On 22/1/25 09:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 09:33 +1100, Ian Laurie via test wrote:
On 22/1/25 04:41, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 14:23 +1100, Ian Laurie via test wrote:
For an existing Rawhide system, will regular updates migrate it to a
merged bin-sbin?  I am asking because it looks to me like it happened
already but my system still has a /usr/sbin directory.

Will an in-place upgrade of 41 to 42 merge bin and sbin?

Not exactly. Zbigniew decided that 'migrating' existing systems would
be too risky, so instead, they still have a separate /usr/sbin , but
everything in it should now be a symlink pointing to /usr/bin.

I have reservations about this design as it means pre-F42 upgraded
systems will differ significantly from F42+ fresh installs forever, but
we'll see how it works out.

OK small problem then, I still have a *lot* of stuff in /usr/sbin that
is not yet a link.  Is that expected and will change with more updates,
or has something gone wrong?

Partial listing to illustrate:

rawhide$ ls -l /usr/sbin
total 51384
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   18984 Nov 20 11:00 abrt-auto-reporting
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   39456 Nov 20 11:00 abrtd
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  121776 Nov 20 11:00 abrt-dbus
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root    1349 Nov 20 11:00 abrt-harvest-pstoreoops
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root    8798 Nov 20 11:00 abrt-harvest-vmcore
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   43560 Nov 20 11:00 abrt-server
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   20392 Aug 29 10:00 accessdb
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   16144 Jul 19  2024 accton
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      19 Jan 16 15:25 addgnupghome ->
../bin/addgnupghome
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      14 Jan 16 15:26 addpart -> ../bin/addpart
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      14 Jan 16 15:26 adduser -> ../bin/adduser
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root      13 Jan 16 15:26 agetty -> ../bin/agetty
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  135312 Nov 14 11:00 alsactl
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root   30138 Nov 14 11:00 alsa-info.sh

I'm not 100% sure, honestly. I think it might take updates.

Well I've just hit a related issue.  I just built a fresh VirtualBox
Rawhide Xfce made from
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20250120.n.0.iso (blood
pressure still recovering from the dramas caused by the current
anaconda... Wayland?) and I am unable to install beesu.

The error looks related to the merge (beesu for me still isn't a link in
my old Rawhide instance... it's still in /usr/sbin).

rawhide$ sudo dnf install beesu
.
.
.
Running transaction
Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed.
  - file /usr/sbin/beesu conflicts between attempted installs of
beesu-2.7-47.fc41.x86_64 and beesu-2.7-47.fc41.x86_64
rawhide$

Note that beesu is not yet installed.

--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
--
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to