On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 13:59 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:09:57AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:03:04AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > gcc4 does not really support C99 initalizers. It works most of
> > > the time
> > > but fails for more complex structs. Just fall back to memset()
> > > here.
> >
> > deraadt used { {0} } in kr_send_dependon(). Apparently that works.
> > I really don't understand why we can't use a 24 years old standard.
>
> It is very annoying. Would be nice if our gcc would allow it since
> c99
> initalizers are a good thing. Not sure I like the { { 0 } } fix.
> Another
Also note that = {0} is available since C89, it's only C99 that
introduced designators (e.g. { .foo = 0 }) so there is no reason why
GCC/clang should not accept that unless there is a bug.
https://godbolt.org/z/6eMWdEEaP
--
David
