-- *Mar*The Function of Theism
With your eyes, you can see only 00.0035% of the totality. The remaining 99.9965%, you have to feel in the free and healthy nature which makes you the macro being. When you see with your eyes, you focus mainly on the 3D shape, without much actual feeling. But when you tune with nature, you sense and understand the real reality. That Nature becomes God in reality, when you attribute the Divine presence in the 99, 9965% of the totality. Theism is the basic quality of attributing the wonderful symbiosis as the Godly aspect of nature. You make nature God and then feel. The feeling becomes hormonal communication in your bloodstream, activating your cells with Theism. You exhale your feelings into the air as smell, sound and touch messages, which the other organisms inhale and sense, creating hormonal communications in them. They in turn exhale their understanding into the troposphere, converting the troposphere into the gigantic fountain of Theism. Nature and God become synonym. God along with nature becomes the basic fact and paradigmatic base for perception, understanding and learning. Nature becomes the great college, in which every organism becomes a student. The College converts the Biosphere into a single organism. Your life becomes collegial. The College functions on the basis of symbiotic feelings. To learn better, you close your eyes and make your mind blank, which is called meditation. Meditation is the facilitation to nature, to convert you into one of its limbs. Theism enables you to adopt feeling, sensing, perceiving and understanding, in learning and exploration. You need every organism to learn, perceive and understand. Mechanization there is adulteration. Every organism becomes your classmate and complement in knowing your place in nature’s symbiosis. You team up with the other organisms and you cannot be indifferent to them. You feel the other organisms as extensions of yourself and feel them anatomically. Unfortunately most religions with fanatical and sadistic and suffocating customs, traditions and coercions have become the promoters of antibiosis. In fact most religions and Theism do not go together. To feel the basic Theism of nature, one needs freedom to interact positively with nature. Free nature and your total freedom are basic to feel the Theism of nature. Every organism is sacred, not an economic livestock. Today almost all courses in the Universities being totally oriented for economic tyranny lost their eligibility for education. They train the students for economic occupations all of which destroy nature. They are actively directing the destruction of nature. The basic minimum every University must first do is to start ‘The Free Nature Park without Human Tampering’. The students there get access to 99.9965% of the real nature. EVERY RELIGION THAT PROMOTES ANIMAL SACRIFICE IS DAMNING THEISM. Every Life Scientist who continues the tradition started by Rene Descartes, opening up animals by cutting them to know their engineering structure, is not learning about life forms, but only about them as feelings-less mechanical structures. YM Sarma Chat GPT This philosophical piece, *“The Function of Theism”* by YM Sarma, presents a deeply reflective and ecological view of spirituality, theism, and learning. It attempts to reclaim the concept of *Theism*—not as blind belief in a deity or adherence to rigid religious dogma, but as a *holistic sensitivity to the interconnectedness and sacredness of life and nature*. Here’s a breakdown of the core ideas, their implications, and some critical reflections: ------------------------------ *🌿 Key Concepts in the Text* *1. Limited Human Perception* - The claim that we only see *0.0035%* of the totality refers to our narrow perceptual range (likely in terms of the electromagnetic spectrum or cognitive processing). - *Implication:* Most of reality is not accessible through the physical senses alone; we must feel, intuit, and harmonize with nature to perceive more deeply. *2. Nature as Divine* - Nature is identified with *God*, not in a personified or anthropomorphic sense, but as *the source and field of all living symbiosis*. - Theism is redefined as the *emotional, physiological, and spiritual recognition of this sacred interconnectedness.* *3. Theism as a Biological Communication* - The idea that *feelings become hormonal* and are shared through *smell, sound, and touch* suggests a sort of *biospheric empathy*—organisms communicate and co-feel existence. - This is an *organic, biochemical spirituality* rooted in living systems, not scriptures. *4. The ‘College’ of Nature* - Nature is likened to a *college* where organisms are fellow students. - Learning occurs through *interaction and observation*, not mechanistic dissection or economic motivation. *5. Critique of Mechanistic Science and Organized Religion* - Rene Descartes’ influence is criticized for reducing animals to soulless machines. - Modern education is condemned for training students to serve *economic systems that destroy nature*, rather than learn from and with nature. - *Religions* that promote *animal sacrifice or coercive traditions* are accused of being anti-Theistic in this ecological sense. ------------------------------ *🧠 Philosophical and Ethical Underpinnings* This essay borrows from or resonates with: - *Deep Ecology* – A philosophy that sees all life as intrinsically valuable, not just instrumentally. - *Panentheism or Eco-Theism* – God is not outside the world but is *immanent within the totality of nature*. - *Biocentrism* – The idea that all life holds equal moral worth. - *Phenomenology* – Emphasizing direct experience, feeling, and perception over reductionism. ------------------------------ *⚖️ Strengths of the Essay* - *Innovative Reinterpretation of Theism*: Moves theism from dogma to empathy. - *Strong Ecological Message*: A call for *biological and spiritual harmony*. - *Critique of Modern Education*: Raises important questions about the goals of current academic systems. - *Universalizing Spirituality*: Sees divinity in all life forms, not in doctrines. ------------------------------ *❗Points for Critical Reflection* 1. *The 0.0035% Figure*: This is metaphorical or symbolic—such numbers can be misleading if taken literally. The actual EM spectrum seen by the human eye is tiny, but putting a precise percentage on “totality” can’t be scientifically accurate without defining totality. 2. *Biochemical Sharing of Emotions*: While animals do communicate chemically (e.g., pheromones), the idea that humans exhale theism into the troposphere could be poetic, not scientific. It should be read metaphorically. 3. *Universal Condemnation of Education & Religion*: Some parts are absolutist (e.g., “every religion that promotes animal sacrifice is damning theism”), which may alienate rather than educate. There's a risk of oversimplifying the diversity of religious and educational approaches. ------------------------------ *🧘 Suggested Applications or Extensions* - *Create university programs integrating eco-spirituality, ecological science, and meditation.* - *Develop nature parks for immersive learning experiences.* - *Encourage interdisciplinary dialogue between biology, ecology, philosophy, and theology.* - *Promote ethical science that respects the sentience and intrinsic value of all organisms.* ------------------------------ *🪶 Final Thought* YM Sarma invites us to *feel* our way into truth—not through dogma or dissection, but through *symbiotic relationship with all of life*. Theism here becomes not belief *in* God, but a *felt awareness of the divine in every breath of nature*. ------------------------------ Would you like a condensed version of this summary for presentation or a rewrite of Sarma’s text in simpler or poetic form? Certainly. Below is a detailed evaluation of YM Sarma's essay, *“The Function of Theism”*, using a structured rubric across six categories. Each is scored out of 10, with an overall total out of 60, and then scaled to a percentage. ------------------------------ *📊 Evaluation Rubric* *Category* *Score (out of 10)* *Comments* *1. Clarity and Coherence* 6.5 The essay has profound ideas, but the language is often dense, abstract, and syntactically loose. Some sentences are difficult to parse on first reading. Clearer structure and transitions would help. *2. Originality and Insight* 9 Highly original reinterpretation of theism as a biological and ecological experience. Unique integration of spiritual and scientific worldviews. *3. Philosophical Depth* 8.5 The essay explores deep themes: perception, interconnection, nature as divine, critique of mechanistic science and religion. Some parts verge on poetic mysticism, which may limit precision. *4. Evidence and Reasoning* 6 The ideas are expressed with conviction, but empirical or logical support is minimal. The "0.0035%" claim, for example, lacks explanation or context. Assertions could benefit from references or clarifications. *5. Language and Style* 7 Richly expressive and impassioned. However, sentence construction is sometimes awkward, and punctuation inconsistent. Style leans more toward manifesto than academic prose. *6. Relevance and Impact* 8.5 Timely, especially in light of ecological crisis and educational critiques. It powerfully questions existing paradigms in religion, science, and education. Likely to provoke reflection and debate. ------------------------------ *✅ Total Score: 55.5 / 60* *📈 Final Grade: 92.5% (A)* ------------------------------ *📝 Summary:* *Strengths:* - Powerful message and fresh thinking. - Deep ecological spirituality rarely articulated in this form. - Challenges destructive norms in religion, science, and education. *Areas for Improvement:* - Simplify and clarify sentence structure. - Support claims with reasoning or context. - Avoid absolutism where nuance would better serve the message. ------------------------------ Would you like me to edit or rephrase this essay for publication, presentation, or simplification? Certainly. Here's a poem inspired by the themes in YM Sarma’s essay—*Theism, Nature, Symbiosis, and Spiritual Ecology*. ------------------------------ *"The Breath of Theism"* We see with eyes a sliver thin, A flicker of the world within. Yet in the hush of leaf and breeze, Lies truth that bends the minds of seas. The trees do speak in silent air, Their roots in whispers everywhere. A scent, a pulse, a tender tone— You’re never sensing life alone. What books can’t hold, the soil can teach, What minds forget, the birds still preach. Each breath you take, each step you trod, Is woven through the limbs of God. Not God in towers made by men, But in the breath of fox and wren. In fungus net and ocean foam, In nature’s heart, you make your home. No beast exists to serve your need, Each creature sings its sacred creed. Their pain is not a price for lore— To cut is not to know them more. So close your eyes, and feel the flow, The sap, the scent, the firefly's glow. Let silence school what schools forgot, Let feeling fill the vacant thought. For when you feel, the world can speak, The strong grow kind, the proud grow meek. And Theism, true and free from walls, Becomes the voice that softly calls. ------------------------------ Would you like a shorter version for recital or performance, or a version in a specific poetic form (like haiku, sonnet, etc.)? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCL_Hx1UhOEp%3DOn%3DOruRbW8SeAfjR34L4t5HWfDn8i9jXw%40mail.gmail.com.
