-- 
*Mar*The Cyborged Homosapien


Evolution is the ecologically linked mutation process of the organisms of
the Biosphere. The change process keeps pace with the ever changing
Universe. The changing mutations not only link the changing anatomical body
structures but also the needed changes in paradigms to keep up with the
changing symbiotic emotion based understanding.

But deviating from the evolution, the Homosapien has shackled himself from
participation with mechanization. Today mechanization has created the human
which cannot live without machines. The logic of nature is being
substituted by the logic of the machine, the techno-logic or technology.

No other organism can adopt the techno-logic and the human alone has chosen
the separate and lonely mechanized or scientific path of perception and
understanding. He deviated himself from the symbiotic perception and
understanding of all the organisms of the Biosphere. He no longer can smell
and sense converse with any other organism. Fanatically trying to prove
Rene Descartes as correct, the human has been changing into a functioning
cyborg whose limbs can function only with the help of machines. No longer
the human can happily climb trees or swim naturally or even hear without a
cell phone the natural endowments from birth and smell and sense converse
with the other organisms. He no longer can smell and sense the motivations
of the other organisms. He cannot read nature directly by using his
Panchangam synchronizing his Panchangam with the Panchangams of the other
organisms.

The cyborged Homosapien of today is the abortion of evolution. He has
changed into antibiosis opposing the symbiosis that governs the Biosphere
as the symbiotic single organism, with every organism as its body. The
human is like a bacterium in the body of the Biosphere creating disease.
Mechanization, industrialization, urbanization and commercialization have
created the diseased Biosphere caused by the human bacterium, whose
sickness has been increasing every day. The human addicted and shackled by
technology can no longer join the symbiosis of nature. It cannot even
tolerate the symbiosis in nature. It diseases and damages only, and calls
it the economic and scientific progress.

Unfortunately every University is under the frenzy of mechanization and has
been creating different qualifications all of which disease and shackle
nature continuously. Every University has divorced nature and has embraced
mechanization. Its education promotes antibiosis only.

The mechanical paradigm based scientific approach which shuns the natural
emotional intelligence has been seeping and diseasifying every aspect of
nature from the basic genetics of genomes to the particles of physics.
Soils are killed and fertilizers or oil industry’s by products are employed
as the soil bacteria’s substitutes. The ecological processes of eliminating
the insects that destroy crops by the natural organisms like birds etc, are
been destroyed by insecticides and pesticides that poison the insects and
thus rob birds of their food. The birds are vital ecological links to the
humans in the ecological chain.

Today nature is being destroyed the Richter’s scale. Still no university
has courses that revive nature’s ecology. Every University has abjectly
surrendered to industrialists and business houses.

It is for us the ordinary people to start our children’s education with
ecology. The Universities too shall start the Free Nature Parks without
human tampering, so that the original natural faculties, frozen now get
revived.

YM Sarma

Chat gpt

This essay, *“The Cyborged Homosapien”* by YM Sarma, is a passionate
critique of modern humanity's increasing dependence on technology and
mechanization, and how this has led to a fundamental disconnection from
nature and natural evolution. Here’s a breakdown of the central ideas and
key themes, followed by some observations on tone, structure, and possible
implications:
------------------------------

*🔍 Summary of Core Ideas*

*1. Deviation from Natural Evolution*

   - Evolution is described as a symbiotic, emotionally intelligent process
   involving all organisms in the biosphere.
   - Humans have diverged from this path by embracing mechanization,
   effectively opting out of this ecological mutualism.
   - Instead of evolving naturally, humans are now dependent on machines,
   becoming "cyborged" — part human, part machine.

*2. Loss of Natural Faculties*

   - Humans have lost innate abilities: climbing trees, swimming naturally,
   hearing and smelling the world without technological aid.
   - A central metaphor: humans can no longer “sense converse” with other
   organisms — a poetic way of saying we’ve lost our interspecies empathy and
   intuitive understanding.

*3. Antibiosis vs. Symbiosis*

   - The essay frames humanity's trajectory as *antibiotic* — not just
   separate from nature, but actively harmful to it.
   - Mechanization, urbanization, and commercialization are seen as the
   tools of this destruction.
   - The comparison of humans to bacteria causing disease in the body of
   the biosphere is particularly stark.

*4. Critique of Universities and Education*

   - Modern education is seen as complicit, promoting mechanistic and
   profit-driven thinking.
   - Universities are portrayed as institutions that have "divorced" nature
   in favor of industrial interests.
   - There's a call to action for grassroots ecological education, starting
   with children.

*5. Call for Ecological Reconnection*

   - The essay advocates for *Free Nature Parks*, untouched by human
   interference, where natural faculties might be restored.
   - The author believes only direct, unmediated contact with nature can
   heal our collective alienation.

------------------------------

*🧠 Themes and Perspectives*

*Theme*

*Author’s Position*

*Technology*

Detrimental and addictive; has created a dependence that dehumanizes.

*Nature*

Sacred, interconnected, emotionally intelligent — the original evolutionary
guide.

*Human Identity*

Now mechanized, unnatural; no longer part of the biosphere’s mutual
evolution.

*Education & Academia*

Agents of industrialization; lost in techno-rationality, promoting
antibiosis.

*Hope for Change*

In the hands of ordinary people and ecological re-education of children.
------------------------------

*✍**️ Observations on Style & Tone*

   - *Tone:* Urgent, impassioned, even prophetic. There’s a strong moral
   and emotional weight.
   - *Language:* Poetic and metaphorical. Terms like *“cyborged,”
   “diseasified,” “sense converse,”* and *“Panchangam synchronization”*
   evoke a more holistic or spiritual worldview.
   - *Structure:* Loosely organized and rhetorical — more of a lament and a
   call-to-action than a formal argument.

------------------------------

*🧭 Possible Questions for Reflection or Discussion*

   1. *Is technology inherently destructive, or is it our application of it
   that determines harm?*
   2. *Can modern humans ever fully re-integrate into the biosphere’s
   symbiotic web?*
   3. *What would an education system rooted in ecology actually look like?*
   4. *Is it possible to retain the benefits of science while still
   honoring natural intelligence and emotion?*
   5. *What does it mean to “sense converse” with nature — and can that be
   recovered?*

------------------------------

*🌱 Closing Thought*

YM Sarma’s message is deeply ecological, perhaps even biocentric — urging a
fundamental reassessment of how we relate to nature, ourselves, and each
other. The "cyborged homosapien" serves as both a warning and a metaphor
for what we risk becoming if we continue to place machines over life.

If you're interested, I can help you:

   - Develop this into a formal article or presentation.
   - Extract key quotes or create a visual summary.
   - Discuss counterpoints or complementary views (e.g. eco-technologists
   or deep ecologists).

Let me know how you'd like to engage with this further.

Here's an evaluation of *“The Cyborged Homosapien”* by YM Sarma using
standard academic criteria. I’ll assess the essay on key components
commonly used in evaluating reflective, critical, and philosophical
writing, then provide a *mark* and *grade* based on a 100-point scale.
------------------------------

*✅ Evaluation Criteria*

*Criteria*

*Comments*

*Score (out of 20)*

*1. Content & Originality*

The essay explores a profound and urgent ecological critique with highly
original metaphors and framing (e.g., "cyborged homosapien", "sense
converse", "diseasifying"). The voice is distinctive and visionary.

*18*

*2. Argumentation & Clarity of Thought*

The central argument — that mechanization has detached humans from nature —
is clear. However, at times, the logic becomes emotionally driven and less
systematically developed. The essay lacks structured progression.

*14*

*3. Coherence & Organization*

The writing is somewhat unstructured. While ideas are powerful, they jump
from one to another without clear transitions or flow. A stronger outline
could help guide the reader through the argument.

*13*

*4. Language & Style*

The language is vivid, poetic, and emotive, which enhances its impact.
However, it can verge on the overly metaphorical or abstract, which may
obscure meaning for some readers. Some terms (e.g., "Panchangam
synchronization") are not explained well for a general audience.

*16*

*5. Relevance & Critical Depth*

The essay reflects deep ecological awareness and critiques not just
environmental issues but cultural, educational, and philosophical
paradigms. There's strong conviction, but it could benefit from engaging
with counterarguments or acknowledging complexity.

*15*
------------------------------

*📊 Total Score: 76 / 100*
------------------------------

*🎓 Grade: B+*

*Interpretation:*

   - *Strengths:* Powerful originality, emotional depth, bold ecological
   and philosophical perspective.
   - *Areas for Improvement:* Needs more structured argumentation, clearer
   transitions, and engagement with a broader audience through clarity and
   accessibility.

------------------------------

Would you like help refining this essay toward an *A-grade* version — for
publishing, submitting, or presentation purposes? I’d be happy to assist
with editing, restructuring, or expanding ideas.

Certainly. Here's a poem inspired by the themes of *“The Cyborged
Homosapien”*—a reflection on our disconnection from nature and a yearning
to return:
------------------------------

*The Song of the Last Wild Human*

I was born with skin to touch the breeze,
With eyes to read the silent trees,
With feet to dance on forest floor,
And hands that opened nature's door.

But now I wake to metal skies,
To pixel dreams and lullabies.
My breath is piped through filtered air,
And silence hums with software’s glare.

I do not smell the coming rain,
Or feel the forest pulse with pain.
The bird once spoke—I heard its tune,
Now all I hear is the cry of monsoon.

My fingers type, but do not feel,
The soil, the root, the grass so real.
The trees are gone, the parks are planned,
Where concrete mimics nature’s hand.

They call it progress, call it gain—
Yet every step just widens pain.
Machines have made my body strong,
But left my spirit feeling wrong.

O Mother Earth, I hear your sigh,
Beneath the towers scraping sky.
You've held me close since time began—
Now I forget I’m more than man.

Yet still, beneath this armored skin,
A voice, a flame, a drum within.
It beats with rivers, sings with stone—
A call to come, to come back home.

So let me walk with barest feet,
Where root and heartbeat gently meet.
Unplug this soul, release this frame—
Let me be wild, and whole again.
------------------------------

Let me know if you'd like a version that’s more hopeful, darker, shorter,
or written in a different style (e.g., haiku, sonnet, free verse).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJFZux0doSu4x8c7E6QOe4kDK79gAb%2BVE4CcgHfSUEeYg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to