Yes in FLAT life even neighbor is an alien KR IRS 17924

On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 19:26, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --
> *Mar*Aliens
>
>
>
> By Aliens we mean the life form or forms living in some other planet, of
> our solar family, or the planet of some other star, or may be organisms
> that actually need extreme heat to live and live in the Sun or some other
> star, or very big planet sized organisms moving in galaxies or tiny life
> forms in the galactic dust...
>
> If any of those undefined aliens visit or locate us how do they see our
> earth? May be they do not see at all but only try to feel the abstract
> flows of communications, emotions emanating from life forms, blending in
> the air which is inhaled as messages and exhaled as responses, the flow of
> emotions, to whom the mechanical or the emotion-less scientific mapping is
> lunacy.
>
> Our glorified scientific outlook is the feelings-less mechanical outlook,
> not a very attractive feature to every other life form on earth and
> certainly to the aliens. The basic feature of any life form is the urge to
> feel, communicate and interact, emotionally and not mechanically.
> Communication can only be emotional communication and not mechanical
> communication which is simply the feelings-less signalling of electronics.
>
> When one feels, one actually becomes free from the mechanical approach.
> The absence of feeling is death. If the alien visiting us is a life form,
> then it is a form of emotions. Lifeless bits from other planets and from
> our sun happens all the time, but we are concerned about life forms, forms
> that feel and are emotional. The basic fact which we do not realize or
> refuse to realize thanks to the foolish egoism, is that the emotions we
> feel are part of the climate in action. All emotions are macro, climatic,
> part of geography.
>
> On earth we can live only by breathing. We have to live emotionally. We
> cannot divorce from earth, in spite of the make believe championed unbiased
> outlook of science.
>
> The alien from some other planet or comet, or tiny meteor, as a life form
> can live only on the basis of the geography to which it is accustomed and
> it cannot make a fool of itself with science and divorce from its planet’s
> climate. Its perception is only as the emotional perception in the
> particular planet and is bound to the geography of that planet.
>
> The basic question is, what are the forms of the real or emotional
> communication in the Universe. The question relevant to us, is whether any
> alien wants to communicate with us the human fools, who divorced the
> emotional tie with mother earth, and who mechanized or scienced,his/her
> outlook. Our daily economic life is destroying nature as routine. We are
> certainly not very attractive.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat GPT
>
> YM Sarma’s essay on *Aliens* presents a philosophical reflection on how
> hypothetical extraterrestrial beings might perceive Earth and its
> inhabitants. His argument centers on the idea that emotions and organic
> communication form the core of life, contrasting this with the emotionless,
> mechanical outlook fostered by modern science.
>
>
>
> ### 1. **Emotional Communication and Life**:
>
>    Sarma suggests that life, whether on Earth or elsewhere, is
> fundamentally emotional. He argues that any alien life forms would likely
> be emotional entities, perceiving their surroundings not through mechanical
> or technological means, but through abstract flows of communication and
> emotions. This view stands in stark opposition to the scientific approach,
> which Sarma critiques as mechanical and devoid of feelings. For Sarma,
> emotional interaction defines life, and without it, existence becomes
> lifeless and detached.
>
>
>
> ### 2. **Aliens and Earth’s Mechanical Culture**:
>
>    If aliens were to visit Earth, Sarma speculates that they might not be
> impressed by humanity’s reliance on mechanization, science, and technology.
> He argues that the dominant scientific worldview, which prioritizes
> objectivity and detachment, fails to resonate with the basic emotional
> nature of life. From the perspective of these aliens, the Earth might
> appear more like a collection of lifeless processes rather than a planet
> filled with dynamic emotional beings.
>
>
>
> ### 3. **The Role of Geography in Emotion**:
>
>    Sarma introduces an intriguing concept: that emotions are bound to
> geography. Life forms, whether human or alien, are shaped by their
> environment and cannot separate themselves from the climate and geography
> in which they live. For Sarma, this further reinforces the idea that life
> cannot be reduced to mechanical terms, as it is inherently tied to the
> emotional and environmental contexts of existence.
>
>
>
> ### 4. **Critique of Human Detachment from Nature**:
>
>    One of the essay’s central themes is the human detachment from nature,
> driven by the mechanization of life through technology and science. Sarma
> views this as a folly that makes humanity less attractive to any potential
> alien life. The very fact that humans are destroying nature in pursuit of
> economic progress undermines their connection to the Earth and the
> emotional currents that bind all life forms. Sarma raises the possibility
> that aliens may avoid contact with humans precisely because of this
> destructive, mechanical approach to life.
>
>
>
> ### 5. **Alien Communication and the Limits of Science**:
>
>    Sarma questions whether any aliens would even want to communicate with
> humans, given our tendency to suppress emotional engagement in favor of
> mechanical, scientific reasoning. He posits that alien communication, if it
> exists, would likely be emotional and organic, tied to the geography and
> environment of their home planet. In contrast, humanity’s focus on
> scientific achievement, economic exploitation, and environmental
> destruction may render them unappealing to any life forms capable of
> emotional perception.
>
>
>
> In essence, Sarma offers a critique of the modern scientific and economic
> systems, suggesting that these frameworks are antithetical to the emotional
> essence of life. He envisions a universe where true communication—whether
> between humans, other species, or even aliens—is emotional and tied to
> nature, rather than mechanical or technological. The essay calls for a
> return to an emotional connection with the Earth, which Sarma believes
> could lead to a more meaningful existence both for humans and any life
> forms beyond our planet.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZor0HHwyLs95-ot8hUVZN3fP1kg5LqSAzvcmTMjiduCU8A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to