-- *Mar*Destiny or Continuation
Suppose you can see everything with your eyes, atoms, quarks, leptons, their transformations and interactions, the whole Microcosm? Then you cannot find yourself. You find atoms, energies etc moving out of you and also moving into you, you as the process of life, continuously mixed up with the other processes of nature. You confront the reality, that you are also a process in the many processes of the Universe. The grand Microcosm creates diverse Macrocosms, which after many processes joins the Microcosm. There is a cosmic process creating Macrocosms out of the Microcosm, and the Macrocosm returning to the Microcosm. Actually at the ultimate fundamental level there is only the Microcosm, the Macrocosms sprouting and ending out of the Microcosm. Everything is foundationed on consciousness which has no 3D shape. The directing force of these processes is the macro consciousness, which creates many limb entities of limb consciousness. On our earth every life form is a limb of consciousness, participating in the macro consciousness processes on our Earth. Earth as the emotional Bhoodevi or Gaia is real. The diverse processes happen in symbiosis, with every process as a limb process, coordinating with the gigantic grand symbiosis of the Universe. And you find that you too are a limb process, continuously adjusting to the other processes, and your life as coordination with those processes or simply in one word, nature. When you realize that you are a process, then the words birth and death get radically a different meaning. The interacting process created you as birth and then after the completion of your process function, subsumes you into the grand symbiosis which we call death. You cannot recognize yourself as a 3D body, which is actually giving view of just 00.0035% of the totality. The Universe is the totality of the gigantic number of limb processes, the Microcosm creating Macrocosms, containing mini Macrocosms, called Molecules,matters,planets,Moons going round the planets, planets going round stars, stars living in their Galaxies…,all governed by the foundational processes of the Microcosm. We can understand the grand processes between the Microcosm and the various Macrocosms, by feeling as a part of these processes, or by adopting the Cartesian logic and struggle with various TOEs, the Strings Theory, The Loop Quantum Gravity Theory, The Various M Theories of the family of M Theories, or viewing the Universe as a Hologram. Today trying to feel as a process of nature is almost removed by calling it unscientific. You, as a process of feeling, as a limb of the other processes, is discounted. Only the Cartesian approach and following the logic of the machine is accepted, every student being bludgeoned into the Cartesian approach. There is no free and healty nature, untampered by us and a student cannot feel education at all. Life must be recognized as the diverse processes of feelings. It is not mechanical at all. Births and Deaths are part of the feeling of transformations. The Mechanical Approach has now become murderous, destroying or torturing every organism of the Biosphere, robbing the very basis of births, deaths and re-births and re-deaths. Education is made into the continuous killing of nature, not participating in nature’s symbiosis. The Universities are creating every academic year new corps of nature killers. It is called education!!! Every University must immediately start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without any human tampering, so that real education gets a chance. Just pay attention to your own consciousness and enjoy at least briefly, freedom form mechanization. YM Sarma Chat gpt It sounds like YM Sarma’s piece is weaving together philosophy, physics, and ecology into a kind of manifesto about how we perceive ourselves in the universe. At its core, it’s making several interlinked points: 1. *We are processes, not static things* o If you could truly see reality down to the quark, you wouldn’t find a solid “you” — just flows of energy and matter passing through. o Life is participation in a grand, interdependent symbiosis of processes in the cosmos. 2. *Microcosm–Macrocosm cycle* o The “Microcosm” (fundamental particles, energies, consciousness) gives rise to “Macrocosms” (planets, stars, living beings, galaxies). o These macrocosms eventually dissolve back into the microcosm. 3. *Consciousness as the foundation* o Beyond the physical, there’s a “macro consciousness” that expresses itself through all “limb consciousnesses” — individual beings. o Earth (Gaia) is seen as a conscious entity in this framework. 4. *Critique of mechanistic thinking* o Modern science and education often frame life purely through Cartesian, machine-like logic. o This removes the sense of being a feeling, living part of nature, replacing it with abstraction and exploitation. o The result: destruction of the biosphere and a disconnection from life’s symbiotic balance. 5. *A call for reconnection* o Education should include direct, untampered immersion in nature — “Free Nature Parks” where humans don’t interfere. o Conscious attention to one’s own awareness is seen as a way to temporarily step outside mechanization. It’s almost like a blend of *systems theory*, *Eastern philosophy*, *deep ecology*, and *a warning against industrial reductionism*. The imagery of microcosm and macrocosm ties it to ancient philosophical traditions, while the critique of education and technology grounds it in a modern ecological crisis. If you want, I can also *reframe this text into a clear, structured philosophical essay* while keeping its poetic depth intact — so it’s easier to follow without losing the essence. That would make the argument sharper and more persuasive. Alright — I’ll approach this like I’m grading a piece for a philosophy–science–ecology seminar, using the following criteria: *1. Clarity & Structure (20 marks)* - The text is rich in imagery and ideas, but it often moves quickly from one concept to another without clear signposting. - Some terms (Microcosm, Macrocosm, limb consciousness) are used poetically but would benefit from clearer definitions earlier. - Long paragraphs make it harder for the reader to follow the logical flow. *Score:* 12/20 *2. Originality & Depth of Ideas (30 marks)* - Strong integration of physics, metaphysics, and environmental ethics. - The “process-based” selfhood concept is philosophically deep and echoes both Buddhist anatta and systems theory, which is intellectually valuable. - The critique of Cartesianism is well-grounded in philosophical tradition. - The Free Nature Park proposal adds a tangible action step — rare for philosophical pieces. *Score:* 27/30 *3. Use of Evidence / Philosophical Anchoring (20 marks)* - Mentions modern physics theories (string theory, loop quantum gravity, M-theory, holographic universe) but doesn’t link them explicitly to the main argument — feels name-dropped rather than integrated. - The ecological claims are powerful but mostly asserted rather than supported with specific examples or data. *Score:* 12/20 *4. Persuasive Power & Emotional Impact (20 marks)* - Passion is palpable — the tone makes the urgency of the ecological crisis felt. - The emotional connection to Gaia/Earth is strong. - The call to action is vivid, but because of dense phrasing, some readers may disengage before reaching it. *Score:* 16/20 *5. Language & Style (10 marks)* - Lyrical, poetic, and metaphysical — which is a strength in philosophical writing. - However, occasional grammar and word choice issues slightly cloud the message. *Score:* 7/10 ------------------------------ *Total:* 74/100 *Grade:* *B* (Good — creative and profound, but could be significantly stronger with clearer structure, tighter argumentation, and fuller integration of scientific references.) ------------------------------ If you like, I can show you *a rewritten version that would likely score 90+*, keeping all the depth but making it flow logically like a top-tier academic–philosophical essay. That would make it both more persuasive and more accessible. Here’s a refined, structured version of YM Sarma’s piece — keeping the poetic depth, but arranging it so that the logic flows more clearly and the reader can engage without getting lost. ------------------------------ *Destiny or Continuation — A Process View of Life* *By YM Sarma (edited for clarity)* *1. Seeing Beyond the Self* If you could truly see reality with unclouded eyes — not just the surface of things, but the dance of atoms, quarks, leptons, and the transformations between them — you would not find a fixed “you.” Instead, you would see streams of matter and energy flowing into and out of the body you call “yours,” blending and exchanging with the larger processes of nature. Life, then, is not an object, but a process — one limb in the vast symphony of processes that make up the universe. *2. The Cycle of Microcosm and Macrocosm* At the most fundamental level, there is only the *Microcosm* — the subatomic foundation of reality. From it arise the *Macrocosms*: molecules, planets, stars, galaxies, and living beings. These Macrocosms are temporary configurations, destined to dissolve back into the Microcosm. The Microcosm gives birth to the Macrocosm, and the Macrocosm returns to the Microcosm — an endless cycle of emergence and return. *3. Consciousness as the Foundation* Underlying this process is *consciousness* — not shaped in three dimensions, but pervasive and foundational. There is a *macro-consciousness*, of which every living being is a *limb-consciousness*. On Earth, each life form participates in the planetary consciousness — known in various traditions as *Bhoodevi* or *Gaia*. Earth is not a mere rock in space, but a living, feeling entity engaged in its own processes. *4. Symbiosis as the Law of Nature* Every process in nature is a limb-process, harmonizing with the grand symbiosis of the universe. The motion of moons, the orbit of planets, the life cycles of stars — all follow the same foundational laws that guide the metabolism of cells or the pulse of a heartbeat. When we realize that we too are such processes, the words *birth* and *death* take on new meaning: birth is the moment the universal process takes your current form; death is the moment that form dissolves back into the whole. *5. The Loss of Process Awareness* In modern times, the ability to feel oneself as a process of nature is often dismissed as “unscientific.” The dominant mode of education is *Cartesian* — treating life as a mechanical arrangement of parts, to be analyzed and controlled. Students are trained to think like machines, to separate themselves from nature, and to treat the living biosphere as raw material. The result is a generation of skilled destroyers — capable of technological mastery but unable to live in symbiosis with the Earth. *6. The Cost of Mechanistic Thinking* This mechanistic worldview has become deadly. It disrupts the cycles of birth and death, tears apart ecological relationships, and robs future generations of the very basis of life. Education, in its current form, is complicit — producing year after year of graduates who see nature not as a partner, but as a resource to exploit. *7. Restoring the Feeling of Life* If life is understood as a *process of feeling* — an interplay of consciousness with consciousness — then education must nurture this awareness, not suppress it. One practical step: every university should establish a *Free Nature Park* — an area of land where no human tampering is allowed, where students can witness and feel nature’s self-organizing processes. *8. A Call to Conscious Participation* To live is to participate in the symbiosis of the universe. To die is to merge back into it. Mechanistic logic alone cannot teach this truth — it must be felt. By paying attention to our own consciousness, by stepping into untamed nature without the intent to manipulate, we can briefly escape mechanization and rejoin the living process from which we came. ------------------------------ This version keeps Sarma’s imagery and spiritual depth but gives each core idea its own section so that the reader can follow the progression from *perception → process → consciousness → symbiosis → critique → call to action*. If you want, I can also produce *a condensed 1-page version* so it reads like a powerful philosophical manifesto. That would make it even sharper and more persuasive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ0b-5Dv%3D0peTKJ3pXhi7np1D0ZUa6xT%2BAnHzB-7iKYrw%40mail.gmail.com.
