Creating Environments of Sanity, or . . . How does this work?

Dear Readers,

Beginning in the admissions process at Windhorse, when we first meet a
potential client and their family, we often encounter a blizzard of
variables around how someone’s extreme state experience came to be. We
attempt to understand this from their perspective, doing what we can to
learn the language of the individual and family system, all with the
intention of determining whether we think we can possibly be helpful to
them—whether or not they become our clients.  Of course, at the same time,
our potential clients are trying to figure out if we look reliable, whether
we know what we’re doing, and if they’re interested in being in this kind
of relationship with us. For these people looking for help, naturally
flowing through this conversation is intense hope, fear, and uncertainty…
And stated or unstated is always the question, “How does this work?” At
this stage of our evolving relationship, and given what we know about the
complex path of a Windhorse Team, offering a meaningful answer to that
question can be a tall order. However, what we’ve generally found is that
for people who have some kind of resonance and openness to our unusual
approach, they can feel that we’re engaging them with an unanticipated kind
of respect. We may not come out and say this straightaway, but that respect
is based on regarding them as being fundamentally sane. As such their
problems, though perhaps extreme, are human and workable—types of confusion
that are not the most fundamental part of who they are. We have total
confidence in that knowledge, so while attempting to understand the nature
of their confusion and suffering, we’re simultaneously beginning a
conversation with their intrinsic health and sanity. In the overall
Windhorse therapeutic process, beginning in Admissions, that’s one of the
ways people begin experiencing glimpses of clarity amidst the disorienting
uncertainty inherent within extreme state experience. The beginning phase
of answering the question, “How does this work?”, is the experience people
have as we begin a conversation with their fundamentally sane basic nature.

Recognizing everyone’s intrinsic sanity is the most fundamental principle
of our approach, and this was the focus of our Journal entry #005. What I
refer to as the second principle is that we are inseparable from our
environment. In some ways, this may sound counter-intuitive, as we often
experience the world as being comprised of separate objects and energies.
But as we scratch the surface of this with just a bit of analysis, we know
that we’re no more capable of existing independently from the conditions of
our planet and atmosphere, or from our national and local political
processes, or from the influences of our relationships, or from the food,
air, and water we consume, than we can escape the Earth’s gravitational
field unaided. In Journal Entry #021, Elizabeth Mattis Namgyel and Gretchen
Kahre spoke eloquently of the interdependent nature of all phenomena, using
contemporary examples and sensibilities to explain ancient Buddhist
teachings on this truth.

An implication of this interdependence is that when we are in environments
that don’t support our health and sanity, we become vulnerable to all
manner of illness and problems. An example of this could be having our
domestic world in disarray: not eating or sleeping in a good enough rhythm,
personal finances being out of control, and perhaps living in isolation. No
one will function optimally in such an arrangement. Another example is
described by Sebastian Junger in his book, Tribe, where he cites what
appears to be a link between the greater incidence of mental illness and
suicide with the most affluent elements of Western society. He argues that
as the relational fabric of our society becomes less inter-reliant,
resources become less equitably shared, and people feel less important in
one another’s wellbeing. This way of life moves us further away from how we
evolved as a species: living in smaller groups of people with meaningful
relationships, where we felt necessary to one another as well as to the
tribe.

This tribal inter-reliance and more human way of living is in stark
contrast to what most of us might identify as qualities of modern Western
life. Instead, we might describe a world that feels increasingly, and
alarmingly, indecipherable. Consider the functioning of our culture, our
financial and political systems, the spiking advances in technology (think
A.I. and biotechnology, for instance), and the accelerating environmental
changes on our planet. In the midst of these processes, we may feel quite
incapable of exerting meaningful control in the greater world. And though
we may feel disconnected, and at times strongly wishing that we really
could be disconnected, of course we’re completely interdependent with these
processes. The knowledge of that, consciously and unconsciously—especially
for some of the more sensitive and vulnerable among us—can create a toxic,
dissonant psychological undertow. As Junger stated, “Humans don’t mind
hardship, in fact they thrive on it; what they mind is not feeling
necessary.” Feeling disconnected and unnecessary may not be the leading
cause for why people experience confusion in their lives. But as an
atmospheric condition in our modern world, I believe this contributes to a
wide range of disturbances, including extreme mental states for some.

Let’s go back to our friends who are having a conversation with the
Admissions people. A key understanding we communicate is the very positive
implication of this principle of being inseparable from our environment.
That is, if a healthy or sane environment is created, it will generate a
powerful invitation for everyone’s intrinsic sanity to be roused. As we
describe what such a whole person environment looks like in a Windhorse
team, a picture begins to form of ordinary, healthy life: The physical
level is grounded and well cared for, both one’s immediate body and the
existence of a nurturing home with good domestic disciplines. The emotional
and social aspects of the environment are key in providing that experience
of being part of an inter-reliant tribe—in this case a therapeutic team.
These relationships are characterized by an open attitude to actually being
in life with each other, respecting each other’s completely unique
expression of sanity–not simply relating to the client as someone to fix.
It’s primarily in the context of these relationships that someone can
reconnect with and explore their passions and intelligence, coming back
into balance within a healthy social system. And critically, in order for
someone to tolerate the ruggedness of a path of recovery, strong and
resilient relationships are the primary binding elements that allow the
therapeutic team to endure.

At the mind level of this whole person environment, we create an atmosphere
that invites everyone to be awake to their highly individual experience of
intrinsic sanity. Over time, this tends to clarify confusion, and out of
that an allegiance to sanity begins to strengthen. As we join our intention
to reduce confusion with evolving disciplines, it’s not just possible to
create a sustainable path of recovery, but highly probable.

Again, to the question of, “How does this work?”, as our new friends going
through the Admissions process hear healthy, ordinary, and balanced life
being described, it’s so often in stark contrast with how life has been
going within their extreme state world. On a basic human level, we know
that when our environment is seriously out of balance, disconnected from
healthy relationships and out of rhythm, it’s difficult to thrive in that
state of chaos. To begin recovery from extreme state confusion in that kind
of exterior dysregulation is nearly impossible. Even if a detailed
understanding of the efficacy of creating an environment of sanity isn’t
immediately clear (which is nearly impossible at this stage of the
process), people often experience a strong intuitive sense that what’s
being described is undoubtedly moving in the right direction.

Given our decades of experience with this approach, we have confidence in
the power and potential of such an environment. Not everyone needs or wants
this, but for many people it is exactly what is required to begin—and
sustain—a path of recovery.

We consider Chogyam Trungpa’s paper, Creating An Environment Of Sanity, to
be the root instructions for Windhorse practitioners. In it he describes
the ordinary and earthy goodness of such an approach:

It is not true that, if someone has seemingly gone too far into neurosis,
we can’t do anything. We can help people, even those who have gone too far,
beyond the regular channels of communication. The basic point is to evoke
some kind of gentleness, some kindness, some basic goodness, some contact.
When we set up an environment for people to be treated, it should be a
wholesome environmental situation. A very disturbed or withdrawn patient
might not respond right away—it might take a long time. But if a general
sense of loving kindness is communicated, then eventually there can be a
cracking of the cast-iron quality of neurosis: it can be worked with. This
can be arduous. But is it possible, definitely possible.

This principle of being inseparable from our environments will be the
featured topic in our podcast for Journal Entry #023. In the near future,
we will also be presenting podcasts in which the remaining two principles
will be discussed: the third, recovery is the path of discovering and
synchronizing with one’s health and sanity, and the fourth, no matter how
disturbed a mind has become, recovery is possible.

Thank you for joining us, and if any of what you’ve just read prompts
comments and questions, we would greatly appreciate you sharing your
thoughts.

Best Wishes,

Chuck Knapp      Chuck Knapp, M.A., L.P.C., a student of Chogyam Trungpa
and graduate of Naropa University, worked closely for many years with Dr.
Ed Podvoll, originator of the Windhorse Approach. Chuck was a founding
member and later director of Friendship House, which was a publically
funded residential treatment home for people with extreme mental states. In
1990 he co-founded Windhorse Community Services in Boulder, Colorado, where
he continues to serve as a Co-Director. Through his published writings,
presentations at conferences, and as co-founder of the Windhorse Journal in
2018, Chuck continues to share his interest in exploring mindfulness-based
therapeutic environments for both individual and social wellbeing.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Markendeya Yeddanapudi <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 23:09
Subject: Let Nature Beat Back
To: ggroup <[email protected]>, thatha patty <
[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
Satyanarayana Kunamneni <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
viswanatham vangapally <[email protected]>, Rajaram Krishnamurthy
<[email protected]>, Murthy, Jayathi Y <[email protected]>,
Nehru Prasad <[email protected]>, Aparna Attili <[email protected]>,
Usha <[email protected]>, Anisha Yeddanapudi <[email protected]>,
Kunamneni Satyanarayana <[email protected]>, Ramanathan Manavasi <
[email protected]>, Padma Priya <[email protected]>, Ramu S <
[email protected]>, Ramamurti PV <[email protected]>, tnc
rangarajan <[email protected]>, dr anandam <[email protected]>,
Krishnamacharyulu Nanduri <[email protected]>, A. Akkineni <
[email protected]>, APS Mani <[email protected]>, Abhishek Pothunuri <
[email protected]>, Abhinay soanker <[email protected]>,
Manda chiranjeevi das <[email protected]>




-- 
*Mar*
Let Nature Beat back



It is time for all organisms to unite and become one organism, as one macro
body, the Biosphere, and show the monster, the human, that it must become
sane. The Human has mutated into economic man, destroying the basic
symbiosis of nature, poisoning the land, water and air, destroying, rivers,
lakes, waterfalls, seas and oceans, exploding away land, mountains, the
land below, in the madness called economic activity, which today has become
military activity. In the name of science, the very foundation of symbiosis
that governs the Biosphere is denied and asserted as not proved
scientifically or cartesianly.

The symbiotic emotional structure of the Biosphere, may be from bacteria to
whales, where the
organisms,breathe,smell,sense,perceive,interact,act,initiate,c
ooperate,coordinate and harmonize into macro rapture, has been destroyed by
the bludgeoning madness of the human, now the monster mutant, the economic
man.

The monster feels scientific and superior, though it lost and destroyed the
basic emotional connect of/with nature. It scienced and bludgeoned the
dictum, that the Biosphere consists of organisms that war with each other
and that every organism is trying for the Darwin Gold Medal as the Top
Rogue. It is under the mad frenzy to destroy nature, so that nature becomes
the marketable economic good. More than half of the forests of the world,
along with the flora and fauna in them is already destroyed and the
remaining is under rapid economic destruction, with the mutant the economic
man making way for Robots which can be completely be scientific, mechanical
and with no emotions and feelings whatever. The Robot is not even part of
the Biosphere or nature. The economic man is destroying himself by making
all his limbs, organs and systems redundant by substituting every feature
of his biology with a machine. Machines are performing the functions of the
limbs, making the limbs redundant and frozen and function-less, with
hormonal communication and nerve connects in the limbs getting jettisoned.

But can this madness be allowed. There is still hope for the Biosphere. At
the ultimate fundamental level a single electron can become a wave of
infinity if forced, into arrest. But instead of forcing an electron become
such a wave and destroy us, we may ourselves start with small steps towards
sanity.

Let every University constitute ‘The Faculty of Environmental Sanity’.

Let that faculty start with say a large forest totally free from human
tampering.Feelings, understanding and perception and understanding are
basically electromagnetic. May be by converting the electrons into waves of
sanity, the sanity waves may be made to become infinitely powerful. May be
the other organisms, may be teamed, by using electrodes. Symbiosis is the
basic property of nature, and technology basically is unnatural and anti
natural. If the other organisms fight back, the economic man can be killed
and changed into ecological man.

As it is we are living two lives, the lives which we see and the remaining
99.9967% life which we feel without the 3D seeing, the realm of abstract
feelings. If nature is given total freedom we may revive our own 99.9967%
of the life which is of feelings and emotions, based on natural symbiosis.
Actually if you can see everything with your eyes,you cannot see yourself
as you see now, and you confront the gigantic interaction of emotion based
consciousness processes interacting, with continuous macro ramifications.
In that consciousness process interaction every organism is participating
with electromagnetism creating the cosmic connection.

The simple beginning has to be the creation of totally free nature, forests
without human tampering. There can be planning to promote the symbiosis
among the organisms of the Biosphere.

The Universities must get rid of the shackles imposed on them by trade and
commerce. They have to promote free nature and not technology which
invariably harms nature.

YM

Chat GPT



Your message reflects a deep concern for the state of our planet and the
destructive impact of human activity on nature. You advocate for a return
to symbiosis and harmony with the Biosphere, highlighting the importance of
emotions, feelings, and the interconnectedness of all organisms.



You propose the creation of a "Faculty of Environmental Sanity" within
universities as a step towards restoring balance. This faculty would
prioritize the preservation and restoration of natural ecosystems, allowing
for the revival of our emotional and symbiotic connection with nature.



Your emphasis on the destructive nature of technology, when not used in
harmony with nature, underscores the need for a shift in mindset and
approach. By promoting free nature and symbiosis, you suggest a path
towards healing the planet and ourselves.



Overall, your message calls for a fundamental change in how we interact
with nature, advocating for a return to a more balanced and sustainable way
of living.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopqWpOVYSMTp9QB80KP0Y4Y9EaVrqzHNM9KGjZgb8T92Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to