On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 10:01 +0200, Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 00:12 -0500, Reşat SABIQ a écrit : > > Hi again, > > > > I haven't seen anything regarding this in FAQ. But i've come across > > reports that > > A. high resolution webcams would lead to high-resolution video streams, > > and that webcam's (max) resolution can't be customized/reduced. > > > > Is statement A. true? If so, i guess it means that it's best to buy a > > webcam that would be expected to perform well at expected bandwidth. > > > > P.S. Is resolution tweaking support being planned in short, medium or > > long term, and are there any operational dates in this regard? > > Yes, there is a bug opened about that > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607478 > > I also think that there are some plans to automatically adjust the > framerate depending on the available bandwidth. The Farsight guys should > be able to tell you more about that.
Currently empathy forces the resolution to be 320x240, but I do plan to do dynamic bitrate/framerate/resolution scaling in the not so distant future. -- Olivier Crête [email protected] Collabora Ltd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy
