On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:42:29AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Martin Vahlensieck <open...@academicsolutions.ch> wrote:
>
> > if (!qflag) {
> > - fprintf(stderr, "Identity removed: %s %s (%s)\n", path,
> > - sshkey_type(key), comment);
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Identity removed: %s %s%s%s%s\n", path,
> > + sshkey_type(key), comment ? " (" : "",
> > + comment ? comment : "", comment ? ")" : "");
>
> this is probably better as something like
>
> > - fprintf(stderr, "Identity removed: %s %s (%s)\n", path,
> > - sshkey_type(key), comment ? comment : "no comment");
>
> Which has a minor ambiguity, but probably harms noone.
>
Index: ssh-add.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh-add.c,v
retrieving revision 1.165
diff -u -p -r1.165 ssh-add.c
--- ssh-add.c 4 Feb 2022 02:49:17 -0000 1.165
+++ ssh-add.c 9 May 2022 18:36:54 -0000
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ delete_one(int agent_fd, const struct ss
}
if (!qflag) {
fprintf(stderr, "Identity removed: %s %s (%s)\n", path,
- sshkey_type(key), comment);
+ sshkey_type(key), comment ? comment : "no comment");
}
return 0;
}
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ add_file(int agent_fd, const char *filen
certpath, filename);
sshkey_free(cert);
goto out;
- }
+ }
/* Graft with private bits */
if ((r = sshkey_to_certified(private)) != 0) {
