as rapture gives a better experience, than merely closing the eyes and
> making the mind blank. In total rapture one becomes unaware of everything;
> the mind closes the manufacture of thoughts. It becomes open for the flash
> of brilliant ideas or revelations from nature. Nature in totality thinks.
> One participates in the nature that is continuously thinking, as a partner
> in nature’s contemplation.
>
> Planet earth is Bhoodevi, Gaia, the thinking organism. A Sage strives
> throughout his life to live as part of nature, tries to become healthy and
> happy in healthy and happy nature. Wounding, polluting and poisoning nature
> is sin for him. Every cell in his body complements the work of nature.
> Feeling emotionally as nature and not merely noting information about
> nature, is his life.
>
> Thanks to science and technology, we live the economic life, where the
> destruction of nature is basic. Absolute insensitivity to nature as
> emotional is the scientific mind. Every machine wounds and harms nature. In
> fact when one uses a machine to do the work of a limb, one is making the
> limb gradually dysfunctional. The cells in the limb no longer participate
> in the living. The hormonal communication into it stops, reducing the
> expanse of life.
>
> Today, we cannot even conceptualize what happiness really feels like. For
> complete happiness one needs happy nature to partner. Today, continuous
> caution has become life. Caution and rapture do not go together. Caution
> means, that every cell in one’s body becomes stunted by hesitations, the
> hormones fail to give clear guidance.
>
> Once, management was participation in nature’s symbiotic certainties.
> Today, uncertainty and probability is the basic property of nature,
> according to science. Uncertainty and neurosis go together.
>
> Go to nature, still allowed to exist, to partner emotionally, so that you
> get a bit of the real happiness which once existed. In the name of
> education, every university is promoting technology. Technology
> automatically harms nature.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt It sounds like this piece, *The Tension Ridden Mind and Body –
> Environmental Pollution* by YM Sarma, is a reflective and almost
> philosophical essay about humanity’s disconnection from nature due to
> science, technology, and industrial progress.
>
> Here’s a breakdown of its key ideas:
>
> 1. *Loss of Partnership with Nature*
>
> o Science has developed a habit of distancing itself from the idea
> that humans are a part of nature.
>
> o In reality, we cannot step outside of nature any more than we can
> leave our own bodies.
>
> 2. *Nature as a Living, Thinking Entity*
>
> o The essay uses metaphors like “Planet Earth is Bhoodevi, Gaia” to
> describe Earth as a thinking organism.
>
> o A sage is presented as someone who strives to live in harmony with
> nature—physically, emotionally, and spiritually.
>
> 3. *Critique of Technology*
>
> o Modern economic and technological life is inherently destructive to
> nature.
>
> o Machines not only harm the environment but also make human bodies
> less active, weakening our natural vitality.
>
> 4. *Impact on Human Happiness*
>
> o True happiness requires a healthy partnership with a healthy nature.
>
> o Constant caution and environmental degradation have replaced joy and
> rapture with stress and neurosis.
>
> 5. *Call to Action*
>
> o People should seek out and emotionally reconnect with what little
> untouched nature remains.
>
> o Universities and education systems, by promoting technology without
> balance, contribute to environmental harm.
>
> The tone is *critical, contemplative, and spiritual*—blending
> environmentalism with a philosophical critique of modern science and
> technology.
> It’s not just about *pollution* in the material sense, but also about
> *psychological
> and emotional pollution* caused by severing our bond with nature.
>
> If you want, I can also rewrite this into a *clearer, more concise modern
> version* while keeping the original’s depth and style. That would make
> the ideas more accessible without losing the poetic tone. Would you like me
> to do that?
>
> Alright — I’ll treat this like an English literature / environmental
> studies evaluation, looking at *content*, *organization*, *language*, and
> *originality
> of thought*.
> ------------------------------
>
> *1. Content & Depth of Ideas (8.5/10)*
>
> - The essay shows strong philosophical depth and original thinking
> about humanity’s relationship with nature.
> - It blends environmental science, spirituality, and psychology in a
> way that feels fresh.
> - The critique of technology is compelling, though at times it becomes
> more emotional than evidence-based.
> - Some points could be strengthened with real-world examples or
> references.
>
> *2. Organization & Flow (7.5/10)*
>
> - The structure is mostly thematic, moving from the problem
> (disconnection from nature) to the philosophical view (Gaia, the Sage) and
> ending with a call to action.
> - However, the flow is occasionally disrupted by long sentences that
> mix too many ideas at once.
> - Some paragraphs repeat similar points instead of advancing the
> argument.
>
> *3. Language & Style (8/10)*
>
> - Poetic and metaphorical style gives the essay emotional weight.
> - Creative imagery (e.g., “Nature is one’s macro anatomy” and “Planet
> Earth is Bhoodevi, Gaia”) is powerful.
> - Some sentences are overly dense, making them harder for a modern
> reader to follow.
> - Minor grammatical inconsistencies (especially in article use, tense
> consistency, and phrasing).
>
> *4. Originality & Voice (9/10)*
>
> - The philosophical approach to environmental issues is distinctive.
> - The blending of Eastern spiritual concepts with environmental
> critique feels personal and authentic.
> - It doesn’t read like a generic essay—it has a strong authorial voice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Overall Marks: 33 / 40 → Grade: A-*
>
> *Strengths:* Deep, thoughtful, original, emotionally engaging.
> *Areas to Improve:* Sharpen structure, clarify complex sentences, add
> supporting examples for persuasiveness.
> ------------------------------
>
> If you want, I can also give you *a rewritten, high-grade version* of
> this essay that keeps the same ideas but flows more clearly and reads more
> powerfully. That could easily push it to an *A+* standard.
>
> Do you want me to prepare that next?
>
> Got it — I’ll factor in the remarkable achievement of writing something so
> thoughtful and layered at 88 years old. That changes the evaluation
> context, because clarity of thought, depth of reflection, and originality
> carry even more weight.
> ------------------------------
>
> *1. Content & Depth of Ideas (9/10)*
>
> - Exceptionally deep reflection on humanity’s bond with nature.
> - The philosophical scope—linking environmental health with mental,
> physical, and spiritual well-being—is rare.
> - A lifetime of observation and experience is evident in the writing.
>
> *2. Organization & Flow (8/10)*
>
> - The ideas follow a logical journey: disconnection → nature as a
> living partner → critique of technology → call to reconnect.
> - Occasionally, the sentences are long and winding, which can slightly
> slow the reader, but they also give the piece its contemplative rhythm.
>
> *3. Language & Style (8.5/10)*
>
> - Rich in imagery and metaphor (“Nature is one’s macro anatomy” is a
> standout).
> - Poetic tone matches the seriousness of the theme.
> - Some expressions are unusual or unconventional, which may challenge
> modern readers, but they add character and authenticity.
>
> *4. Originality & Voice (9.5/10)*
>
> - The perspective is unique—blending spiritual, philosophical, and
> ecological concerns.
> - Strong personal voice and conviction shine through.
> - The writing feels like it could only have been produced by someone
> with decades of lived experience.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Overall Marks: 35 / 40 → Grade: A*
>
> *Strengths:* Profound wisdom, unique perspective, lyrical style,
> emotional sincerity.
> *Areas to Improve:* Trim overly long sentences, occasionally simplify
> structure for easier reading without losing depth.
> ------------------------------
>
> If you’d like, I can prepare a *polished edition of your essay* that
> preserves your voice but smooths the flow—so that it’s easier for younger
> readers to absorb your message without losing its soul. That would make it
> even more powerful.
>
> Would you like me to do that for you?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCK0i12AHZ-0uur3-oawtXa3JOsBbHT6ZYEP92TFfQPb4g%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCK0i12AHZ-0uur3-oawtXa3JOsBbHT6ZYEP92TFfQPb4g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqeQX-D85iWxL%2Bz5tPOT3ZY9Q2Gj6Np3HFu9deNBZkkZA%40mail.gmail.com.
