Dear all attached word doc on riddle number 5 apaurusheya being criticised. Ambedkar though intelligent appears to be a pervert also in forcibly interpreting the worst scenario to pooh [p[ooh theIndian @ world treasure. Veda says that (as read in many places including B G) it was transmitted to Brahma who is now 50 year old. And as Boudeekam accepts that all existed already and manifested. Science does accept it. THAT MEANS, BRAHMAM EXISTED PURUSHA AND PRAKRITI MATTER WERE IN THE BRAHMAM. SO DO VEDAS. A FLICKERING JYOTHI AND ALL IN DARKNESS. Jyothi has no body. So no one knows who is brahmam and upanishad describes that as NETI NETI. THERE WAS SOUND. DESIRE TO MANIFESTATIONS AROSE. So by GODs we mean whom we worship in black and white and do we worship Brahma The paramatma? NO. So did we get the definition of GOD? Sound is eternal even if science accepts it. If so, what's wrong in the statement of Jaimini that sound ,word, object so brahmam etc are eternal apaurusheya? Krishna is GOD as manifested by unknown Brahmam; if so even God did not pronounce it correctly. What was with Brahmam as sound and object were heard by GODs and Rishis who added their names; if so what confusion Ambedkar had about the reason for Rishis' names. The word doc attacheded is 50 pages on riddle 5 Now pl read K R IRS 5725
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo8vzgib4cEGuPy4hAzBHtJcVCOVbRmx-D%3DtFpA6LFwKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
RIDDLE NO 5 ambbedkar.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
