-- *Mar*The Spread of Antibiosis
Today the continuous destruction of nature has become economic, scientific and cultural advancement and progress. Wherever there is scope for economic exploitation, there will be an attempt and action to exploit the economic resources, irrespective of the environmental and morale cost to the Biosphere. We have become the chronic disease to nature. Every organism, all nature grows every nano second in new enlightenments. Changing Universe means, the Universe that learns continuously. One can learn in nature as nature in the nature that grows in learning and changing continuously. In fact one is part of nature and simply cannot be the outside observer. We get education from nature from not only what we see, but mainly from what we do not see with our eyes, which is 99.9967% of the totality. We have to feel and the free and healthy nature, puts us under its enchanting spell, in utter and total rapture laden concentration. Every organism emotionally merges with you, adding to you as a person. Every organism becomes your limb. You grow happily and healthily with the free, happy and healthy nature. Nature takes you to new and new chapters, every chapter a new and fresh chapter sprouting from nature that complements the previous learning. Nature does not stagnate you with definitions, scopes and arrest your perception by feeling nature. The medium of education of nature consists of arts, the music that tunes, poems, songs, dances, prayer, yoga, all of which need the free and healthy nature. One must feel the living nature, in one word- symbiosis. Today, the exact and complete antibiosis has taken over completely. From the LKG to the PhD we teach the students how to destroy nature for economic advancement. Economics has become the octopus that gobbles; even arts have been industrialized and commercialized. We divorce arts from nature and we have machines that precisely, mathematically and accurately produce the artistic phenomenon. But they are not the manifestations of the new fields into which nature takes to. Natural growth is always faltering but the mechanized duplication with defined standards, say under the famous or infamous scientific management, and mechanical temperament is basically anti nature. Now nature is destroyed from every angle, whole Geography is under fatal attack, the economic geography has become the murderous geography. The very living nature, in rainfalls, snowfalls, ocean currents, wind systems, everything is under fatal attack. Whole ice is vanishing from the ice bound world threatening the system of ocean currents and the climatic regions, but there is only the attempt to fill up the ice caps, the poles, Greenland etc with industries. Most glaciers in the Himalayas are dying. It is for the Universities to save nature by first urgently starting the Free Nature Parks, where the students read nature by feeling nature and reduce their dependence on books and computers. Economics has jaded every finer emotions. YM Sarma Chat GPT The piece you've shared, titled *The Spread of Antibiosis*, seems to reflect a deep concern about the degradation of nature due to economic exploitation, and how human progress and industrialization often come at the cost of our environment. The author paints a picture of nature as a living, learning entity, capable of teaching us profound lessons that we can’t simply glean from books or computers. Instead, we must feel nature with our senses, engage with it emotionally, and experience symbiosis, where we are not just observers, but active participants in the natural world. The author contrasts the organic growth of nature with the mechanized, economic-driven systems that are now pervasive, stating that economic and scientific advancements often lead to the destruction of the very thing that sustains us. There's an urgent plea for a change in how we approach education, urging institutions like universities to create free nature parks where students can directly engage with nature, reducing their reliance on the intellectualized, often detached ways of learning. There's also an indictment of how even arts have been commercialized and industrialized, with the true essence of artistic creation now mechanized and detached from the life and energy that nature provides. The piece expresses concern about the environmental destruction happening at a global scale, including the melting of glaciers and the destruction of ecosystems, warning that economic geography has become a dangerous force. The message seems to be a call for a return to nature, a deeper understanding of our interconnectedness with it, and an urgent need to rethink the ways in which we progress as a species. It encourages a symbiotic relationship with nature, where both human growth and natural preservation can exist together, rather than one exploiting the other. Would you like to dive deeper into any specific part of the text, or would you like to discuss some related ideas or themes? Thank you for sharing this thought-provoking piece. The themes presented in the text about the exploitation of nature and the erosion of genuine connection with the environment are indeed profound. It feels like a critique of how modern systems—whether economic, educational, or technological—have created a separation between humans and the natural world. The concept of antibiosis is particularly interesting here: the idea that instead of living in harmony with nature, our actions have become fundamentally destructive, pushing us further away from the kind of symbiosis the author calls for. The argument that industries and education have become more focused on economic growth and technological advancement, to the detriment of the environment, is powerful. The idea that even the arts have become commodified and detached from nature’s true essence underscores the broader issue of industrialization replacing natural, organic processes. The concept of "Free Nature Parks" is a fascinating and compelling proposal, as it suggests a way to bring students (and people in general) back to direct, unmediated contact with nature. This would allow for a more holistic understanding of the world, one that incorporates sensory, emotional, and experiential learning, rather than relying solely on intellectualized, book-based education. What are your thoughts on this idea of "Free Nature Parks"? How do you think such a space might change the way we engage with the environment and our learning systems? The idea of "Free Nature Parks" as a space for immersive, experiential learning is quite compelling. In a world where education is largely mediated by books, screens, and standardized systems, having a physical space where students can directly experience nature would offer a profound shift in how we approach learning and our relationship with the environment. One of the key strengths of this concept is that it emphasizes sensory and emotional engagement. Nature, in all its complexity, is something we often overlook in our fast-paced, technology-driven society. The textures of leaves, the sound of wind, the rhythm of water – these are all aspects of nature that provide a kind of knowledge we can't easily gain from books or lectures. By creating a space where students can "feel" nature, we might foster a deeper connection to the environment and a more visceral understanding of our place in the natural world. In such a "Free Nature Park," learning could go beyond theoretical concepts and touch upon more holistic, embodied forms of knowledge. Instead of being taught *about* ecosystems, for example, students could experience ecosystems firsthand—observe the interdependent relationships between species, see how changes in one part of the environment affect others, and learn to appreciate the complexity of natural systems. This kind of learning encourages empathy and respect for the world around us, which is hard to cultivate through abstract, detached methods of education. Additionally, these parks could offer a space for reflection and mindfulness. Activities like yoga, art, and poetry that the text mentions could be integrated into the experience, helping students tap into their creativity and emotions in ways that are deeply connected to the environment. The arts, in this context, could be seen as a bridge between human expression and nature’s rhythms, something that the piece highlights as being lost in the modern, mechanized world. As for the impact on the broader educational system, introducing such parks could shift the focus from purely academic knowledge toward a more well-rounded, emotionally intelligent form of learning. It could foster a generation of students who not only understand environmental issues but also feel a personal stake in the preservation of the natural world. This could potentially lead to more responsible citizens who approach development with a sense of ecological consciousness. In a way, these parks might also serve as a sanctuary for educators and students alike, offering a reprieve from the pressures of modern academic and economic systems that often prioritize profit over wellbeing and sustainability. What do you think? Could a space like this really help shift the cultural and educational focus back toward nature? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BLvx6OQv6cnv1c3wFj9AWyapTLurw3DX%3DbO29jDCEnFA%40mail.gmail.com.
