On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:54 AM Kamil Paral <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:14 AM Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:20 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> But that's microdnf, not the current default dnf. I don't think microdnf >>> was used by default in any of our blocking spins/images. >> >> >> We ship microdnf in the arm minimal image due to issues with dnf and memory >> usage[1] and it's used quite widely on devices like the Raspberry Pi Zero2W. >> The Minimal image is blocking. > > > So if I understand it correctly, microdnf will get a major upgrade, now based > on the dnf5 library. Dnf5 doesn't support modularity in its CLI yet, and > neither will microdnf. But that shouldn't really matter, because the older > microdnf also haven't supported modules, right? So there should be no loss of > functionality... ? Even on the arm minimal image, which is blocking.
The lack of modularity support is not an issue as far as I'm concerned. _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
