On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 04:45:09PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 22.10.2021. 16:09, Florian Obser wrote: > > > > > > On 22 October 2021 13:55:20 CEST, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> > > wrote: > >> On 2021/10/22 11:25, Jan Klemkow wrote: > >>> this diff add hardware checksum offloading for the receive path of > >>> ixl(4) interfaces. > >> > >> Would be good to have this tested with NFS if anyone has a way to do so. > >> nics are probably better now but I'm pretty sure we have had problems > >> with NFS and offloading in the past. > > > > ospf as well. > > > > ospf seems to work > > > smc24# ospfctl show nei > ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime > 10.1.1.1 1 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:30 192.168.15.123 ixl0 00:01:20 > > > > 10.11.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.12.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.13.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.14.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.15.0.0/16 192.168.15.11 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.16.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.17.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 10.18.0.0/16 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > > 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.12.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.13.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.14.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.16.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.17.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 > 192.168.18.0/24 192.168.15.1 Type 1 ext Network 110 > 00:00:13 >
For ospfd tests you want to make sure that some of the ospf packets need fragmenting. So this needs a sizeable network to hit this. -- :wq Claudio
