On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Klemens Nanni [k...@openbsd.org] wrote: > > veb(4) works just fine in this setup, so don't give the impression only > > bridge(4) would work. > > In related items, is it time to tedu bridge(4) and vether(4) ? Is there > anything veb(4) and vport(4) can't do?
There's the link2 ipsec stuff that bridge(4) supports but veb(4) doesn't, IDK if anyone uses it. There's some commented out code in if_veb.c for this, but I don't know whether it is commented out because it doesn't work or because nobody has asked for it At the very least, the ioctls documentation in bridge.4 would need to be copied over to veb.4 - it looks like most of them are supported. -d
