On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Ben Cotton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common > application content - that includes regular application windows, video > output, games and possibly other common content. Regular operations like > windows close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when > supported/applicable), windows switching, using windows on virtual > workspaces, and similar common operations must behave as expected. > > Thinking like an editor for a moment, this feels a little redundant in > places. I agree with the general concept, so this is entirely a > presentation issue and I will not push back if you disagree. :But how > about something more like: > > The desktop environment must perform regular operations like windows > close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when supported/applicable), > windows switching, using windows on virtual workspaces, and similar > common operations as expected. Common application content such as > regular application windows, video output, and games must be displayed > correctly. > Thanks, sounds better. I'll propose an updated version with a few more tweaks mentioned yesterday in the QA meeting. > > > Footnote - "What does this cover?": > > A small number of misbehaving applications is not a violation of this > criterion. The goal of this criterion is to ensure general functionality > for different types of applications and their operations. An example of a > violation would be e.g. if a significant number of QT applications couldn't > be resized (but they should be), or if all Java applications failed to > display any content. > > I'd also add something that makes it clear if it's the application not > displaying the content correctly, that's out of scope for this > criterion. I can't think of a good way to phrase that. But I wouldn't > want someone to think Joe's Fancy Pew Pew Pew Game having a glitchy > display would violate this. > Good idea, I'll try to include it.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
