That is not your responsibility. It is mine. You can stop asking.
>I am trying to understand how the code review process is conducted in >OpenBSD. I can see all the OK's in the commit log, but not every commit >has the OK. > >On FreeBSD there where a serious problem with a developer who was hired >to by Netgear to create a WireGuard VPN implementation as a kernel-mode >solution and this was then contributed to FreeBSD. It was removed in >the last minute. > >https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-license-violations-and-bad-code-freebsd-13s-close-call/ > >Is it a condition for code to go into the OpenBSD source tree (not >talking about ports) that at least one other developer has reviewed the >code? > >Is there a process in place to guarantee this? > >If it's not a condition and anyone with commit access can commit >freely, how do you prevent something like a committer going "rogue" and >inserts a backdoor or creates another serious problem? > >Cheers. > >
