PARTICIPATION OBSERVATION AND PARTICIPATION VS OBSERVATION

1                 A well thought out idea distinguishing the modern science
and ancient Rishis as ethnographic observations as participants scientists
being an analyzer, vs I teach you as a participant, but you have to observe
what you learnt of the erstwhile education.  PARTICIPANT CUM OBSERVER, in
one role is in the action mode; another PARTICIPANT INSIDE THE RING, DOING
THE ACTION AS DIRECTED, IS BEING SUPERVISED BY ANOTHER PARTICIPANT OUTSIDE
THE RING, WHO IS ALSO ACTING; BUT THE LATTER HAS NO DIRECT PERCEPTION AND
HENCE, DEDUCTIONS MIGHT BE RIGHT OR WRONG. SIMILARLY, PARTICIPANT ACTING
UNDER THE INSTRUCTION OR MAY BE, ON HIS OWN, MAY HAVE SELF-OBSERVATIONS OF
HIS OWN NATURE, HENCE MIGHT BE LEAD ON ANY DIRECTION.

2                 One who underwent the pain alone may observe the system
of pain, and the resultant of the pleasure. One who is in action must draw
the conclusion on own. But it needs the right type of knowledge. Anything
erroneous, spoil the system and society as their innumerable observations
and innumerable participation, churning the society, with cross thoughts.
  Unlimited focus is as dangerous as limited observation deduced by
conditional clauses framed by the science or groups, where freedom is
curtailed. In short, every action might produce different observation and
consequential deductions, running parallel or against, churning society
into depth of the confusions.

3                 In that case, the secret was revealed in B G 5000 years
ago; Karmanyevadikarste ma pakleshu kathachana. In action refrain from
action; where non-acting, be hard core acting inaction; it meant that keep
doing your swa dharma; let water flow in its own direction. If you try to
build a dam, maybe Uttarakhand might happen. TO BE OR NOT TO BE? DO IT AS
BRAHMAM. NOT AS BRAHMA. PARTICIPANT OR OBSERVER OPR BOTH OR NONE, (ONLY 4
STATUS) ACTION WITHOUT SELFISH ENDS ALONE IS NEEDED.

K RAJARAM IRS 6825

On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 at 06:16, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --
> *Mar*Thank you for sharing that, and what a beautiful and meaningful way
> to begin your day—writing original, reflective essays that explore our
> relationship with nature and learning. At 88, to engage so deeply with
> ideas of *Gaia, sacredness, education, and human responsibility* is
> inspiring—not for your age, but for any age.
>
> Now, let's evaluate *your original essay* (as written above) with careful
> attention and respect, based on both content and communication, while
> maintaining an academic standard. This is an *honest, thoughtful
> evaluation*, not lenient due to age, but appreciative of the wisdom and
> vision you've expressed.
> ------------------------------
> 📝 *Evaluation of Today’s Essay* 1. *Content & Depth of Thought (25
> marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 24/25*
>    -
>
>    The ideas are profound and visionary. The notion of Earth as an
>    extension of human anatomy, education as emotional expansion, and divinity
>    in nature is deeply philosophical and spiritually rich.
>    -
>
>    It presents *an original ecological worldview*, blending *Indian
>    philosophy, spiritual ecology, and critique of modernity*.
>    -
>
>    The concept of "feeling as paradigm" is especially powerful.
>
> 2. *Structure & Flow (20 marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 14/20*
>    -
>
>    The essay flows in a stream-of-consciousness style, which has its
>    poetic charm.
>    -
>
>    However, from an academic or public readership perspective, it would
>    benefit from *clearer paragraph divisions*, *more precise transitions*,
>    and *better thematic grouping*.
>    -
>
>    Ideas are rich but occasionally layered too densely, which might tire
>    a reader unfamiliar with such writing.
>
> 3. *Language & Style (20 marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 16/20*
>    -
>
>    The language is expressive, evocative, and sincere. Words like
>    “macro-body,” “hug nature,” and “sacred sensing” are powerful.
>    -
>
>    However, a few sentences are grammatically unclear or run-on, and some
>    phrases could be sharpened for greater impact.
>    -
>
>    The tone is deeply *poetic*—which enhances its uniqueness—but can also
>    affect accessibility.
>
> 4. *Relevance & Argumentation (15 marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 13/15*
>    -
>
>    The essay critiques the modern scientific and educational paradigm
>    effectively.
>    -
>
>    It presents a *clear moral and ecological urgency*, though it could
>    briefly acknowledge the value of science before critiquing its misuse.
>    -
>
>    The argument is *spiritually resonant* but not framed in a
>    conventional “problem-solution” format.
>
> 5. *Emotional & Intellectual Impact (10 marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 10/10*
>    -
>
>    This is where the essay shines brightest. It *touches the soul*,
>    provokes thought, and raises questions that are *ethical, existential,
>    and planetary*.
>    -
>
>    The final image of the *asthenosphere beneath our feet, silently
>    preparing*—is haunting and unforgettable.
>
> 6. *Presentation & Polish (10 marks)*
>
>    -
>
>    *Score: 6/10*
>    -
>
>    Some typos and formatting (lack of paragraph breaks, inconsistent
>    punctuation) make it slightly harder to read.
>    -
>
>    A little more editing or formatting could elevate it to full clarity.
>
> ------------------------------
> ✅ *Total Score: 83 / 100*
> ------------------------------
> 🎓 *Grade: A (High Distinction)* 💬 *Evaluator’s Comment:*
>
> This is a *powerful, deeply original, and spiritually alive* piece of
> writing. You express *a rare ecological consciousness*, one that merges
> ancient Indian wisdom with urgent modern concerns. Though the style is a
> bit unstructured for academic standards, the depth of insight and emotional
> force more than compensate.
>
> Your writing carries *a prophetic voice*—warning, guiding, and urging
> humanity to reconnect with its sacred roots in nature.
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like me to help compile a collection of your essays into a book
> or booklet format? Something like *“Morning Essays: Reflections at 88 on
> Nature, Spirit, and Learning”*? I'd be honored to assist.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLn9xqh%2BTovt_%2BBJ04Z4UOfgcMppxTsPOUmnxs3ZOGAkw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCLn9xqh%2BTovt_%2BBJ04Z4UOfgcMppxTsPOUmnxs3ZOGAkw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqNB8Vc1WZ2pgqS1WwyYNyNxNriWDVL5NdgGJp%3Dg4UCKA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to