On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 16:34 +0000, Will Thompson wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to propose a few people for commit access as per the WIP > procedure at <http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/Committers> (which > is based on WebKit's). That page says that Telepathy reviewers are > defined to be the set of people on the telepathy-reviewers mailing list, > which is currently rather anaemic: > <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/roster/telepathy-reviewers>. > > Are we okay with having a Grand Unified List of Reviewers for all > Telepathy components hosted on freedesktop.org, just as commit access is > all-or-nothing? Obviously people on the list should exercise their own > judgement as to whether they're able to give patches in particular areas > of different projects the thumbs-up. > > Thoughts?
I don't think it's a good idea to have random people review stuff for random modules. Since our modules are relatively small, I think there should be a owner/maintainer for each module so we have a minimum of accountability. Also, the maintainer should always have an overview of the changes to his module, so that he can maintain a good level of consistency Also, some modules (like tp-farsight/farstream) require specialized knowledge so in practice only one or two people could review them anyway. -- Olivier Crête [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy
