Solene Rapenne [sol...@perso.pw] wrote: > On jeudi 4 novembre 2021 15:09:39 CET, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > btw this was rejected before, > > > > https://github.com/reyk/httpd/issues/21 > > It's not clear if "static" compression is rejected. Sure, on-the-fly > compilation is complicated and bring issues, static compression > is easy to implement and predictible IMO.
In my opinion, this feature makes sense if it can be activated by the 'location' ... It requires explicit preparation by the site operator so it should only activated on demand, per-directory It makes sense to me in this context If someone explicitly requests the .gz version, they get it, regardless of this setting If someone requests the non-gz version, their browser should only get the gz if it agrees to transparently handle the compression And the gz swap only gets activated if the site operator tells httpd this is the desired behavior for a particular directory tree through the location keyword... Chris
